Categories: Assignment Help

Write a thoughtful and well-written 1-2 page (about 250-500 words) analysis responding to the topic

I’m trying to learn for my History class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Write a thoughtful and well-written 1-2 page (about 250-500 words) analysis responding to the topic
For $10/Page 0nly
Order Essay

Click here or on the image to access the interactive map of the world in 1453. (Links to an external site.)

Assignment: Write a thoughtful and well-written 1-2 page (about 250-500 words) analysis responding to the topic (below) and please try to submit the assignment by the end of Week 1 (Sunday, August 30th) if possible (you can still submit it after that).

NOTE: This is an opening assignment that will hopefully get you thinking about history and how you will approach history in this class and it will also act as writing practice–while you are not being “graded” on this assignment you will be getting feedback and this will be the start of working on your historical critical thinking and writing skills so please put your best effort into the writing assignment and let me know if you have any particular questions or concerns.

_______________________

Expectations: 1-2 page (about 250-500 words) of clear and strong quality writing, definitely proofread!, responding thoughtfully to the topic.

_______________________

Topic: How would you describe and analyze “Premodern” history in “Afroeurasia” as we studied it this week (the period between 1300-1500 specifically)?

*SPECIAL NOTE: This week’s assignment is deliberately very general and open-ended because I want you to start practicing your writing for the class without too much pressure–there’s absolutely no right or wrong answer here! (If you are unsure how/where to start on this please email me!)

_______________________

Tips: You can (but don’t have to!) consider any of the following:

  • Was this period more or less stable than your perception of world history today? Why?
  • What are the major similarities you see between the “premodern” world we studied this week and the world today?
  • What are the major differences you see between the “premodern” world we studied this week and the world today?
  • How do you think the “premodern” world could/should have been different? Why wasn’t it?
  • What lessons, in particular, do you think we can learn from studying this premodern history to apply to our lives today? Explain.

*NOTE: Again, there are no right or wrong arguments; I just want you to practice making connections to produce a historical argument.

_______________________

Feedback: Your feedback, which will become part of your overall evaluation in this course, will be based on 5 criteria of emphasis–

1. POINT: This will be your specific response to the question (“Premodern history in “Afroeurasia” is best described as ______”). Usually 1 sentence; this is the thesis or topical sentence.

2. EVIDENCE: This is where you cite specific EVIDENCE to support your POINT. Remember, EVIDENCE is 1) factual (something that can be demonstrated to be accurate or related to your point), 2) contemporary (from the time period you are discussing or related to your point), and 3) relevant (relates to your topic and argument).

3. EVALUATION: Having explained your EVIDENCE you then need to tie your argument together by explaining how and why the EVIDENCE supports your POINT. This evaluation, or analysis, connects your argument together to form a strong circle: POINT-EVIDENCE-EVALUATION-POINT.

ARGUMENT: How well you are combining your point, evidence, and evaluation together to form an overall ARGUMENT. The clearer and more specific your connections between your POINT, EVIDENCE, and EVALUATION are the stronger your overall ARGUMENT will be to your audience.

WRITING: The quality of your WRITING doesn’t have to be perfect, but any argument is stronger when it is well-written so be sure to proofread for spelling, grammar, and word-choice.

POINTS: CANVAS LOVES USING POINTS EVEN IF I DON’T WANT TO. PLEASE NOTE:

  • THE RUBRIC “POINTS” ARE NOT COUNTED AND THE RUBRIC TOTAL WILL NOT FACTOR INTO YOUR FINAL GRADE! IT’S JUST A WAY TO GET A SENSE OF AREAS OF STRENGTH AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT.
  • THE ASSIGNMENT POINT (1 POINT) IS BASED ON WHETHER YOU HAVE SUBMITTED THE ASSIGNMENT AND I PROVIDED YOU FEEDBACK–IT IS OTHERWISE MEANINGLESS!

Rubric

Week 1 Writing Assignment Rubric

Week 1 Writing Assignment Rubric

Criteria Ratings

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePointIs the thesis statement/point clear, specific, strong, and is it related to the proposed topic?

Proficient

Describes a position and perspective related to the topic accurately and clearly.

Developing

Identifies an over-simplified position or perspective with minor inaccuracies or a lack of clarity.

Needs Improvement

Incomplete or missing a position or perspective or presents a position or perspective in very unclear or inaccurate terms.

Missing

Missing.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidenceIs the cited evidence clear, specific, accurate, and related to the point/topic? And, if necessary, is the evidence cited correctly?

Proficient

Presents/cites information (data, ideas, or concepts) accurately and appropriately in a context that relates to the point/topic.

Developing

Reports/cites information (data, ideas, or concepts) with minor inaccuracies, irrelevancies, or omissions.

Needs Improvement

Missing necessary evidence or using/citing information (data, ideas, or concepts) inaccurately, incompletely, or omitting relevant information as evidence.

Missing

Missing.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluationIs there a historical interpretation communicated that employs connections, perspectives, ideas, and/or themes to provide effective analysis and evaluation of historical information?

Proficient

Provides an interpretation of information, ideas, or themes that is detailed and well-explained in a logical and clear manner.

Developing

Provides an interpretation of information, ideas, or themes that is generally logical and clear but needs more explanation and specific detail to provide a stronger interpretation.

Needs Improvement

Provides an unclear interpretation of information, ideas, or themes that contains inaccuracies, excessive generalities, and/or a lack of explanation.

Missing

Missing.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgumentIs the overall assignment synthesizing, or connecting, ideas/arguments, evidence, and analytical/evaluative information into a coherent whole–effectively connecting POINT, EVIDENCE, and EVALUATION together?

Proficient

Integrates ideas and/or develops explanations that are clear, coherent, cohesive, and sophisticated–creating a unique and strong argument.

Developing

Arranges ideas and/or develops explanations that are generally clear and coherent save, perhaps, an inconsistency or two caused by a lack of detail, connection, or explanation.

Needs Improvement

Forms ideas and/or develops explanations in a fragmentary manner without clear or coherent order or connection which creates an unclear overall argument.

Missing

Missing.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingDoes the writing use correct spelling, proper grammar and formatting, and clearly and effectively communicate the writer’s argument to their audience?

Proficient

Writing is of clear and consistent quality (correct spelling and grammar); the writing effectively and clearly communicates the position or perspective of the work.

Developing

The writing can be unclear at points as the writing quality (spelling and grammar) varies. At points the writing is not effectively and clearly communicating the position or perspective of the work.

Needs Improvement

The writing quality (spelling and grammar, for example) is inconsistent and is frequently unclear and/or ineffective in communicating the position or perspective of the work.

Missing

Missing.

admin

Share
Published by
admin

Recent Posts

Economic Debate #3- Progressive Income Tax – The Homework Helper

Economic Debate- Progressive Income Tax For this Economic Debate, we are going to discuss the…

2 years ago

MKT 6120 – Marketing Management – Davis Learning Engagement #7

TOPIC: Going Global Discussion Thread 1 (initial post due Wednesday for full credit) Please note:…

3 years ago

jvjvjhvjhvhjvj

Assignment Topic This week will culminate in the creation of a narrated PowerPoint to create…

3 years ago

Students are supposed to select a technological organization of their choice.

The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted…

3 years ago

Increases the risk of wildfires

you need to post your 2-page information flier to share with your Final Project Group.…

3 years ago

Statistics for Technology management

discussion: Discuss the methods used at your company to measure and ensure quality products and…

3 years ago