University of Michigan how Cities Make Us Richer Paper The assignment for the book report is to write around word count at least 1000 words on the followin

University of Michigan how Cities Make Us Richer Paper The assignment for the book report is to write around word count at least 1000 words on the following:

The subtitle of Edward Glaeser’s Triumph of the City is How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. Reading link: https://b-ok.cc/book/1131897/c56506

Among that list of five comparative adjectives (richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier), for which do you personally feel that Glaeser made the most compelling arguments? In short, what in the book grabbed you as especially fascinating or convincing regarding the potential for cities to make the world a better place? Summarize his arguments about why and how cities promote your chosen adjective from the list, including specific details from the book. Mention and discuss a few specific policies Glaeser recommends (or would recommend) that cities—perhaps particular cities—adopt to further promote your chosen adjective.

Your work must be your own. The uploaded reports will be run through VeriCite, a plagiarism-detection service. Incidents of plagiarism will be dealt with harshly.

Triumph of the City Report Rubric

Triumph of the City Report Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary

4.0 pts

the report does a thorough and comprehensive job of summarizing Glaeser’s arguments about how cities promote the chosen adjective

3.0 pts

the report gives a good but incomplete summary of Glaeser’s arguments about how cities promote the chosen adjective

2.0 pts

the report’s summary touches on some of Glaeser’s arguments about how cities promote the chosen adjective but leaves out important aspects

1.0 pts

the report’s summary demonstrates a misunderstanding of one or more of Glaeser’s arguments

0.0 pts

the report lacks the requested summary of Glaeser’s arguments

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion

4.0 pts

the report gives a thorough and comprehensive discussion of Glaeser’s recommended policies for further promoting the chosen adjective

3.0 pts

the report gives a good but incomplete discussion of Glaeser’s recommended policies for further promoting the chosen adjective

2.0 pts

the report’s discussion touches on some of Glaeser’s policy recommendations for the chosen adjective but leaves out other important policies

1.0 pts

the report’s discussion demonstrates a misunderstanding of one or more of Glaeser’s policy recommendations

0.0 pts

the report lacks the requested discussion of policies

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails

4.0 pts

the report’s summary and discussion include a high number of relevant details from the book

3.0 pts

the report’s summary and discussion each include a few relevant details from the book

2.0 pts

the report’s summary and discussion cite details from the book that aren’t relevant

1.0 pts

details from the book are completely absent

0.0 pts

the report attempts to invent fake details from the book

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

4.0 pts

the report has the appropriate length (somewhere between 900 and 1100 words)

3.0 pts

the report goes a little over or under the specified range (around 700 words or around 1300 words)

2.0 pts

the report is significantly shorter or longer than assigned (around 500 words or 1500 words)

1.0 pts

the report is much too short or much too long (around 300 or 1700 words)

0.0 pts

barely anything is written or a novel is submitted

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

4.0 pts

the writing is almost completely free of errors of grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, formatting, and so forth

3.0 pts

there are several or more errors but the essay is still easy to read and understand

2.0 pts

there are many errors of grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, formatting, and so forth

1.0 pts

there are so many errors that they become a serious distraction from the arguments being made

0.0 pts

the writing is so full of errors that it is difficult to read or understand

4.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0