| Module Code: MGT6155 | Coursework Code: MGT6155-1 | |||||||
| Module Title: Supply Networks Management | ||||||||
| Date Available: 02/03/2020 | ||||||||
| Submission details: Friday27th March 2020, 12pm (noon) Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on Supply Networks Management For $10/Page 0nly Electronic submission only through Blackboard (MOLE) Students are now allowed to submit oneTurnitin Check per assignment, which will close 24 hours before the assignment deadline. This allows students to generate an originality report and use this to improve their referencing and citation skills. Turnitin Check is NOT the final submission – students still need to submit their work to the Assignment Link, otherwise it will be marked as Not Submitted. Students should note that the time of submission is taken from once the document has been successfully uploaded and confirmed – this may take more than five minutes during busy periods. Late penalties will be applied to any work submitted from 12.01pm on Friday27th March 2020 onwards. Details of how to calculate a late penalty can be found in the PG Handbook. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure the document/file has uploaded successfully.
When submitting students must:
| ||||||||
| Contribution to Final Mark for Module: 50% | ||||||||
| Maximum Word Length: 1500 words. The word count is for the main body of the text and excludes the reference list, appendices, screenshot captions, tables, charts, index/table of content. If you exceed the word length you will be penalised. For details see the Management School Handbooks.https://sites.google.com/a/sheffield.ac.uk/sumshandbook/learningandteaching/coursework/word-limit-policies | ||||||||
| Requirements: You are required to compile a detailed report following the above-mentioned indications, where the optimal solution is described for the Supply Network Management problem below. Relevant data are on a separate sheet, and each student will be assigned an individual datasheet. These are available on the MGT6155 MOLE site.
Consider a multiple-echelon Supply Network, organised as follows. In the first tier primary products A are produced in plant As, which can be either fed into Plant Bs from the second tier, in order to produceintermediary products B, or sold on the market. Product B can be sold to customers, but is also aproduction input to the final product C, which in turn is produced in the third tier. Product C can be sold to customers while plant Cs can be fed by external sourcesfor B whenever convenient. At each stage, a conversion ratio is provided from input materials to products. As the manufacturing process is not perfectly reliable, onlycertain percentage of the production is good. There are processingcapacities and storage capacities for both raw materials and products. Your objective is find the optimal solution in terms of: Production quantities at each plantfor each period; Shipments on each route for each period; Inventories at each plant for each period; with the aim to minimize the production and logistics costs, whilst meeting the required demand.
Provide a final summary of your findings, suitable for a management report, including your relevant comments and any managerial recommendations.
| ||||||||
| Assessment criteria | Hard Fail (0-39) | Soft Fail (40-49) | Pass (50-59) | Merit (60-69) | Distinction (70-79) | High Distinction (80+) | ||
| Understanding of the case and of the underlying decision making problems | Answers to the proposed questions show a serious lack of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | Answers to the proposed questions show a lack of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | Answers show a sufficient degree of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | Answers show a good degree of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | Answers show a very good degree of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | Answers show an excellent degree of understanding of the case and of the underlying problems | ||
| Accuracy in problem modeling and dataset production | Poor accuracy in modelling the problems is shown. | Insufficient accuracy in modelling the problems is shown. | Just a sufficient amount of accuracy in modelling the problems is shown. | A good accuracy in modelling the problems is shown | A very good accuracy in modelling the problems is shown | An excellent accuracy in modelling the problems is shown | ||
| Accuracy in obtaining and explaning the results | Poor and not detailed explanations are provided. | Insufficient explanations are provided. | Provided explanations are endowed with sufficient clarity. | Clear explanations are provided | Very clear explanations are provided | Excellent explanations are provided | ||
| Accuracy in performing sensitivity and what-if analyses | No analyses are provided. | Insufficient analyses are provided. | Sufficient analyses are provided. | Good analyses are provided. | Very good analyses are provided. | Excellent analyses are provided. | ||
| Originality and accuracy in defining the managerial implications of the case studies. | No link to management implications is provided. | Poor link to management implications is provided. | Some links to management implications are provided. | Clear links to management implications are provided. | Very clear links to management implications are provided. | Excellent links to management implications are provided. | ||
| Accuracy in writing the Report | Very weak and not well organised presentation | Weak presentation with significant structure problems | Clear presentation with some structure problems | Good presentation with clear structure | Very good presentation with very clear structure | Excellent presentation with excellent structure | ||
| Referencing: you must reference your work correctly using the Harvard method. Failure to do so will result in the deduction of marks and possible proceedings under the University’s Regulations as to the Use of Unfair Means
| ||||||||
| Independence of working: You are reminded of the University’s Regulations on the Use of Unfair Means and academic integrity which are outlined in the School’s Handbooks. If there is a suspicion that your work is not your own and that you have used unfair means or there is suspicion of a breach of academic integrity in writing this assessment then you may be referred to our unfair means officers to consider your work. Therefore, you are advised to ensure that you undertake the relevant guidance on the module site or programme level sites that you have access too. If you cannot access these, please contact the Student Experience Office. | ||||||||
| Other Submission Details: You are required to compile a detailed report following the above-mentioned indications. All optimisation analyses should be undertaken using IBM ILOG CPLEX. You can include screenshots from the software package, tables and charts to the report. In writing the report, please use a 12pt font and a line spacing not greater than 1.3. | ||||||||
| Other matters: None | ||||||||
Economic Debate- Progressive Income Tax For this Economic Debate, we are going to discuss the…
TOPIC: Going Global Discussion Thread 1 (initial post due Wednesday for full credit) Please note:…
Assignment Topic This week will culminate in the creation of a narrated PowerPoint to create…
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted…
you need to post your 2-page information flier to share with your Final Project Group.…
discussion: Discuss the methods used at your company to measure and ensure quality products and…