State University of New York Climate Change is Escalating Faster Than Ever Before Article Analysis POST : Climate Change is Escalating Faster Than Ever Be

State University of New York Climate Change is Escalating Faster Than Ever Before Article Analysis POST :

Climate Change is Escalating Faster Than Ever Before.

My argument for my essay will be that climate change is real and has more serious and devastating outcomes than we may think. This argument relates to my major since it covers a large issue in Geoscience which is climate change. Climate change has always been a controversial topic in Geoscience since some think it is a natural cycle that can not be avoided while other think it can be a catastrophic phase caused by humans. No matter which side you believe in, it is definitely worth looking into both sides since we only have one Earth and we need to take the measures to protect and save it from catastrophe.

My three key points will be fluctuating temperatures, rising sea levels, and increase forest fires, each of which are proven to be effects of climate change. Each of these three factors relate to each other and follow a cycle. The biggest factor of these climate changes would be fluctuating temperatures since it can lead to both rising sea levels by melting ice and glaciers and an increase in forest fires since it creates dry and hot weather. These factors are all important since it affects us all. With an increase of forest fires, we experience lower forest regeneration which affects oxygen output as well as endangering and displacing of animals. A rise in sea levels means a large change in environment where the ice was as well as displacement of people who live in, on, or around coastal cities. The more ice that melts, the more land we lose as our humans are forced inland. A lose in coastal cities can be devastating since most of the worlds largest cities are located near the coast.

My potential audience would be environmental activists, climatologists, and climate realists. My main goal would be for climate realists to see this so they can understand my point of the argument and so we can all band together to further mitigate or prevent the negative outcomes of human caused climate change. The main counter argument that I have found was that all this data is just future projecting and not actual evidence that the climate is changing, so disproving that will be my hardest challenge. Even if the counterargument is that the evidence is just future projecting, I believe we need to take all measures to better the environment regardless. We need to take care of the Earth we live on since we only have one and we cannot risk losing it.

I want this essay to be able to persuade those who don’t believe that climate change isn’t real or serious, because this world means more to me than anything and even if outcomes don’t seem serious in our future, I want people to consider their children’s and grandchildren’s future as well. I will need a lot of scientific data and evidence that backs up my claims in order for anyone to believe this as well as good persuasive keywords. I have found plenty of sources that collect climate data and its period of change that can help me support my argument.

My first potential resource is one published by NASA (https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/). I believe this source is very credible and contains analytics looking into the Earth’s climate and temperatures around Earth. This will mainly be my factual data evidence since it has many charts and analytics I can investigate.

Another source would be one posted on a credible environmental website (https://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/why-climate-change-matters/evidence-climate-change) which has an easy to understand article on how climate change affects us and the planet we live on.

A third source is from (https://insideclimatenews.org/news/03102017/infographic-ocean-heat-powerful-climate-change-evidence-global-warming) which details what it assumes to be the most profound evidence of climate change and how they gathered evidence from many different scientists.

Annotations

I plan on going over the three outcomes in different paragraphs so I will most likely include the evidence in the middle of each paragraph so I can give a summary, give evidence, and then restate my claims for every paragraph. A revision strategy I think would be most helpful is going over my essay and seeing if placement of certain topics sounds good where it is or if I can find a better placement for it elsewhere in my essay. I feel like I will have some difficulty with organization.

My first source is an article titled “I Went to a Climate Change Denial Conference. It Made Even Less Sense Than You’d Think.” written by Christine Macdonald. This source is arguing that the people who don’t believe in climate change and global warming are just denying the opposing sides evidence without considering it and instead support their evidence that has been disproved by many scientists. It also talks about how “climate realists” are using outdated information to support their claims and are not thinking about the future. The source uses research from climatologists and uses it to challenge the arguments of what she calls “climate denialists”. The author of this article used research from climatologists and acknowledges the opposing sides arguments while also providing evidence from her side. This source gives me “climate realists” have. The source is located at: https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/apps/doc/IOWNZQ613831302/OVIC?u=nhc_main&sid=OVIC&xid=c78f9579

My second source is an article called “Detecting human influence on the temperature changes in Central Asia” written in collaboration by Dongdong Peng, Tianjun Zhou, Lixia Zhang and Liwei Zou, all of which are geoscientists. This source talks about how extreme climate change is in Asia and how it has been caused by human influence. More specifically it goes into detail about temperature fluctuation in the area and how it was caused by a large amount of greenhouse gases.

The source uses temperature analytics to support its argument. Each of the scientists conducted their own part of research to observe how humans have affected the climate in Asia and then combined what they learned to further their understanding. The authors are recognized scientists who use their own data as well as other scientific data and combines them all into one with each other reviewing their work. It is not just the work of one biased person, but instead a team working together to get information out in the world about climate change. It is all peer reviewed. This source directly supports my argument that climate change is real and having bad effects on Earth and provides evidence proving that climate change is real, and it is serious. The source is located at (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-019-04804-2#author-information)

My third source is an interview done by Kevin Berger, titled “Climate Change Is Not a Catastrophe” located at (https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/apps/doc/EJ3010040207/OVIC?u=nhc_main&sid=OVIC&xid=ef6e040f).

In this interview, Berger asks Bjorn about his views and his book written about climate change. Bjorn argues that climate change does not mean that the world will end and that instead it is just going through a small period of change that we all will eventually adapt to. He acknowledges its existence while also stating that there are more urgent matters at hand that we should deal with rather than focusing all our attention into the climate. The source strongly believes that climate change will not be catastrophic. His confident words and how he even acknowledges that his sources might seem “controversial” or “crazy” seems to make him more believable. Since Bjorn is a scientist, it gives him more credibility. I will use evidence of fluctuating temperatures and use those averages to prove how climate change is real and is escalating faster than we can imagine therefore making it an urgent matter and we shouldn’t just sit around brushing it to the side.

QUESTIONS :

1. In your own words, identify the argument of your peer’s persuasive essay. What are they aiming to prove?

2. Has your peer adequately addressed opposing viewpoints?

3. Which of the summaries (or which sections of the summaries) could use more clarification? How could your peer’s summaries be improved? Please paste an example and, if appropriate, offer your own edits.

4. Has your peer provided adequate credentialing information? If so, how can you tell the source is credible? If not, what could your peer add to note the reliability of the source?

5. Do the sources your peer describes in the annotated bibliography connect to their argument in a clear and easy-to-understand manner? If so, how so? If not, what are some ways in which your peer could strengthen those connections?

6. Does your peer acknowledge a counter-argument in one of the annotations? If a counterargument is presented, do they provide a persuasive rebuttal? If no counterargument is presented, can you anticipate some of the objections your peer should take into consideration?

7. Evaluate the sources your peer has selected. Which sources do you find to be the strongest? Why do you think they are strong, and how do they support your peer’s key points? Are there ways the sources could support those key points that your peer has overlooked? Be specific.