SCS 200 SNHU Mental Health And Social Issues Among Veterans Essay I have chosen social issues with Veterans to do my research and write my paper on. Vetera

SCS 200 SNHU Mental Health And Social Issues Among Veterans Essay I have chosen social issues with Veterans to do my research and write my paper on. Veterans experience mental health disorders, substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress, and traumatic brain injury at disproportionate rates compared to their civilian counterparts. Eighteen to 22 American veterans commit suicide daily and young veterans aged 18–44 are most at risk. “ Medical records of veterans reveal “that one in three patients was diagnosed with at least one Mental health disorder – 41% were diagnosed with either a mental health or a behavioral adjustment disorder”.3 In compensation or in combination with military-related diseases, many veterans develop substance use disorders (SUDs) and a large number ultimately commit suicide.” Some of the issues that I am going to research are Veterans with SUD, TBI, PTSD, Depression, Suicide and Homelessness. SUD is substance use disorder which veterans have an increased risk for substance use issues. PTSD is post-traumatic stress disorder which is common for military veterans to develop as they get older and after having a traumatic brain injury usually coincides with PTSD. Depression is another issue with veterans. Depression ranks among one of the most common mental health disorders. It is known that 18-22 veterans commit suicide daily. Those 18–44 years are most at risk of suicide. Last is homelessness among veterans. Approximately 12 percent of the homeless population are veterans. SCS 200 Project One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Professionals in the social sciences investigate human behavior and society for the purpose of understanding why people act the way they do. This investigation
can help address a wide variety of social issues, such as the role of social media in the Arab Spring protests, the impact of social skills on future success, racial
factors in police violence, and how partitioned grocery carts can help shoppers purchase healthier foods. Social scientists can help address issues such as these
through research and investigation.
The summative assessment for this course has two parts. In Project One, you will conduct a research investigation that examines an issue in the social sciences.
You will identify appropriate resources for investigating the issue you select, use these resources to apply social science principles to the issue, and develop a
question related to the issue. In addition, you will identify an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Project Two, you will develop a
presentation for the audience you identified in Project One. In your presentation, you will explain how social scientific thinking has affected you and discuss the
impact of the issue on your audience, supporting your claims with evidence.
Project One addresses the following course outcomes:




Illustrate the impact of social scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
Select appropriate and relevant social science resources in investigating contemporary issues in the social sciences
Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of human behavior
Apply essential principles of the social sciences in addressing critical questions related to human behavior
Prompt
In Project One, you will select a contemporary issue in the social sciences to investigate. You may select an issue discussed in the course, or you may select your
own with instructor approval. You could consider using your question from SCS 100 if it is something you would like to investigate further for this assessment.
After selecting an issue, you will conduct a research investigation, identifying appropriate resources for researching the issue, applying social science principles to
your issue, and developing a question related to the issue. You will submit your research investigation as a written report.
1
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Introduction: In this section, you will discuss your social science issue and select resources that you can use to research the issue. Specifically, you should
do the following:
A. Describe the issue in the social sciences that you have selected to investigate. Why is this issue significant?
B. Describe at least three social science resources that you could use to investigate the issue you selected. Your sources must be relevant to your
issue and must be of an academic nature appropriate for the issue. In your description, consider questions such as these: What are the
similarities and differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your issue? What was
your thought process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices?
II. Body: In this section, you will use the social science resources that you selected to investigate your issue, focusing on an appropriate audience and the
social science principles related to the issue. Be sure to cite your sources. Based on your research, address the following:
A. Identify the social science principles that apply to your issue. In other words, which principles of social science apply to the issue you selected?
B. Explain how the principles you identified apply to your issue. In other words, how are the social science principles you identified relevant to your
issue?
C. Identify an audience that would be interested in your issue. For example, who would benefit most from hearing your message? Or who could
best help in addressing the issue?
D. Describe how and why you can tailor your message to your audience, providing specific examples. For example, will your audience understand
social scientific terminology and principles, or will you need to explain these? How will you communicate effectively with your audience?
III. Conclusion: In this section, you will conclude your research investigation by discussing future directions for research. Specifically, you should do the
following:
A. Based on your investigation, develop a research question related to the issue you selected. In other words, what would you like to know more
about?
B. Explain how a social scientist would go about investigating the research question you developed. In other words, what would the next steps be if
a social scientist were to continue researching your question?
IV. Provide a reference list that includes all of the social science resources you used to investigate your issue and question. Ensure that your list is formatted
according to current APA guidelines (or another format with instructor permission).
2
Project One Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your research investigation should be 3 to 5 pages in length and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and
one-inch margins. You should use current APA style guidelines (or another format approved by your instructor) for your citations and reference list.
Critical Elements
Introduction: Issue
Exemplary
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
description is exceptionally
clear and contextualized (100%)
Proficient
Describes selected issue in
social sciences and its
significance (85%)
Introduction: Social
Science Resources
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
description of resources
demonstrates strong
understanding of information
needed to investigate issues in
the social sciences (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates insight
into essential social science
principles (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates insight
into essential social science
principles (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
identification of audience
demonstrates insight into issue
(100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates
sophisticated understanding of
how to effectively communicate
with specific audience (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates
understanding of social
scientific thinking (100%)
Describes at least three relevant
and appropriate social science
resources that could be used to
investigate selected issue (85%)
Body: Identify
Principles
Body: Explain
Principles
Body: Audience
Body: Message
Conclusion: Research
Question
Identifies social science
principles that apply to issue,
citing sources (85%)
Explains how identified
principles apply to issue, citing
sources (85%)
Identifies an audience that
would be interested in issue,
citing sources (85%)
Describes how and why
message can be tailored to
audience, providing specific
examples and citing sources
(85%)
Develops research question
related to selected issue, based
on investigation (85%)
3
Needs Improvement
Describes selected issue in
social sciences and its
significance, but with gaps in
detail or clarity (55%)
Describes at least three social
science resources that could be
used to investigate selected
issue, but with gaps in
appropriateness, relevance, or
detail (55%)
Identifies social science
principles that apply to issue,
but with gaps in accuracy or
citation (55%)
Explains how identified
principles apply to issue, but
with gaps in detail, clarity, or
citation (55%)
Identifies an audience, but
audience is not appropriate for
issue or there are gaps in
citation (55%)
Describes how and why
message can be tailored to
audience, but with gaps in
examples or citation (55%)
Not Evident
Does not describe selected
issue in social sciences or its
significance (0%)
Develops research question
related to selected issue, but
question is not based on
investigation (55%)
Value
10.5
Does not describe at least three
social science resources that
could be used to investigate
selected issue (0%)
10.5
Does not identify social science
principles that apply to issue
(0%)
10.5
Does not explain how identified
principles apply to issue (0%)
10.5
Does not identify an audience
(0%)
10.5
Does not describe how and why
message can be tailored to
audience (0%)
10.5
Does not develop research
question related to selected
issue (0%)
10.5
Conclusion: Social
Scientist
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates
understanding of social
scientific thinking (100%)
Reference List
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy to read
format (100%)
Explains how a social scientist
would go about investigating
research question (85%)
Provides reference list that
includes all social science
resources used to investigate
issue and question, ensuring
that list is formatted according
to current APA guidelines
(100%)
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
(85%)
Explains how a social scientist
would go about investigating
research question, but with
gaps in clarity, detail, or logic
(55%)
Provides reference list that
includes all social science
resources used to investigate
issue and question, but list has
gaps in adherence to current
APA formatting guidelines
(55%)
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas (55%)
Does not explain how a social
scientist would go about
investigating research question
(0%)
10.5
Does not provide reference list
that includes all social science
resources used to investigate
issue and question (0%)
10.5
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas (0%)
5.5
Total
4
100%
SCS 200 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Professionals in the social sciences investigate human behavior and society for the purpose of understanding why people act the way they do. This investigation
can help address a wide variety of social issues, such as the role of social media in the Arab Spring protests, the impact of social skills on future success, racial
factors in police violence, and how partitioned grocery carts can help shoppers purchase healthier foods. Social scientists can help address issues such as these
through research and investigation.
For the second project in this course, you will build on the work completed in Project One and develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Project
One. In your presentation, you will explain how social scientific thinking has affected you and discuss the impact of the issue on your audience, supporting your
claims with evidence.
Project Two addresses the following course outcomes:
●
●
●
Illustrate the impact of social scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of human behavior
Utilize evidence-based approaches in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary issues on individuals and society
Prompt
In Project Two, you will use the research investigation you wrote for Project One to create a presentation that explains how social scientific thinking has affected
you and discusses the impact of your selected issue on your audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Provide a brief overview of the social scientific background of your issue and research question. How is the issue situated within the social sciences?
II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about
the response to your question or the outcome of your investigation? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
III. Describe the evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support your
response with specific examples from your research investigation.
IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
1
V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research
and develop a question affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did social scientific thinking change the lens through which you
viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
VI. Explain why using evidence-supported research can give you both a personal and professional advantage. In other words, what is the value of
supporting your work with evidence?
VII. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s
potential current social science knowledge or lack thereof, and what is specifically important to the audience.
Project Two Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5–7 slides and use Prezi, PowerPoint, or a comparable presentation tool. Make sure
that you include speaker notes so that your instructor knows what you would say if you were to actually give the presentation. Note: If using Prezi, be sure to
include a Word document with notes. If using PowerPoint, be sure to include speaker notes.
Critical Elements
Social Scientific
Background
Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response expertly balances
necessary detail with brevity
Proficient (85%)
Provides brief overview of
social scientific background of
issue and research question
and explains how issue is
situated within social sciences
Audience
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation demonstrates
sophisticated understanding of
relationship between issue and
audience
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates strong
understanding of using
evidence in drawing
conclusions about the impact
of contemporary social
scientific issues
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation demonstrates keen
insight into impact of social
Explains how issue impacts
audience, supporting response
with examples from research
investigation
Evidence
Personally
Needs Improvement (55%)
Provides brief overview of
social scientific background of
issue and research question
and explains how issue is
situated within social sciences,
but with gaps in detail or clarity
Explains how issue impacts
audience, but with gaps in
clarity, detail, or support
Not Evident (0%)
Does not provide brief overview
of social scientific background of
issue and research question and
does not explain how issue is
situated within social sciences
Does not explain how issue
impacts audience
13.5
Describes evidence that
supports conclusions about
impact of issue on self and
audience, supporting response
with examples from research
investigation
Describes evidence that
supports conclusions about
impact of issue on self and
audience, but with gaps in
clarity, detail, or support
Does not describe evidence that
supports conclusions about
impact of issue on self and
audience
13.5
Explains why issue is important
personally
Explains why issue is important
personally, but with gaps in
clarity or detail
Does not explain why issue is
important personally
13.5
2
Value
13.5
Investigation
Evidence-Supported
Research
Message
Articulation of
Response
sciences on personal
experiences
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates insight
into relationship between issue
and social scientific thinking
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
response demonstrates keen
insight into impact of social
sciences on personal and
professional experiences
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
presentation demonstrates
understanding of effectively
communicating with specific
audiences by tailoring message
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented
in a professional and easy to
read format
Illustrates how investigation of
issue impacted thinking on the
issue, supporting response with
examples from research
investigation
Explains why using evidencesupported research can give
both a personal and
professional advantage
Communicates message
effectively in a way that is
tailored to specific audience
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Illustrates how investigation of
issue impacted thinking on the
issue, but with gaps in clarity,
detail, or support
Does not illustrate how
investigation of issue impacted
thinking on the issue
13.5
Explains why using evidencesupported research can give
both a personal and
professional advantage, but
with gaps in clarity or detail
Communicates message to
audience, but communication
is not effective or is not
tailored to specific audience
Does not explain why using
evidence-supported research can
give both a personal and
professional advantage
13.5
Does not communicate message
to audience
13.5
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
5.5
Total
3
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment