SCM3515 Temple University Producing Goods And Services MRP Record Project Hi there, Please see below for requirments, thanks. I want detailed answer for t

SCM3515 Temple University Producing Goods And Services MRP Record Project Hi there,

Please see below for requirments, thanks. I want detailed answer for this one. Please see files attached. 

Assignment 7 Ch 6 Producing Goods & Services (Edition 9 Ch 12 Operations)

Develop an MPS, assess requirements and create an MRP record for given data on products and their sub-components.  This assignment bridges operations management to materials management.  Answers should be entered in Canvas. 

A manufacturing company, Tau Upsilon, makes a set of specialty product under the brand name Zeta.  There are three designs in the Zeta line- Alpha, Beta and Gamma. 

1.) Determine the low-level coding and the quantity of each component necessary to produce 10 units of Alpha.  The product structure and quantities of each component needed for each assembly are noted:  Alpha is composed of B(1) and C(1).  B is composed of D(2) and C(2), while C is composed of E(1) and F(1).  Note:  There is 2 Cs in the B and 1 C that goes directly into the Alpha.

2.) Using the following table, composed of lead time, quantity on hand, and master production schedule, prepare a net MRP table for Alpha.  An MRP file is also attached.

Item

Lead Time

Quantity on Hand

Alpha

1

10

B

2

20

C

3

0

D

1

100

E

1

10

F

1

50

MPS For Alpha

FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTFILLER TEXT

Period

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Gross Requirements

50

50

100

FILLER TEXT

FILLER TEXT Assignment 7 Ch 6 Producing Goods & Services (Edition 9 Ch 12 Operations)
Develop an MPS, assess requirements and create an MRP record for given data on products and their sub-components. This assignment bridges operations management to materials management. Answers should be entered in Canvas.
A manufacturing company, Tau Upsilon, makes a set of specialty product under the brand name Zeta. There are three designs in the Zeta line-Alpha, Beta and Gamma.
1.) Determine the low-level coding and the quantity of each component necessary to produce 10 units of Alpha. The product structure and quantities of each component needed for each assembly are noted: Alpha is composed of B(1) and C(1). Bis composed of D(2) and C(2), while C
is composed of E(1) and F(1). Note: There is 2 Cs in the B and 1 C that goes directly into the Alpha.
2.) Using the following table, composed of lead time, quantity on hand, and master production schedule, prepare a net MRP table for Alpha. An MRP file is also attached.
Item
Lead Time
Quantity on Hand
Alpha
1
10
B
2
20
?
3
o
D
1
100
E
1
10
F
1
50
MPS For Alpha
Period
6 7
8
9
10 11
12
13
Gross
Requirements
50
50
100
Assignment Project Rubric Fa2019
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Objective deliverables fulfilled (30%) Students
deliver on all requirements of the assignment.
Work is representative of a rising professional
in the field (i.e. professional and
comprehensive)
30.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent fulfillment of objective deliverables – Delivers on all
requirements of the assignment and is representative of a
rising professional in the field (i.e. professional and
comprehensive).
27.75 pts
Very Good
Very good fulfillment of objective deliverables – Delivers on most
requirements of the assignment and meets most expectations of a
rising professional in the field (i.e. professional and
comprehensive).
25.5 pts
Good
Fair fulfillment of objective deliverables – Delivers on many
requirements of the assignment and meets a moderate number of
expectations of a rising professional in the field (i.e. professional and
comprehensive).
21.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Objective deliverables are not met. Does not
deliver on many requirements of the assignment
and is not demonstrative of a rising professional in
the field.
30.0 pts
15.0 pts
Good
Work demonstrative of concept understanding
(20%) Students offer proof that key course
concepts at focus in the assignment are
understood, appropriately applied and
expanded on.
20.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent demonstration of concept understanding – Understanding
of concepts and application to course assignments is appropriate,
novel in some respects and/or elaborated on as the assignment
allows.
17.0 pts
Very Good
Very Good demonstration of concept understanding – Sound understanding
of concepts and application to course assignments is appropriate. There is
some evidence of novel thought and/or elaboration as the assignment
allows.
12.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Objective deliverables are
not met. Concepts are
incorrectly applied,
confused or missing.
Moderate demonstration of concept understanding – Some evidence of concept
understanding and appropriate application to course assignments. Concept is
applied, but lacks elaboration and novelty with respect to the assignment at
hand.
20.0 pts
15.0 pts
Good
Problem solving approach is sound (20%).
Students calculations, analysis/analytics and
deductions are correct. Procedures and
methods are employed that are proven in the
field and/or backed in theory.
20.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent demonstration of approach and
methodology – Students calculations,
analysis/analytics and deductions are correct.
Procedures and methods are employed that are
proven in the field and/or backed in theory.
17.0 pts
Very Good
Very good demonstration of approach and methodology – Students
calculations, analysis/analytics and deductions are mostly correct.
Procedures and methods are employed that are proven in the field and/or
backed in theory, but may be partially incomplete or inferior to other
methods in the application at hand.
12.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Objective deliverables are not met.
Calculations, analysis/analytics and deductions
are incorrect or missing. Procedures and
methods are lacking and/or are not proven in
the field and/or backed in theory.
Moderate demonstration of approach and methodology – Students attempt
calculations, analysis/analytics and deductions, but attempt may have minor
faults. There is evidence of an attempt to employ procedures and methods and
either the attempt is incomplete or the procedure/method may be inappropriate
for the analysis at hand.
20.0 pts
15.0 pts
Good
Conclusions are Logical and Supported (20%)
Students offer a rationale for conclusions.
Actions taken are logical (flow from the previous
requirement) and build a natural bridge from
fact finding and analysis to recommendations
and action items.
20.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent demonstration of conclusions and
recommendations – Rationale offered for recommendations
and conclusions that logically flow from analysis and
findings. Recommendations and conclusions build a bridge
that will deliver improvements/key outcomes in the domain
of the assignment discipline.
17.0 pts
Very Good
Very good demonstration of conclusions and recommendations – Rationale
offered for recommendations and conclusions that mostly logically flows from
analysis and findings. Recommendations and conclusions move the firm towards
a plan that will deliver some improvements/key outcomes in the domain of the
assignment discipline, but lack a thorough treatment of all variables and
considerations.
Moderate demonstration of conclusions and recommendations – Evidence exists but
there is incomplete rationale offered for recommendations and conclusions suggested
to flows from analysis and findings. Recommendations and conclusions move the firm
towards a plan that may deliver moderate improvements/key outcomes in the domain of
the assignment discipline, but lack a thorough treatment of all variables and
considerations
12.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Objective deliverables
are not met.
Conclusions do not
generally flow from
course findings nor are
they subsequently
supported.
20.0 pts
Writing Style (10%) demonstrated. Groups
apply conventional grammatical rules and style
guidelines. All media is professional. Work flows
and is cohesive.
10.0 pts
Excellent
Language is especially clear and concise and follows conventions
of Standard Written English without error. Always professional
and cohesive.
8.5 pts
Very Good
There are only minor errors in the use of
Standard Written English. Usually
professional and cohesive.
7.5 pts
Good
There are some major errors in the use of Standard Written English
that sometimes impact clarity or effectiveness. Moderately
professional and cohesive,
6.0 pts
Needs Improvement
There are serious errors in the use of Standard Written English
impacting clarity/effectiveness. Not professional. Does not represent
cohesive voice.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Purchase answer to see full
attachment