Saudi Electronic University ?organizational Change Research Organizational Change Each organization has its own background perceptions, ethics, values, h

Saudi Electronic University ?organizational Change Research Organizational Change

Each organization has its own background perceptions, ethics, values, history, and ambitions. Therefore, a “one size fits all” change management process may not work in every organization. We must assess and adapt our process to fit the backgrounds and philosophies of each organization.

Given this understanding, we need to research and assess when, and if, an organization is ready for change, and then adopt a process to best facilitate the change process. In a three-to-five page paper, choose a Middle Eastern organization at which you are currently working or one in which you are familiar. (If neither is possible, conduct an internet search to identify a Middle Eastern organization which has gone through a transformation process within the last three years.) Then address the following:

Provide a brief summary of the organization (its history, culture, industry, product, and services).
Explain why a change was needed. What is the gap between the present state and the desired future state?
How strong is the need for change?
What is the source of this need? Is it external to the organization?
If the change does not occur, what will be the impact on the organization in the next two to six years?
Explain the change process that was created and implemented, identify the outcome of the change in terms of success, failures, cultural outcomes, and human resource changes.
Finally, based on what you have learned thus far in the course, evaluate the company’s readiness for change and then offer constructive advice on strategies the organization may/should have considered to create/implement a more successful change process.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Be three-to-five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. i will attach it SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 5
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
change process,
with no errors or
major omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points
Sources
Sources meet
required criteria
and include three
or more scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal articles
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
Demonstrates
Project is clearly
college-level
organized, well
proficiency in
written, and in
organization,
proper format as
grammar and
outlined in the
style.
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure, contains
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
16-20 Points
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
change process;
may include some
minor errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
10-12 Points
Sources meet
required criteria
and include two
scholarly, peerreviewed journal
articles chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
11-15 Points
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
change process;
and/or includes
some major errors
or omissions.
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
change process;
and/or includes
many major errors
or omissions.
7-12 Points
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
4-6 Points
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
No sources are
included.
4 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
3 Points
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
13-18 Points
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-9 Points
Source meets
required criteria
and includes one
scholarly, peerreviewed journal
article chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
1-2 Points
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 5
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
structure, may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment