Samuel Merritt University Case Study and PICOT Question Development The assignment is to read the case study that I’ll upload below then document the PICOT

Samuel Merritt University Case Study and PICOT Question Development The assignment is to read the case study that I’ll upload below then document the PICOT, scholarly article, and the treatment plan developed on the worksheet Please follow the guidelines and instructions strictly as mentioned on the uploaded files including the criteria for grading Case Study and PICOT Question Worksheet
Case Description
Imagine that you are an NP working in a family practice setting. Your patient is a 26-year-old
female who comes in today complaining of cough, fatigue, and chest pain. Vital signs are all
within normal limits. She has been sick for 3 weeks and anxious to get back to work. She is
requesting antibiotics. As her NP you believe she has viral bronchitis. Your treatment plan
consists of symptomatic management and no antibiotics.
Review Figure 7-1: PICOT definition and questions on p. 184 of Role Development for the Nurse
Practitioner.
Complete the worksheet below according to the following guidelines:
• Use the PICOT method to develop a searchable question.
• Identify one scholarly article to support your recommendation, and include a hyperlink.
• Develop a treatment plan incorporating the evidence to discuss with your patient.
Searchable Question
[Type PICOT-format question here]
Scholarly Article
[Type article reference here]
Article Hyperlink
[Paste hyperlink to the article here]
Level of Evidence
[Identify the level of evidence the article is using here]
Recommendations for Treatment and Follow-up
[Type your recommended treatment plan here]
Calendar
= TO DO
Notifications
Inbox
11
DOO
F4
F5
F6
$
4
%
5
&
7
8
R
T
Y
U
samuelmerritt instructure.com
Samuel Merritt University – MySMU
Samuel Merritt University – MySMU
= N672 Professional Role Dev for Adv Pract Nurs > Assignments > Week 4 – Case Study and PICOT Question Development
2019FALL
Home
Week 4 – Case Study and PICOT Question Develop-
ment
Submit Assignment
Announcements
ard
Syllabus
Due Oct 6 by 11:59pm
Points 10
Modules
Submitting a file upload
es
Assignments
3
ips
Discussions
Resource: Case Study and PICOT Question Worksheet
na
Grades
ndar
People
Conferences
Imagine you are an NP working in a family practice setting. Your patient is a 26-year-old female who comes in today
complaining of cough, fatigue, and chest pain. Vital signs are all within normal limits. She has been sick for 3 weeks and
anxious to get back to work. She is requesting antibiotics. As her NP, you believe she has viral bronchitis. Your treatment
plan consists of symptomatic management and no antibiotics.
OX
Collaborations
3
Read the case study and document the following on the worksheet:
elp
Panopto Library
Student Resources
Faculty Resources
Use the PICOT method to develop a searchable question.
Identify one scholarly article to support your recommendation, and include the hyperlink to the article in your
worksheet.
• Develop a treatment plan incorporating the evidence to discuss with your patient.
Ongoing Feedback
Submit your completed worksheet including a hyperlink to your article to the Case Study and PICOT Question
by 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) on Sunday.
Week 4 – Case Study and PICOT Question Development
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
0.0 pts
Content
Contribution
Posts factually
correct,
reflective and
substantive
contribution;
advances
discussion
3.33 pts
Excellent:
Factually
correct,
reflective and
substantive
contribution;
advances
discussion.
3.0 pts
Very Good:
Information
that is
factually
correct; lacks
full
development
of concept or
thought
2.0 pts
Good:
Information
that is
factually
correct; lacks
full
development
of concept or
thought.
1.0 pts
Acceptable:
Repeats but
does not
add
substantive
information
to the
discussion
0.0 pts
Acceptable
(low):
Repeats but
does not add
substantive
information
to the
discussion
Unnaceptable:
Information
that is off-
topic,
incorrect, or
irrelevant to
discussion.
3.33 pts
2.0 pts
References and
Support
Uses
references to
literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments
3.33 pts
Excellent:
Uses
references to
literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments
3.0 pts
Very Good:
Incorporates
some
references
from
literature and
personal
experience.
0.0 pts
Unnaceptable:
No references
1.0 pts
Acceptable:
Uses
personal
experience,
Good: Uses
personal
experience,
and limited
references
to readings
or research.
0.0 pts
Acceptable
(low): Uses
personal
experience,
but no
but no
3.33 pts
references
to readings
or research.
references to
readings or
research.
Clarity and
Mechanics
3.33 pts
2.0 pts
?
Contributes to
discussion with
clear, concise
com.cnnte
Excellent:
Contributes to
discussion with
clear, concise
comments
3.0 pts
Very Good:
Contributes
valuable
information
Good:
Contributes
valuable
information
1.0 pts
0.0 pts
Acceptable: Acceptable
Communicates (low):
in friendly, Vague,
courteous and with
balato
0.0 pts
Unnaceptable:
Long,
unorganized
or rude
????
Samuel Merritt University – MySMU
Grades
People
Imagine you are an NP working in a family practice setting. Your patient is a 26-year-old female who comes in today
complaining of cough, fatigue, and chest pain. Vital signs are all within normal limits. She has been sick for 3 weeks and
anxious to get back to work. She is requesting antibiotics. As her NP, you believe she has viral bronchitis. Your treatment
plan consists of symptomatic management and no antibiotics.
Conferences
Collaborations
Read the case study and document the following on the worksheet:
Panopto Library
ard
•
Student Resources
• Use the PICOT method to develop a searchable question.
Identify one scholarly article to support your recommendation, and include the hyperlink to the article in your
worksheet.
• Develop a treatment plan incorporating the evidence to discuss with your patient.
Faculty Resources
es
Ongoing Feedback
PS
Submit your completed worksheet including a hyperlink to your article to the Case Study and PICOT Question
by 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) on Sunday.
D
dar
Week 4 – Case Study and PICOT Question Development
Criteria
}
Ratings
OX
Pts
elp
Content
Contribution
Posts factually
correct,
reflective and
substantive
contribution;
advances
discussion
3.33 pts
Excellent:
Factually
correct,
reflective and
substantive
contribution;
advances
discussion
3.0 pts
Very Good:
Information
that is
factually
correct; lacks
full
development
of concept or
thought
2.0 pts
Good:
Information
that is
factually
correct; lacks
full
development
of concept or
thought.
1.0 pts
Acceptable:
Repeats but
does not
add
substantive
information
to the
discussion
0.0 pts
Acceptable
(low):
Repeats but
does not add
substantive
information
to the
discussion
0.0 pts
Unnaceptable:
Information
that is off-
topic,
incorrect, or
irrelevant to
discussion.
3.33 pts
2.0 pts
1.0 pts
0.0 pts
References and
Support
Uses
references to
literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments
3.33 pts
Excellent:
Uses
references to
literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments
3.0 pts
Very Good:
Incorporates
some
references
from
literature and
personal
experience.
0.0 pts
Unnaceptable:
No references
Good: Uses
personal
experience,
and limited
references
to readings
or research.
Acceptable:
Uses
personal
experience,
Acceptable
(low): Uses
personal
experience,
but no
but no
3.33 pts
references
to readings
or research.
references to
readings or
research.
3.33 pts
3.0 pts
Clarity and
Mechanics
Contributes to
discussion with
clear, concise
comments
formatted in an
easy to read
style that is
free of
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Excellent:
Contributes to
discussion with
clear, concise
comments
formatted in an
easy to read
style that is free
of grammatical
or spelling
errors.
2.0 pts
Very Good: Good:
Contributes Contributes
valuable valuable
information information
to
to
discussion discussion
with minor
minor clarity clarity or
or
mechanics
mechanics
errors.
errors.
1.0 pts
Acceptable:
Communicates
in friendly,
courteous and
helpful
manner with
some errors in
clarity or
mechanics
0.0 pts
Acceptable
(low):
Vague,
with
several
errors in
clarity or
mechanics
with very
0.0 pts
Unnaceptable:
Long,
unorganized
or rude
content that
may contain
multiple
errors or may
be
inappropriate
3.33 pts
?
Previous
Total Points: 9.99

Purchase answer to see full
attachment