Research in Social Psychology Assignment | Essay Help Services

has changed a great deal in the past 100 years. An examination of modern research, as opposed to classic research, shows differences with regard to the theoretical orientation (e.g., genetics, sociocultural approach, and social learning theory), ethics, and the basic versus applied nature of the research. There are also differences between the classic and current research with regard to its influence on social behavior. The task of this assignment is to select one classic research study in social psychology from a provided list. You will then locate a modern (within the last 10 years) peer-reviewed research study in the same subject area. The article you locate will be submitted for instructor approval. You will analyze these studies for their approach to social psychology, the influence of theories, research trends of the different time periods, the influence of the research on society, and how issues of ethics and ethical strategies differ across time.

PSY 530 Final Project Learning Aid: 10 Classic Studies with Shapiro Library References
1. Stanford Prison Experiment – Phillip Zimbardo
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6–B7.
OR
Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
2. Obedience to Authority – Stanley Milgram
Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76.
3. Cognitive Dissonance and Insufficient Rewards – Leon Festinger
Festinger, L. (1961). The psychological effects of insufficient rewards. American Psychologist, 16(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1037/h0045112
4. Imitation of Aggression – Albert Bandura
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1037/h0048687
5. Bystander Effect – Helping Behavior – John Latane and Bibb Darley
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. doi: 10.1037/h0025589
6. Conformity to a Majority – Solomon Asch Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1–70.
7. Groupthink – Irving Janis
Janis, I. L. (1973). Groupthink and group dynamics: A social psychological analysis of defective policy decisions. Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 19–26.
8. Evolution and Sexual Strategies – David Buss
Buss, D.M. & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–32.
9. Intergroup Conflict and Prejudice – Muzafer Sherif
Sherif, M. (1958) Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 349–356.
10. The Halo Effect – Richard Nisbett
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256.

PSY 530 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The focus of
s ocial p sychology is to understand how a person’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the real or imagined presence o f ot hers. Unlike
s ociology, s ocial p sychology takes th e perspective of the individual rather than the group and examines what makes us engage in behaviors such as aggression,
attraction, altruism, self justification, social cognition, and social perception. With its roots in Gestalt psychology, s ocial p sycholo gy puts its emphasis not on
physical reality, but rather on an individual’s percept ion of the world around them. Historically, this field has played an important role in understanding the
causes of, as well as treatments for social issues such as reducing violen ce, increasing helping behaviors , and assisting people in living healthier and safer
The purpose of this assessment is to recognize the value of social psychology on society thr
oughout its history as a field. You will also analyze research f or how it
changes or does not change based on the time period when it was conducted.
This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
 Analyze social psychological research for how the field has changed over the course of its history
 Assess the impact of social psychological research trends for their influence on human behavior
 Analyze elements of social psychological research for their influence on improving social welfare
 Evaluate the influence of social psychological research on society for its efficacy for social change
 Analyze ethical issues in social psychological research for determining appropriate strategies for use in scientific research
The project is divided in
to three milestones , which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final
submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three , Five , and Seven . The final product will be submitted in Module Nine.
Prompt
Research in
s ocial p sychology has changed a gre at deal in the past 100 years. An examination of modern research as opposed to classic research shows
differences with regard to the theoretical orientation (e.g. genetics, sociocultural approach, and social learning theory) ethics, and the basic v ersu s applied
nature of the research. There are also differences between the classic and current research with regard to its influence on social behavior.
The task of this assignment is
to select one classic research study in social psychology from a provide d list. You will then locate a modern (within the last 10 years)
peer reviewed research study in the same subject area. The article you locate will be submitted for instructor approval. You will analyze these studies for their
approach to social psychology , the influence of theories, research trends of the different time periods, the influence of the research on society, and how issues of
ethics and ethical strategies differ across time.
Specifically, the following
critical elements must be addressed:

Introduction : F or this part of the assessment, you will:
A. Briefly summarize the research question, results, and conclusions reached by the authors of each study you have chosen.
B. Describe the social psychological approach es used in each of the chosen studies and justify why you believe that authors of the studies used
these approaches.
C. Analyze the studies for the theories and past research you believe were used by the authors of the studies that informed their approach.
D. Analyze the a pproaches used by the authors in each of the chosen studies for how they do or do not demonstrate how the field of social
psychology has changed over time . In other words, how are the approaches used by the authors in each of the chosen studies similar or
different? How do they demonstrate how the field has or has not changed over the course of its history?
II. Human Behavior : For this part of the assessment, you will analyze each of your chosen studies for how they might have influenced the development of
human behavior in society.
A. Explain how the research trends in social psychology in the different time periods of both studies may have informed the direction of the
research. In other words, how did the research trends of the time influence the researchers in developing their study? Be sur e to support your
response with appropriate evidence.
B. Assess how, once published and conveyed to the public, the results and conclusions reached by the researchers of the chosen studies may have
influenced human behaviors.
C. Assess how the chosen studies were or were not aligned with the established research trends of the time, and how tha t may have affected how
they were received by the public. Be sure to support your response with appropriate evidence.
III. Influence on Society : For this part of the assessment, you will evaluate the impact of the chosen studies in terms of how th ey have instigated social
change and how they have benefited society. You should consider researching the historical context of the chosen study to sup port your responses.
A. Analyze the chosen studies for elements of the research that you believe may have b een a benefit to society at any point in time and be sure to
justify your response.
B. Analyze the chosen studies for elements of the research that you believe may have had a negative impact on society at any point in time and be
sure to justify your response.
C. Explain possible ways that the results or conclusions of the studies could be applied to everyday life in modern society.
D. Evaluate the chosen studies for how they may have influenced events of social change (positiv ely or negatively). Be sure to provide examples to
support your response.
E. Describe a personal or professional experience in which elements of social psychological research could be applied to help influence change.
F. Explain how influential you believe social psychological research has been on changing behavior in society. If you believe it is not influential,
explain why
IV. Ethical Considerations : For this part of the assessment, you will analyze each of the chosen st udies for ethical issues that might be present, and examine
how the time period may have influenced the ethical strategies of the researchers.
A. Analyze each of the chosen studies for any potential ethical issues that may be present in their research design. If there are no potential ethical
issues, explain why. Be sure to consider issues with research design as well as the impact of the experiment on the participa nts.

Guidelines for
Submission Your research study comparative analysis should adhere to the following formatting requirements: 8 10 pages in length, with 12
point Times New Roman font, one inch margins, double spacing, and APA formatting and citations.
Critical Elements
Exemplary
100% Proficient
90% Needs Improvement
70% Not Evident
0% Value
Introduction: Summary
M
eets “Proficient” criteria and
summary demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of the
research question, results, and
conclusions reached by the
authors of each study chosen
Briefly summarizes the research
question, results, and conclusions
reached by the authors of each
study chosen
Summarizes the research
question, results, and conclusions
reache d by the authors of each
study chosen but summary is
cursory or not brief
Does not summarize the research
question, results, and conclusions
reached by the authors of each
study chosen
5
Introduction:
Approaches
M
eets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates how
the approach used by researchers
influences the research process
Describes the social psychological
approach used in each of the
chosen studies and justifies why
the authors used these
approaches
Describes the social psycho
logical
approach used in each of the
chosen studies but description of
the approach is cursory or
inaccurate or does not justify
response
Does not describe the social
psychological approach used in
each of the chosen studies
6
Introduction: Theories
and Past Research
M
eets “Proficient” criteria and
analysis demonstrates keen
insight into how theories and
past research are used in the
research process
Analyzes the studies for the
theories and past research used
by the authors of the studies that
informed their approach
Analyzes the studies for the
theories and past research used
by the authors of the studies that
informed their approach but
analysis is cursory or inaccurate
Does not analyze the studies for
the theories and past research
used by the authors of the
studies that informed their
approach
6
Introduction: Changed
Over Time
M
eets “Proficient” criteria and
analysis demonstrates a nuanced
understanding of how the time
period in which a study takes
place influences the research
process
Analyzes the approaches used by
the authors of the studies for
how they do or do not
demonstrate how the field of
social psychology has changed
over time
Analyzes the approaches used by
the authors of the studies for
how they do or do not
demonstrate how the field of
social psychology has changed
over time but analysis is cursory
or inaccurate
Does not analyze the approaches
used by the authors of the
studies for how they do or do not
demonstrate how the field of
social psychology has chan ged
over time
6
Human Behavior:
Different Time Periods
M
eets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of how
the time period in which a study
takes place influences the
research process
Explains how the
research trends
in social psychology in the
different time periods of both
studies may have informed the
direction of the research and
supports response using
appropriate evidence
Explains how the research trends
in social psychology in the
different time periods of both
studies may have informed the
direction of the research but
explanation is cursory or does
not support response with
evidence
Does not explain how the
research trends in social
psychology in the different time
periods of both studies may h ave
informed the direction of the
research
6