PSYC 575B02 Liberty Impact of False Memory in The Criminal Justice System HW Research Paper Instructions You will write a research paper that discusses an

PSYC 575B02 Liberty Impact of False Memory in The Criminal Justice System HW Research Paper Instructions

You will write a research paper that discusses and evaluates the current research in the field of false memories. As a formal research paper, it must be completely focused on the empirical evidence pertaining to the topic. Refrain from discussing your personal opinions or experiences. You must use scholarly sources for your references; do not use a textbook, website, or popular press as a source. For more information on what a scholarly source is and how to find it, see the supplemental material provided in the Additional Resources folder.

The paper must include the following:

12–14 pages of content (not including title page, abstract, and reference page)
Title, abstract and reference page
Current APA 7 formatting throughout
At least 12 peer-reviewed journal articles
A discussion of the important limitations of the evidence (studies) presented
A discussion of conflicting evidence for any of the studies discussed

The organization of this paper must be as follows:

Title Page 1 page

Abstract 120–150 words

Introduction 1–2 paragraphs

Thesis statement: one sentence that states the focus of your paper

Key Points (include 3–5 main points)
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Point 5

Body of Paper 8–10 pages

Topic sentence and supporting research for each of your key points. Use the same order as in the introduction.

Research Concept/Finding
Research Concept/Finding
Supporting evidence
Connect to next concept/finding
Research Concept/Finding
Supporting evidence
Connect to next concept/finding

Summary 1–2 pages

Write a summary sentence that wraps up the concepts discussed in the paper.

Summary sentence must be followed by clear statements that summarize each of the main concepts/findings discussed in the body.

Conclusion 1 paragraph

Final thoughts in a paragraph

References At least 12 peer-reviewed journal articles References
Clark, S. E., & Godfrey, R. D. (2009). Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 22-42.
McAllister, H. A., Baiamonte, B. A., Ory, J. H., & Scherer, J. A. (2011). The effect of wanted posters on
prospective and retrospective memory . Law and Human Behavior , 104-109.
Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & van Koppen, P. J. (2008). Eyewitness Memory of a Supermarket Robbery: A
Case Study of Accuracy and Confidence After 3 Months. Law and Human Behavior , 506-514.
Pezdek, K., Sperry, K., & Owens, S. M. (2007). Interviewing Witnesses: The Effect of Forced
Confabulation on Event Memory. Law and Human Behavior , 463-477.
Smeets, T., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Otgaar, H. (2016). Dangerously Neglecting Courtroom
Realities. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 26-27.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment