NRS 493 Grand Canyon University Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a sp

NRS 493 Grand Canyon University Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team.

Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed.

Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:

The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed.
A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice.
A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice.

You are required to cite to a minimum of eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Plan your time accordingly to complete this assignment. Course Code
NRS-493
Class Code
NRS-493-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal
5.0%
Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is
Observed
10.0%
Detailed Description of Project Topic
15.0%
Effect of Identified Problem or Issue
15.0%
Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing
Practice
15.0%
Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic
and Implications for Nursing Practice
15.0%
Peer-Reviewed Articles
5.0%
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative,
educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team
project that will be the focus of the change proposal is
omitted.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue,
intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or
collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed
is omitted.
A description of the project topic is omitted.
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality
initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional
team project is omitted.
Significance of topic and its implications for nursing practice is
omitted.
A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an
explanation of how it will affect nursing practice is omitted.
Fewer than six peer-reviewed articles are presented.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
60.0
Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative,
educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team
project that will be the focus of the change proposal is
presented but is largely incomplete.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue,
intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or
collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed
is presented but is largely incomplete.
A description of the project topic is presented but is largely
incomplete.
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality
initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional
team project is presented but is largely incomplete.
Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.
Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.
Fewer than seven peer-reviewed articles are presented.
Overall, only five articles meet the assignment criteria.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative,
educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team
project that will be the focus of the change proposal is
summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some
support is needed.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue,
intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or
collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed
is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
Some support is needed.
A description of the project topic is presented. There are
some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality
initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional
team project is summarized. There are some omissions or
inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some
omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some
omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only six
articles meet the assignment criteria.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (89.00%)
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative,
educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team
project that will be the focus of the change proposal is
presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue,
intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or
collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed
is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
A description of the project topic is presented. Minor aspects
are unclear or require support.
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality
initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional
team project is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or
require support.
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or
require support.
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or
require support.
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only
seven articles meet the assignment criteria.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative,
educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team
project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly
and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue,
intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or
collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed
is logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
A detailed description of the project topic is clearly and
logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality
initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional
team project is clearly and logically presented. Support and
rationale are evident.
Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support
and rationale are evident.
Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support
and rationale are evident.
Comments
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented, and each article
clearly meets the assignment criteria.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment