NRS 428VN Waldorf University Healthcare Policy Development Paper minimum 750 words needed NO PLAGIARISM !! 1.4 Participate in health care policy develop

NRS 428VN Waldorf University Healthcare Policy Development Paper minimum 750 words needed

NO PLAGIARISM !!

1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.

Research public health issues on the “Climate Change” or “Topics and Issues” pages of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website. Investigate a public health issue related to an environmental issue within the U.S. health care delivery system and examine its effect on a specific population.

Write a 750-1,000-word policy brief that summarizes the issue, explains the effect on the population, and proposes a solution to the issue.

Follow this outline when writing the policy brief:

Describe the policy health issue. Include the following information: (a) what population is affected, (b) at what level does it occur (local, state, or national), and (c) evidence about the issues supported by resources.
Create a problem statement.
Provide suggestions for addressing the health issue caused by the current policy. Describe what steps are required to initiate policy change. Include necessary stakeholders (government officials, administrator) and budget or funding considerations, if applicable.
Discuss the impact on the health care delivery system.

Include three peer-reviewed sources and two other sources to support the policy brief.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Course Code
NRS-428VN
Class Code
NRS-428VN-IO6220
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Description of Policy Health Issue
20.0%
Problem Statement
20.0%
Suggestions for Addressing the Policy Health
Issue (C 1.4 Participate in health care policy
development to influence nursing practice and
health care.)
20.0%
Impact on Health Care Delivery System
20.0%
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Policy Brief
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Description of the policy issue is omitted.
A problem statement is not included.
Suggestions for addressing the policy health issue are not
included.
A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system
is not included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
120.0
Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)
An incomplete description of the policy issue is presented.
The origin of this policy is unclear. There is no evidence that
this policy creates a health issue, or that it is an issue for the
population selected. The level at which the issue occurs has
not been identified. There are major inaccuracies.
A problem statement is present but lacks detail or is
incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Suggestions for addressing the policy health issue are
incomplete. Suggestions do not include all assignment
criteria. The suggestions do not support policy change for the
policy health issue.
A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system
is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject
knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (88.00%)
A description of the policy issue is summarized. The origin of
the policy is described, but it is unclear why the policy creates
a health issue for the population selected. The level at which
the issue occurs is identified. There are some inaccuracies.
More information and rationale are needed.
A problem statement is present. Some subject knowledge is
evident.r
Suggestions for addressing the issue are present. Some
subject knowledge is evident. Most assignment criteria are
met. The suggestions generally outline steps for policy
change. More information or evidence is needed.
A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system
is present. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (92.00%)
A general description of the policy issue is presented. The
origin of the policy is described and a correlation between the
policy and the health issue for the population selected is
established. The level at which this occurs is discussed. Some
rationale or detail is needed for clarity.
A problem statement is included, and subject knowledge is
competent.
Suggestions for addressing the issue are present, and subject
knowledge is competent. All assignment criteria are met. The
suggestions outline steps for policy change. Minor detail is
needed for clarity.
A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system
is present, and subject knowledge is competent.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
A detailed description of the policy issue is presented. The
origin of the policy is described and a strong correlation
between the policy and the health issue for the population
selected is established. The level at which this occurs is
discussed. Strong rationale and evidence are offered for
support. Insight into the policy health issue is demonstrated.
A problem statement is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
Suggestions for addressing the issue are thoroughly
developed with supporting details. All assignment criteria are
met and well-supported. The suggestions are well-supported
and offer clear steps for initiating policy change.
A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system
is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment