MN505 Purdue Global University Unit 2 Lung Cancer Screening Paper Directions Review the clinician provider guidelines and recommendations of the United St

MN505 Purdue Global University Unit 2 Lung Cancer Screening Paper Directions

Review the clinician provider guidelines and recommendations of the United States Preventive Task Force A and B Recommendations.

For the MSN prepared nurse, knowledge of epidemiology and its application to preventive screening guidelines is important in many clinical areas: administrative, education, and nurse practitioner fields. Consider you are working in a clinic and need to order a preventive screening on a patient for one of the conditions listed below. (While this is a preventative measure, it also can be a diagnostic tool in other circumstances. For this Assignment the screening is a secondary prevention measure.

Please select one screening. Your screening methodology must come from the the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Breast Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Colon Cancer
Diabetes Mellitus II
Lung Cancer

Explain the guideline, the correct application of the screening, and the epidemiology behind the guidance. Content required should include epidemiologic data such as statistical information as available ex. morbidity, mortality, incidence and prevalence of condition. Identify risk factors, risk assessment, testing interval, description of the patient population, screening test recommendations and other factors relative to the guideline.

Textbook Readings

Chapter 4: “Risk: Basic Principles”

Chapter 5: “Risk: Exposure to Disease”

Chapter 6: “Risk: From Disease to Exposure”

LINK TO BOOK : https://books.google.com/books?id=sOaXYZW8Kh0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Clinical+Epidemiology:+The+Essentials+Edition:+5th+(2012)&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBorniu7DjAhWFLc0KHUPTBjkQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

Assignment Requirements: Minimum requirement of at least three peer reviewed citation. ALL SOURCES MUST BE LESS ThaN 5 YEARS OLDI have attached the grading rubric. Paper must follow all details in rubric and in this post in order to be ACCEPTED.

Master’s-prepared nurse educators, leaders, nurse practitioners and all specialty nursing fields are contributors to health promotion in populations across the life span. You will demonstrate understanding and correct interpretations of preventive screening guidelines. You should be able to apply this knowledge to your specialty focus as it relates to health promotion and epidemiology.

This paper should be 2–3 pages, excluding your title page, and references. This paper should adhere to appropriate 6thedition APA format.

NO Plagiarism or assignment will not be accepted. PLEASE FOLLOW assignment post as well as rubric to ensure that everything in the requirement is met prior to submitting this to me. Unit 2: Individual Screening
Condition and
screening
Introductory
Emergent
Practiced
0 -1.9
2 – 2.9
3 – 3.9
Condition and type of
Condition or type of screening
screening methodology is
methodology is not identified. selected but not clearly defined
and has errors.
Condition and type of
screening methodology is
selected but not defined.
Epidemiology of
Condition
Epidemiology of condition is
not identified.
Epidemiology of condition is
weakly discussed and may
have errors.
Epidemiology of condition is
addressed; detail is limited
Methodology
Methodology is not applied to a
specific population.
Methodology is properly applied to
a specific population, may have
errors or missing key elements of
risks and related factors
Methodology is applied to a
specific population addressing
some risks and related factors;
detail is limited
Guidelines
followed
United States Preventive Services
United States Preventive Services
United States Preventive Services
Task Force guidelines are not
Task Force guidelines are not
Task Force guidelines are
applied appropriately to the
selected or identified.
identified; detail is limited.
screening methodology. Detail is
limited.
Critical Analysis
No literature review included.
Review is not comprehensive,
little evidence of critical analysis
and research.
Review is present but not
comprehensive, studies are
represented, limited evidence of
critical analysis.
Literature
support
No literature review sources are
included.
Provides 1 scholarly source for
literature support.
Provides 3-2 scholarly sources for
literature support.
Format/Style
APA format is not utilized. No
obvious attempt made to cite
ideas and information from other
sources. There are consistent and
repeated errors in rules of
grammar, word usage, and
punctuation. There are consistent
and repeated spelling and/or
proofreading errors. Overall style
is not at all consistent with formal,
professional work.
There are frequent repeated
There are some errors, but much
errors in consistency of the text,
of the text, title page, and
title page, and references page references page is consistent with
with APA format. There are
the APA format. Ideas and
numerous errors in which ideas information from other sources are
and information from other
cited correctly with few
sources are not cited correctly.
exceptions. Rules of grammar,
There are numerous errors in
word usage, and punctuation are
rules of grammar, word usage,
followed with few exceptions.
and punctuation. There are
Assignment has few spelling
numerous spelling and/or
and/or proofreading errors.
proofreading errors. Overall style
Overall style is adequate for
is inadequate for formal,
formal, professional work; some
professional work; many areas
areas need style improvement.
needs need style improvement.
Total available points =
100
4
Proficient/Mastered
Score
Weight
4
Final
Score
Condition and type of
screening methodology is
clearly defined.
4
10%
0.40
Epidemiology of condition is
well addressed;
comprehensive and
appropriately
4
10%
0.40
Methodology is properly applied to
a specific population addressing
risks and related factors
4
10%
0.40
4
15%
0.60
4
25%
1.00
4
10%
0.40
4
20%
0.80
100%
4.00
United States Preventive Services
Task Force guidelines are
identified correctly and are
relevant to the screening
methodology.
Provides appropriate literature
support, derived from nursing
scholarly journals and other social
science literature, as evidence for
their chosen screening.
Discussion demonstrates critical
analysis of strengths and
weaknesses of the chosen
screening methodology and
guideline support.
Provides 4 or more scholarly
sources for literature support.
Text, title page, and references
page are consistent with APA
format. Ideas and information from
other sources are cited correctly.
Rules of grammar, word usage,
and punctuation are followed.
Assignment is spellchecked and
proofread. Overall style is
demonstrates excellent
consistency with that expected of
formal, professional work.
Final Score
100
Percentage
100.00%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment