Week three homework
Overview of the Case:
It is described as a classic Prima Donna doctors vs. nurses and staff situation. It is a typical hospital (even academic) scenario of the battle between the highly educated specialists bringing in the work and doing the work and those supporting them. On the physicians side there is a newly appointed, representative chief of surgery, Don, who is at war with Mary, the 13-year veteran OR director. Mary has been working at Lincoln for 13 years, getting the job done with no complaints and no nonsense. Not only are Don and Mary at war but their respective staffs are described as being at oIDs as well.
A third party is invited in to intervene and interviews Don, Mary, and their respective staff. The interviews reveal a lot of finger pointing and a lot of blaming the problem on one person or one group (i.e., the physicians or the nurses). The practitioner decides the conflict between the leaders was the root of the more systemic problem. The intervention chosen was third party conflict resolution.
Meetings were conducted with Don and Mary separately to provide their answers to three questions to the third party. The questions were:
The mere act of answering the question seems to soften each towards understanding their part in the problem. Then they share their answers with each other with the practitioner present. Hearing the answer to the first question of what they did well softens them further and paves the way to resolve their differences. The two then agree on changes they were willing to make to their own behavior and practices and agreed on ways to support the other to be successful. Three VPs were present along with the practitioner and the two leaders and agreements were documented. Four periodic meetings were scheduled after this with all six involved to assess progress. Significant improvement was noted.
Is third-party intervention an appropriate intervention in this case? Other possible OD interventions?
Week four homework
Week Four Case Discussion (no less than 150 words)
Overview of the case:
In an effort to stem declining service department revenues and low customer satisfaction index (CSI) ratings, Bob Deshane, the Service Director of Sharpe BMW had devised a new plan that changes the way service technicians are compensated. The plan calls for a bonus to be paid to service technicians when they perform a repair job that is covered by manufacturers warranty. Because warranty jobs pay a technician less than repair jobs paid for by the customer, Deshane hopes that the bonus plan will motivate technicians to perform warranty jobs well so that the dealerships CSI ratings will go up. The task of implementing the bonus plan falls to Tom Dunn, the newly appointed Service Manager. Dunn has to come up with a detailed plan to implement this organizational change.
What do you see as the pros and cons of the proposed bonus plan?
All homework need reference
Week three homework due on 19/10/2016 before 10:00pm PST
Week four homework due on 26/10/2016 before 10:00pm PST
Economic Debate- Progressive Income Tax For this Economic Debate, we are going to discuss the…
TOPIC: Going Global Discussion Thread 1 (initial post due Wednesday for full credit) Please note:…
Assignment Topic This week will culminate in the creation of a narrated PowerPoint to create…
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted…
you need to post your 2-page information flier to share with your Final Project Group.…
discussion: Discuss the methods used at your company to measure and ensure quality products and…