Interview of PE Teacher Assignment | Online Assignment

Interview a physical educator and post your completed assignment as a MS Word document. Be sure to follow the assignment guidelines and complete your assignment as a professional, scholarly submission. MUST FOLLOW attached rubric I will fill in the information about the teacher and location. stick to the rubric please.

Kin
321:
Theory
of
Physical
Education
Interview
Assignment
(50
Points)
You
must
locate
and
interview
a
physical
education
teacher
within
a
K-­‐12
setting,
to
get
a
perception
of
physical
education
instruction
from
a
practicing
professional
in
the
field.
If
you
identify
an
elementary
school
teacher,
ensure
that
he/she
provides
regular
physical
education
instruction.
Use
the
following
questions
to
guide
you
through
the
interview.
Your
completed
interview
summary
is
to
be
typed
(following
APA
guidelines)
and
submitted
on
the
due
date.
Include
the
listed
questions
as
headings
in
your
final
summary.
General
Information
to
obtain
Name
of
interviewee
Location
of
workplace
Description
and
demographics
of
workplace

1. How
   long
   have
   you
   been
   teaching
   PE?
2. How
   or
   why
   did
   you
   decide
   to
   teach
   PE?
3. What
   are
   some
   issues
   that
   have
   changed
   PE
   instruction
   over
   the
   past
   few
   years?
4. What
   would
   you
   like
   to
   see
   changed
   in
   physical
   education
   instruction
   or
   curriculum?
5. Did
   you
   major
   in
   Kinesiology
   and
   have
   a
   P.E.
   credential?
   What
   knowledge
   did
   you
   have
   to
   gain
   to
   teach
   physical
   education?
6. How
   much
   time
   is
   allotted
   per
   week
   for
   PE
   instruction
   in
   your
   school?
7. What
   is
   (are)
   the
   main
   goal(s)
   for
   PE
   in
   your
   school?
8. What
   is
   one
   of
   the
   biggest
   challenges
   to
   teaching
   PE?
9. What
   are
   three
   of
   your
   PE
   units?
   How
   long
   is
   each
   unit?
10. How
    are
    students
    graded,
    assessed,
    or
    given
    credit
    for
    PE?
11. What
    do
    you
    consider
    to
    be
    the
    best
    thing
    about
    teaching
    PE?
12. What
    would
    be
    some
    advise
    you
    would
    give
    someone
    who
    is
    thinking
    of
    becoming
    a
    PE
    teacher?
    Provide
    a
    comprehensive
    and
    reflective
    summary
    review
    of
    your
    interview.
    Provide
    any
    additional
    thoughts
    or
    information
    not
    addresses
    from
    the
    list
    of
    questions.
    Compare
    the
    responses
    with
    information
    discussed
    in
    class
    or
    read
    in
    the
    textbook.
    Unacceptable
    60%-­‐00%
    Average
    70%-­‐79%
    Acceptable
    80%-­‐89%
    Exemplary
    90%-­‐100%
    APA
    Formatting
    (4
    points
    possible)
    Multiple
    components
    are
    missing
    and/or
    multiple
    errors
    are
    visible
    throughout
    the
    document.
    There
    are
    3-­‐4
    APA
    formatting
    components
    missing
    and/or
    3-­‐4
    errors
    visible
    throughout
    the
    document
    There
    are
    1-­‐2
    APA
    formatting
    components
    missing
    and/or
    1-­‐2
    errors
    visible
    throughout
    the
    document.
    Includes
    cover
    page
    (with
    all
    necessary
    information),
    double-­‐spaced,
    times
    new
    roman
    font,
    size
    12,
    appropriate
    listing
    of
    sources
    and
    citation
    on
    a
    reference
    page,
    1
    inch
    margins.
    Mechanics
    (4
    points
    possible)
    Multiple
    spelling,
    grammar,
    and/or
    punctuation
    errors.
    There
    are
    3-­‐4
    spelling,
    grammar,
    and/or
    punctuation
    errors
    visible.
    There
    are
    1-­‐2
    spelling,
    grammar,
    and/or
    punctuation
    errors
    visible.
    No
    visible
    spelling,
    grammar,
    and/or
    punctuation
    errors.
    Content
    (26
    points
    possible)
    Content
    is
    very
    vague,
    unclear,
    unfocused,
    and/or
    does
    not
    address
    many
    of
    the
    questions,
    and/or
    does
    not
    provide
    examples
    or
    details.
    Content
    includes
    some
    detail,
    topic
    focus
    is
    inconsistent,
    few
    questions
    and
    components
    of
    assignment
    are
    addressed,
    and
    few
    details
    and/or
    examples
    are
    used
    to
    support
    content.
    Content
    includes
    details,
    is
    mostly
    relevant
    and
    focused
    on
    topic,
    most
    questions
    and
    components
    of
    assignment
    are
    addressed,
    and
    some
    details
    and/or
    examples
    are
    used
    to
    support
    content.
    Content
    is
    detailed
    and
    relevant,
    focused
    on
    topic,
    all
    questions
    and
    components
    of
    assignment
    are
    addressed,
    specific
    details
    and/or
    examples
    are
    used
    to
    support
    content.
    Organization
    (8
    points
    possible)
    Poorly
    organized
    document,
    does
    not
    follow
    a
    clear
    writing
    path,
    content
    is
    not
    organized,
    thoughts
    are
    vague
    and
    consistently
    off
    topic.
    Content
    has
    some
    organization,
    attempts
    to
    adhere
    to
    guidelines
    with
    many
    errors,
    writer
    often
    strays,
    and
    thoughts
    are
    not
    always
    consistent.
    Content
    is
    mostly
    organized,
    seems
    to
    adhere
    to
    guidelines,
    a
    logical
    writing
    path
    is
    followed,
    but
    writer
    strays
    periodically,
    thoughts
    are
    mostly
    clear
    and
    consistent.
    Information
    is
    well
    organized,
    adheres
    to
    guidelines,
    follows
    logical
    path,
    thoughts
    are
    clear
    and
    consistent,
    and
    all
    organization
    guidelines
    are
    followed.
    Scholarly
    Writing
    (8
    points
    possible)
    Writing
    does
    not
    flow
    well,
    is
    not
    clear,
    concise,
    and/or
    comprehensive,
    improper
    transitions
    used,
    no
    usage
    of
    high-­‐
    level
    vocabulary.
    Writing
    does
    not
    flow
    well,
    is
    not
    clear,
    concise,
    and
    comprehensive,
    little
    to
    no
    use
    of
    academic
    vocabulary,
    unclear
    and/or
    vague
    transitions.
    Acceptable
    (good)
    writing
    skills:
    writing
    flows
    well,
    mostly
    clear,
    concise,
    and
    comprehensive.
    Used
    some
    improper
    or
    lower
    level
    vocabulary,
    no
    clear
    use
    of
    transitions.
    Demonstrates
    exemplary
    writing,
    high
    academic
    level
    of
    work,
    effective
    use
    of
    vocabulary,
    clear,
    concise,
    and
    comprehensive,
    effective
    use
    of
    transitions.