Houston Community College Difference Between Deontology and Utilitarianism HW In the word document below is 4 assignments. All will require the textbook (T

Houston Community College Difference Between Deontology and Utilitarianism HW In the word document below is 4 assignments. All will require the textbook (The Fundamentals of Ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University) by Landau, Russ Shafer.As you complete each assignment, Add your finished SWS (Six word Sentences) below each assignment. Each require 15 six word sentences and there are examples listed in the textbook. ALL WILL REQUIRE this Textbook : Landau, Russ Shafer. The Fundamentals of Ethics. 4th ed. New York:
Oxford University
Use the textbook, and the SWS listed below to prepare fifteen six-word sentences to show your
understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the utilitarian language game. Why is it or is it not
rational to be utilitarian?
Create your response using the four-paragraph format. (Body , Core 1 Core 2, Conclusion)
Pain and pleasure balancing is complex.
Consequentialism places unrealistic pressure on predictability.
First responder training eliminates indecision.
Direct action replaces Indecisive contemplating.
Ignorance of the future is human.
The human condition, a finite life.
The good maximizes the overall well-being.
Rules always risk failure its human.
Finite humans have not perfect rules.
Every good rule causes bad outcomes.
The majority is the accidentally right action.
Majority rule is good by accident.
Consequences and means must improve well-being.
(RA9)
Use the textbook, and the SWS listed below to prepare fifteen six-word sentences to show your
understanding of consequentialism as three options for taking the moral action base on the foreseeable
consequences in a given circumstance:
Create your response using the four-paragraph format. (Body ,Core 1, Core 2, Conclusion.)
Egoism -never self-denying (See Chapter 8)
Altruism – always self-denying (See Chapter 7 and the Index)
Utilitarianism – seeking to balance the happiness, pleasure, and harmony of the community as a
whole. Utilitarianism is not the oppression of the minority by the majority. (see Chapter 9 and Chapter
10)
Egoism seeks consequence benefiting his well-being.
Altruism seeks consequences benefiting other’s well-being.
Utilitarianism seeks consequence benefiting overall well-being.
Utilitarianism looks like the following expressions.
Do all the good you can.
Do good by all possible means.
Optimific means maximizing the good consequences.
Maximizing the overall happiness and pleasure.
Maximizing the overall harmony of society.
Knowing outcomes doesn’t ensure right action.
Society’s overall well-being supersedes your well-being.
Society’s overall well-being isn’t necessarily popularity.
Neither populism nor the majority rule.
Overall well-being minimizes or eliminates suffering.
(RA12)
Use the textbook, and the SWS listed below to prepare fifteen six-word sentences to show your
understanding of a language game focused on Autonomy And Respect.
Benevolence isn’t a central moral virtue.
A better result doesn’t override duty.
Moral actions require our free actions.
Moral actions don’t depend on results.
Moral action from duty is just.
Past actions, not results determine justice.
Happiness and well-being don’t override duty.
Justice is a central moral virtue.
Reason identifies all absolute moral virtues.
Autonomy, negative liberty, leave me alone.
Autonomy, positive liberty, don’t exclude me.
Autonomy is limited by rational duty.
is your rational duty your well-being?
Is human well-being disinterested passionless duty?
Is reason, without passion moral guidance?
Autonomy, negative liberty expects diversity.
Autonomy, diversity, reason, and sentiment conflict.
—Slavery and rape dehumanize the other.
-Kant’s deontology permits no duty exception.
Kant’s deontology forbids one to lie.
Kant, never lie under any circumstance.
Duty takes absolute priority over emotion.
Duty takes absolute priority over outcomes.
A friend’s happiness is my Hell.
Autonomy as liberty authorizes individual diversity.
Diversity confuses orderly universal moral standards.
Universal moral standards are not ahistorical.
Ahistorical moral standards are absolute.
Absolute moral standards are intrinsically valuable.
Intrinsic value is perhaps fully irresistible.
Fully irresistible values cannot be rejected.
Rejecting certain values is moral autonomy.
Autonomy challenges orderly universal moral standards.
Ethics isn’t a science seeking truths.
A universal moral truth eliminates autonomy.
Moral rules aren’t universal and objective.
Autonomy as liberty rejects monistic value.
Unhappiness might be a rational response.
Attitudinal pleasures are acts of enjoyment.
-I believe I feel; I find no I to be my I.
-Student: “You’re happy and still a jerk.”
Who’s the happy Jerk, the speaker?
Use the textbook, the SWS and the other information included here to prepare fifteen six-word
sentences to show your understanding of the difference between Deontology and Utilitarianism–They
do not mix! Remember Kant’s Deontology includes the duty to never, ever, under any circumstances
whatsoever lie.
Use : Chapter 11 The Kantian Perspective: Fairness And Justice
Examples–Things we can say about Deontology:
Kant’s deontology permits no duty exception.
Kant’s deontology forbids one to lie.
Kant, never lie under any circumstance.
Duty takes absolute priority over emotion.
Duty takes absolute priority over outcome.
The outcome is not morality relevant.
Duty from moral law is moral.
Now invent your own great sentences.
Is “Never lie” a contradictory duty?
Telling the truth doesn’t cause contradictions.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment