Grossmont College Influence of Dirty War to Argentine Press Article Discussion This is what my teacher comment on my essay “You have too many sources in yo

Grossmont College Influence of Dirty War to Argentine Press Article Discussion This is what my teacher comment on my essay “You have too many sources in your review, and as a result, this resulted in an essay with no clear focus to it. I’m going to ask you to rewrite this, but stay with the JSTOR article, don’t waste your time with extra sources. Focus on one article, summarize it and comment on it. ”

REQUIREMENTS:

1.THE REPORT IS TO BE 5-6 PAGES IN LENGTH. PLEASE BE SURE TO USE BOTH A TITLE PAGE AND WORKS CITED PAGE. (TITLE AND WORKS CITED PAGES DO NOT COUNT TOWARD THE OVERALL PAGE COUNT OF YOUR REVIEW) YOU ARE ALSO ENCOURAGED TO FOLLOW THE MLA OR CHICAGO FORMATS TO DEVELOP THIS REPORT. PLEASE DOUBLE-SPACE YOUR REVIEW.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LINK OF SOURCE where you have to take the source. Please delete all other sources and focus on one source as mentioned. Just focus on one article “the dirty war. ” Rewrite most of them to make it one source with correct summary and commentary and other requirements below:

click here for my essay that I didnot get any grade for cuz of not focusing on main point

2. In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points that the author is trying to convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type of article is this? Is the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background? As for the second point of discussion, this is where you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You are definitely encouraged to write in first person singular (I feel that…, I think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your JSTOR review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 & 1⁄2 pages summary and 1 & 1⁄2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.

Please follow the requirements and no Plagiarism: