Categories: Uncategorized

GM501 PUGlobal Unit 1 Gender Discrimination Management And Leadership ALL WORK MUST BE ORIGINAL AND NO PLAGIARISM. WORK MUST BE 3 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE AND

GM501 PUGlobal Unit 1 Gender Discrimination Management And Leadership ALL WORK MUST BE ORIGINAL AND NO PLAGIARISM. WORK MUST BE 3 PAGES EXCLUDING
TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGE. ALL REFERENCES AND IN TEXT CITATIONS MUST BE
FROM PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS OR ARTICLES ONLY. YOU MUST USE THE TEMPLATE I
PROVIDE WITH THE GRADING RUBRIC AT THE END OF IT1.
Choose a people issue – major people issue – such as a merger,
downsizing, gender discrimination, cultural diversity, etc. Go to the
Internet and search for that issue and find companies that are or have
experienced that issue. Running head: UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
Unit One Assignment – Annotated Bibliography
Purdue Global University
GM501-01: Management Theories and Practices II
March 18, 2019
1
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
2
Unit One Assignment – Annotated Bibliography
Academic Article/Annotation Format
The following peer-reviewed article has been secured from the Virtual Library at Purdue
Global University. The article has been formatted using the APA hanging indent format. The
article reference is shown below and in the References page.
Hunsaker, P., Pavett, C., & Hunsaker, J. (2011). Increasing student-learning team effectiveness
with team charters. Journal of Education for Business, 86(3), 127-139.
doi:10.1080/08832323.2010.489588
Author Credibility
All three authors have extensive academic and professional credentials. P. Hunsaker
earned a DBA, University of Southern California, Organizational Behavior, Social Psychology
and Management (Hunsaker, n.d.). J. Hunsaker earned a PhD, University of WisconsinMilwaukee, Urban Education, Business Administration and Sociology (Hunsaker, n.d.). Pavett
earned a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Business Administration and Management (Pavett, n.d.).
Each author has published several articles and books including Pavett who in addition to
significant publications has also served as a reviewer of professional articles for publication
(Pavett, n.d.). J. Hunsaker has published more than 50 articles, including a book on gender issues
in the workplace, Strategies and Skills for Managerial Women (Hunsaker, n.d.). P. Hunsaker has
authored more than 100 articles in academic and professional journals and 14 books on
management and organizational behavior (Hunsaker, n.d.).
Intended Audience
The intended audience includes students who are planning on forming teams and those
students who are already participating in teams. Also, the authors are targeting instructors and
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
3
business educators overseeing and guiding the efforts of those students. Due to the increased
usage of team assignments not only in the classroom environment but also in the business and
professional environment, there has been an increased number of problems occurring during the
completion of the team assignments (Hunsaker, Pavett, & Hunsaker, 2011, p. 127). The authors
have explored increasing the effectiveness of teams through the establishment of team charters
(Hunsaker et al., 2011, p. 127).
Content Summary
The purpose of the article is to promote the use of team charters (Hunsaker et al., 2011, p.
127). To demonstrate the effectiveness of team charters, a description of the basic elements of a
team charter are presented. Along with the description, guidelines are set forth to help instructors
and students in developing and incorporating the team charters within their respective teams.
Some of the key topics covered included an explanation of a team charter and why it is
important (Hunsaker et a., 2011, p. 128), the various elements of a team charter (pp. 129-131),
and the assignment instructions and procedures (pp. 132-135). Other important issues covered
included the concepts of free riders and social loafing (Daft, 2017, p. 603; Hunsaker et al., 2011,
p. 134). Finally, the concepts of Crunch and Pinch Points were discussed and options to
overcome each issue were presented (Hunsaker et al., 2011, pp. 133-134).
Article Credibility: Findings
Reliability.
According to Hunsaker et al. (2011), the team charter concept was implemented three
years ago from the date of this article. The authors presented findings based on “student
feedback, course evaluations, and a survey of the most recent classes” (Hunsaker et al., 2011, p.
135). The authors studied surveys sent to 93 students in three business management classes
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
4
Hunsaker et al., 2011, p. 135). Given the repeated application of the team charter, the findings
would most likely be similar when repeated.
Objectivity.
The findings can be objectively confirmed and verified due to three similar titles of
articles. For instance, in the reference list the article, “The Team Charter Assignment: Improving
the Effectiveness of Classroom Teams” (Cox & Bobrowski, 2004) was published in a highly
respected peer-reviewed journal, The Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. Thus, an
outside highly respected source supported the findings within this study. Other similar titles
included, “The Team Role Test: Development and Validation of a Team Role Knowledge
Situational Judgment Test” (Mumford, Van Iddekinge, Morgeson, & Campion, 2008) and the
article by Edmonston, Roberto, and Watkins (2003), “A Dynamic Model of Top Management
Team Effectiveness: Managing Unstructured Task Teams” in Leadership Quarterly.
Validity.
In answering the validity of the findings, the question is whether the findings might apply
to other industries. The answer is absolutely yes and principally based on the proliferation of
virtual teams both in the academic context (environment) and in business (contexts)
environments worldwide! According to Hunsaker et al. (2011), several studies were completed
“to enhance team performance, evaluation, and leadership in the workplace” (p. 127). Further,
six studies were identified that related to psychological contracts and team charters throughout
the study and within the reference list.
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
5
Sources.
There are a variety of peer-reviewed article and book sources within the Reference List.
Many highly respected sources include the following names of academic journals, Journal of
Management Education, Journal of Applied Psychology, The Journal of Behavioral and Applied
Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior, and Administrative Science Quarterly. The
findings were related to and supported by several peer-reviewed journal articles and other similar
researched materials.
Application
This Professor is a Town Judge and a past Director for the New York State Magistrates
Association (NYSMA) with over 1,872 member Judges across the state of New York. There
were several statewide committees formed at the September 2017 Conference. Time is a major
constraint and with new members, there have been miscommunications at times concerning the
delegation of specific duties and responsibilities to be completed in the upcoming year.
According to Daft (2017), a free rider “is a person who benefits from team membership
but does not make a proportionate contribution to the team’s work” (p. 603). Although
infrequent, there are a very few Judges who are well intentioned but for whatever reason, they
are not able to complete their work during the year. However, they accept the accolades when the
team is recognized for their overall efforts.
The team charter might alleviate the free rider issue and spell out the specific duties and
consequences for not fulfilling those duties. Hunsaker et al. (2011) strongly suggest measuring
and rewarding individual contributions (p. 134). Further, the four steps outlined on pages 133
and 134 are ones that this Judge will be enacting in the next two weeks to ensure everyone is
aware of their responsibilities and that they understand the critical nature of communicating both
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
6
minor disruptions and unbearable disruptions in successfully completing team assignments
(Hunsaker et al., 2011, p. 133). By adhering to the highlighted elements of a team charter as
presented by Hunsaker et al. (2011), this Judge feels the NYSMA team assignments will be more
effective and completed in a timelier manner.
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
7
References
Daft, R. L. (2017). Management (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
DeRosa, D. M., & Lepsinger, R. (2010). Virtual team success: A practical guide for working and
leading from a distance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hunsaker, J. (n.d.). Johanna Hunsaker. University of San Diego: School of Business
Administration. Retrieved from
http://www.sandiego.edu/business/directory/biography.php?_focus=165
Hunsaker, P. (n.d.). Phil Hunsaker. University of San Diego: School of Business Administration.
Retrieved from http://www.sandiego.edu/business/directory/biography.php?_focus=171
Hunsaker, P., Pavett, C., & Hunsaker, J. (2011). Increasing student-learning team effectiveness
with team charters. Journal of Education for Business, 86(3), 127-139.
doi:10.1080/08832323.2010.489588
Pavett, C. (n.d.). Cynthia Pavett. University of San Diego: School of Business Administration.
Retrieved from http://www.sandiego.edu/business/directory/biography.php?_focus=331
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
8
GM501 Grading Rubric
Annotated Bibliography # 1
Areas to be evaluated
Academic Article
-Peer reviewed Journal article
Annotation Format
-Properly cited the article in
APA 6th
Author Credibility
-What are the author’s
credentials and experience?
-How would you assess their
credibility….why?
Intended Audience
-Who is the author addressing?
Content Summary
-Summarize the content of the
article.
Article Credibility: Findings
Points
Earned
Possible
Points
4
2
3
3
8
Reliability: Are the findings
reliable? How likely is it that
the findings would be same if
repeated?
Objectivity: Can the findings
be objectively
confirmed/verified?
Validity: Are the findings
relevant for other
contexts? Are the findings
transferable?
Sources: Are the findings
based on (linked to) previously
published research in peer
reviewed journal articles?
8
Application
-How would you apply the
central message from this
article to your professional or
personal life?
4
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
-Paper Length: Minimum length
requirement is 2 full pages, that is
600 words
Writing:
-Spelling, Grammar, Paragraph
Construction, Organization
9
2
6
Late Penalty
Total Points Earned
40
Running head: UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
Unit One Assignment – Annotated Bibliography
Learner Name
Purdue Global University
GM501-01: Management Theories and Practices II
Dr. Carrie A. O’Hare
March 18, 2019
1
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
Unit One Assignment – Annotated Bibliography
Academic Article/Annotation Format
Author Credibility
Intended Audience
Content Summary
Article Credibility: Findings
Reliability.
Objectivity.
Validity.
Sources.
Application
2
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
3
References
Daft, R. L. (2017). Management (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
DeRosa, D. M., & Lepsinger, R. (2010). Virtual team success: A practical guide for working and
leading from a distance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
4
GM501 Grading Rubric
Annotated Bibliography # 1
Areas to be evaluated
Academic Article
-Peer reviewed Journal article
Annotation Format
-Properly cited the article in
APA 6th
Author Credibility
-What are the author’s
credentials and experience?
-How would you assess their
credibility….why?
Intended Audience
-Who is the author addressing?
Content Summary
-Summarize the content of the
article.
Article Credibility: Findings
Points
Earned
Possible
Points
4
2
3
3
8
Reliability: Are the findings
reliable? How likely is it that
the findings would be same if
repeated?
Objectivity: Can the findings
be objectively
confirmed/verified?
Validity: Are the findings
relevant for other
contexts? Are the findings
transferable?
Sources: Are the findings
based on (linked to) previously
published research in
academic journals?
8
Application
-How would you apply the
central message from this
article to your professional or
personal life?
4
UNIT ONE ASSIGNMENT
-Paper Length: Minimum length
requirement is 2 full pages, that is
600 words
Writing:
-Spelling, Grammar, Paragraph
Construction, Organization
5
2
6
Late Penalty
Total Points Earned
40

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
GM501 PUGlobal Unit 1 Gender Discrimination Management And Leadership ALL WORK MUST BE ORIGINAL AND NO PLAGIARISM. WORK MUST BE 3 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE AND
For $10/Page 0nly
Order Essay
admin

Recent Posts

Economic Debate #3- Progressive Income Tax – The Homework Helper

Economic Debate- Progressive Income Tax For this Economic Debate, we are going to discuss the…

2 years ago

MKT 6120 – Marketing Management – Davis Learning Engagement #7

TOPIC: Going Global Discussion Thread 1 (initial post due Wednesday for full credit) Please note:…

4 years ago

jvjvjhvjhvhjvj

Assignment Topic This week will culminate in the creation of a narrated PowerPoint to create…

4 years ago

Students are supposed to select a technological organization of their choice.

The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted…

4 years ago

Increases the risk of wildfires

you need to post your 2-page information flier to share with your Final Project Group.…

4 years ago

Statistics for Technology management

discussion: Discuss the methods used at your company to measure and ensure quality products and…

4 years ago