Glendale Community College Siegel vs Tom case Analysis Tom, Stacey’s sole survivor and her very mature and intelligent 17 year old son, who graduated from

Glendale Community College Siegel vs Tom case Analysis Tom, Stacey’s sole survivor and her very mature and intelligent 17 year old son, who graduated from high school early and is a Senior in College, where he has completed his business law class, wants to continue live in the new home under construction, but wants to turn the property into a horse breeding ranch and build a 16 unit stable. He contacts Siegel who learns that Tom is about to graduate from college. As Siegel prepares the contract for Tom, he asks, “You are old enough to do this right?” Tom agrees he is a senior in college and signs an additional contract for the completion of a 16 unit stable for $65,000, due upon completion. A year later the Stable Project is completed, and Siegel asks for his final payment of $65,000. Tom never replies, and finally file suit for recovery of his $65,000.Do not discuss contract questions of Agreement – offer and acceptance, or Consideration. What we must consider in this case is Tom’s capacity to enter a legal contract as he is a minor.Using F-IRAC consider the Contract Formation questions for this contract between Tom & Siegel.Analysis with Fact summary & Conclusion