ERAU Management of Information Systems Disasters & Incident Response Plan Contingency plan, disaster response plan, and disaster recovery plan are overlap

ERAU Management of Information Systems Disasters & Incident Response Plan Contingency plan, disaster response plan, and disaster recovery plan

are overlapping plans contained in the business continuity plan. An

incident response plan provides a framework to map out procedures and

instructions an organization must follow when faced with a disaster.

Using the format provided in the text as well as additional resources

provided in the readings section, design an incident response plan for a

small business. Include actions to be taken if each of the following

events occur:

Virus attack
Power failure
Fire
Burst water pipe
ISP failure

What other scenarios do you think are important and need a plan?

MGMT 394 7.3 Hands-On Rubric

MGMT 394 7.3 Hands-On Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content and Development

30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.

26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated

23.0 pts (Average – C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.

20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.

17.0 pts (Failing – F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization and Structure

30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.

26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.

23.0 pts (Average – C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.

20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.

17.0 pts (Failing – F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis

25.0 pts (Excellent – A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.

22.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.

19.0 pts (Average – C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.

17.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.

14.0 pts (Failing – F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format

15.0 pts (Excellent – A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.

13.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.

11.0 pts (Average – C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.

9.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.

7.0 pts (Failing – F) Activity is not formatted at all.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0