Discuss the role of analyzing issues in deliberation

Please see all the attachments with this order, the assignment has to be one page only as instructed. Please don’t hesitate to contact me for further information, beside the listed bellow:

In your reading this week, Carcasson discusses the role of analyzing issues in deliberation. You will write a 4-paragraph post, using the following format:

In the first paragraph, first, in one sentence, identify the main problem articulated in this week’s issue guide. Then, explain the three options the issue guide lays out as possible approaches for addressing the problem. Finally, in this paragraph, explain why this issue is relevant or matters to you. If it doesn’t, explain that and offer a consideration about why that is the case.
In the second paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the first approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).
In the third paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the second approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).
In the fourth paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the third approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).
Finally, Carcasson, in your reading, explains “deliberative issue analysis involves researching issues, positions, and community voices in order to determine the:
Obstacles to deliberative engagement (What is making it difficult for relevant audience to engage each other and the issue productively? What do we need to know before we bring people together to engage this topic?)
-Example obstacles: power imbalances between participants, motivation, knowledge/skill,manipulation of public opinion, group polarization, lack of spaces for deliberative discussion
Deliberative tensions. What are the values or issues in this problem that are in tension with each other?
Collaborative resources. What resources are available on this issue for collaborative action?
Choose one or more of the considerations he discusses, explain it using quotes and citations from your reading, and then explain how the issue guide we are deliberating this week does or does not address this consideration in its design.