CRJ201 Ashford Criminal Justice Issue of Law Enforcement Communication Paper Prior to beginning work on this Annotated Bibliography, review the instruction

CRJ201 Ashford Criminal Justice Issue of Law Enforcement Communication Paper Prior to beginning work on this Annotated Bibliography, review the instructions for the Final Paper located in Week 5. Review the Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table; read the article Integrating Evidence-Based Practices Into Judicial Sentencing in the Wake of Realignment’s Split Sentencing; and review the About Federal Courts (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website to help find supplementary resources for the week.

The purpose of creating an Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. is to provide a list of sources to assist you in your approach to the Final Project. The Ashford University Writing Center has created this Annotated Bibliography Template for use in this assignment. The listed sources should be scholarly and/or credible, and at least three of them need to meet scholarly source criteria and come from the JSTOR, Project MUSE, ProQuest, or EBSCOhost databases, which are all available through the Ashford University Library. The list should include the following information for each source:

Name of the source including the complete bibliographic citation in proper APA format
Summary of the source (at least one paragraph) including how this source will contribute to your paper

The Annotated Bibliography must include at least five relevant sources other than the textbook, three of which may be found in the Ashford University Library. Three of the required sources must be scholarly and the remaining two sources must be either scholarly or credible.

Consider using Q for your library research and to access writing supports, and tutoring services available to you. See the Guide to Installing and Using Q (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for more information.

*Note: To access the Ashford University Library directly, click on the Writing Center and Library links in your left navigation. Watch the Database Search Tips (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video for more and see Searching the Ashford University Library document for assignment-specific search tips.

The Annotated Bibliography. For the annotated bibliography, you need to research sources that correspond to the three hypothetical cases included in the Final Project. Please visit the Academic Research section on your course home page (accessible through the Student Responsibilities and Policies tab on the left navigation toolbar) to review what types of materials are not acceptable for academic, university-level research. Because the Final Project includes three hypothetical cases, please find and organize your resources accordingly first by creating the Annotated Bibliography above, and then using the same APA citations in your APA references page that you will place at the end of your Final Paper in Week 5. To assist you with creating the Annotated Bibliography that will be relevant to the Final Paper, please follow these research parameters:

Two Sources for Case No. 1

Case No. 1 includes the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in multilingual settings. In addition, this case considers applications for criminology. Note that Week 1 includes resources that address life course theory and other criminological theories that consider how criminology could address issues in criminal justice. Accordingly, please include the following:
Summarize one source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in multilingual communities.
Summarize one source that provides insight on how criminology may apply to a program, practice, approach or policy relevant to a criminal justice issue in Case No. 1.

One Source for Case No. 2

Case No. 2 addresses juror exclusion by race. Note that the recommended resources for this week include two sources that address this issue. Please include the following:
Summarize one source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal case.

One Source for Case No. 3

Case No. 3 considers Eighth Amendment issues in correctional environments with respect to cell conditions. Please include the following:
Summarize one source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell conditions within the context of Eighth Amendment considerations.

An Additional Source

Please summarize one additional source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to an issue in one of the three cases. This will help you complete a part of the Final Paper that relates to critical perspectives.

The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Cite your sources within the text of your outline and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, including samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, located within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, in your online course.

*Note: You are encouraged to integrate any feedback from your instructor and upload the assignment to your ePortfolio.

The Annotated Bibliography for the Final Paper assignment

Must include the complete bibliographic citation in proper APA format for each source, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and include a summary of each source (at least one paragraph), including how this source will contribute to your paper.
Must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of Assignment
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. resource for additional guidance.
Must include at least five relevant sources other than the textbook, three of which may be found in the Ashford University Library. Three of the required sources must be scholarly and the remaining two sources must be either scholarly or credible.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment. Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Week 3: Annotated Bibliography for Final Project
Your Name
CRJ 201: Introduction to Criminal Justice
Instructor’s Name
Month Day, Year
Want to view a sample annotated
bibliography? Need further help?
Ctrl+Click: Annotated Bibliography
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
Week 3: Annotated Bibliography for Final Project
Author, A. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. doi:# or
Retrieved from journal’s homepage URL
In the first paragraph of your annotation, summarize the main points of the source that
you found to support the ideas in Case #1. This source should address the criminal justice
issue of law enforcement communication in multilingual communities.
In the second paragraph of your annotation, explain how the source is relevant to your
Final Project. Explain how this particular source relates to the ideas discussed in Case #1.
Explain how this source will help you develop your Final Project.
Author, A. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. doi:# or
Retrieved from journal’s homepage URL
In the first paragraph of your annotation, summarize the main points of the source that
provides insight into how criminology may apply to a program, practice, approach, or
policy relevant to a criminal justice issue in Case #1.
In the second paragraph of your annotation, explain how the source is relevant to your
Final Project. Explain how this particular source relates to criminology and a program,
practice, approach, or policy discussed in Case #1. Explain how this source will help you
develop your Final Project.
Author, A. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. doi:# or
Retrieved from journal’s homepage URL
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
3
In the first paragraph of your annotation, summarize the main points of the source that
you found to support the ideas in Case #2. This source should be relevant to the criminal
justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal case.
In the second paragraph of your annotation, explain how the source is relevant to your
Final Project. Explain how this particular source relates to the ideas discussed in Case #2.
Explain how this source will help you develop your Final Project.
Author, A. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. doi:# or
Retrieved from journal’s homepage URL
In the first paragraph of your annotation, summarize the main points of the source that
you found to support the ideas in Case #3. This source should address the criminal justice
issue of cell conditions within the context of Eighth Amendment considerations.
In the second paragraph of your annotation, explain how the source is relevant to your
Final Project. Explain how this particular source relates to the ideas discussed in Case #3.
Explain how this source will help you develop your Final Project.
Author, A. (Year Published). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. doi:# or
Retrieved from journal’s homepage URL
In the first paragraph of your annotation, summarize the main points of the source that
you found to support the ideas in this section of your paper. This source will address the
critical perspective of the criminal justice issue that you chose, relevant to any of the
three cases.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
4
In the second paragraph of your annotation, explain how the source is relevant to your
Final Project. Explain how this particular source relates to a critical perspective of a
criminal justice issue relevant to any of the three cases. Explain how this source will help
you develop your Final Project.
Tip 1: Note that references are listed in alphabetical order.
Tip 2: When including a URL for an online journal, you must search for the journal’s
home page and include this in your reference entry. You may not include the URL
found through your university library, as readers will not have access to this library.
Tip 3: Delete these “hints” (purple boxes) before turning in your final assignment.
Need more help formatting
other types of sources?
Ctrl+Click: Formatting Your
References
CRJ201.W3A1.07.2018
Description:
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Case 1: Summarizes a Source Relevant to the Criminal Justice Issue of Law
Enforcement Communication in Multilingual Settings, and Indicates How the
Source Will Contribute to the Final Project
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law
enforcement communication in multilingual settings, and fully indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project.
Proficient – Summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in multilingual settings,
and indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in multilingual
settings, and somewhat indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or
inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in
multilingual settings and indicate how the source will contribute to the Final Project; however, significant details are missing,
unclear, and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The summary of a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of law enforcement communication in
multilingual settings and indication of how the source will contribute to the Final Project are either nonexistent or lack the
components described in the assignment instructions.
Case 1: Summarizes a Source that Addresses How Criminology Could Support
a Program or Approach in Criminal Justice Relevant to Case 1, and Indicates
How the Source Will Contribute to the Final Project
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes a source that addresses how criminology could support a
program or approach in criminal justice relevant to Case 1, and fully indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project.
Proficient – Summarizes a source that addresses how criminology could support a program or approach in criminal justice
relevant to Case 1, and indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or
inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally summarizes a source that addresses how criminology could support a program or approach in criminal justice
relevant to Case 1, and somewhat indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Relevant details are missing,
unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize a source that addresses how criminology could support a program or approach in
criminal justice relevant to Case 1 and indicate how the source will contribute to the Final Project; however, significant details are
missing, unclear, and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The summary of a source that addresses how criminology could support a program or approach in criminal
justice relevant to Case 1 and indication of how the source will contribute to the Final Project are either nonexistent or lack the
components described in the assignment instructions.
Case 2: Summarizes a Source Relevant to the Criminal Justice Issue of Juror
Exclusion by Race in a Criminal Case, and Indicates How the Source Will
Contribute to the Final Project
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror
exclusion by race in a criminal case, and fully indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project.
Proficient – Summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal case, and indicates
how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal case, and
somewhat indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal
case and indicate how the source will contribute to the Final Project; however, significant details are missing, unclear, or
inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The summary of a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of juror exclusion by race in a criminal case
and indication of how the source will contribute to the Final Project are either nonexistent or lack the components described in
the assignment instructions.
Case 3: Summarizes a Source Relevant to the Criminal Justice Issue of Cell
Conditions and the Eighth Amendment, and Indicates How the Source Will
Contribute to the Final Project
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell
conditions and the Eighth Amendment, and fully indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project.
Proficient – Summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell conditions and the Eighth Amendment, and
indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally summarizes a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell conditions and the Eighth Amendment, and
somewhat indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell conditions and the Eighth
Amendment and indicate how the source will contribute to the Final Project; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and
inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The summary of a source relevant to the criminal justice issue of cell conditions and the Eighth Amendment
and indication of how the source will contribute to the Final Project are either nonexistent or lack the components described in
the assignment instructions.
Additional Source: Summarizes a Source that Addresses a Criminal Justice
Issue Relevant to an Issue in One of the Three Cases, and Indicates How the
Source Will Contribute to the Final Project
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes a source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to
an issue in one of the three cases, and fully indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project.
Proficient – Summarizes a source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to an issue in one of the three cases, and
indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally summarizes a source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to an issue in one of the three cases, and
somewhat indicates how the source will contribute to the Final Project. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize a source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to an issue in one of the
three cases and indicate how the source will contribute to the Final Project; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and
inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The summary of a source that addresses a criminal justice issue relevant to an issue in one of the three
cases and indication of how the source will contribute to the Final Project are either nonexistent or lack the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.
Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few
errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA
requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to
distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted
pages.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All
sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and
cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on
the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted
correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Powered by
?
Week 3 Instructor Guidance
Sean Grier
All Sections
CRJ 201: Introduction to Criminal Justice
Week 3 Assignments:
ReadChapters 6 & 7 in Introduction to Criminal Justice
This week your reading will focus on the courts in particular, which is one component of the criminal
justice system. Much like the criminal justice system as a whole, the components within it also have
various sub-systems. This is the case with the courts. You will be expected to use this information and
your own perspective in this week’s Written Assignment and Discussions.
This week you will need to participate one discussion forum. Create an initial post by Day 3 that
demonstrates a thorough understanding of the material. Respond to at leasttwo peers by Day 7 of the
week. Be sure to fully address the prompt in order to earn full points!
Discussion
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please complete the assigned readings in Chapter 6 and
Chapter 7 of the Wright (2012) text, and review the website, About Federal Courts (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. (http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts) . Be sure to
support your descriptions with references to Wright’s text and/or scholarly sources
The judiciary is an important part of the criminal justice system. After police arrest an individual, an
extensive chain of events is set off in the American court system. As noted, Section 6.2 of Chapter 6 of
the Wright (2012) text indicates that there are 51 separate court systems in the United States. The
federal government operates one court system, referred to as the federal court system. Each of the 50
states operates a court system, referred to as state court systems. Both the federal courts and the state
courts have three main levels: trial courts, appeals courts, and supreme courts. Note that Wright (2012)
also includes a discussion of the term jurisdiction in Section 6.2 of Chapter 6.
Your instructor will assign you a section for this discussion. Respond to the prompts within your
assigned group. For the fourth part (in each group) consider how knowledge of cultural sensitivity and
diversity awareness could apply to positively influence a process or responsibility. Based on your
assigned section, address the following:
• Section 1 – Students whose last name begins with the letters A-I: State and Federal Trial
Courts
? Describe processes for preliminary hearings and for the grand jury.
? Describe the main responsibilities of state trial courts and federal trial courts.
? Interpret how at least one constitutional principle relevant to social and criminal justice relates to
one of the above processes or responsibilities.
? Apply knowledge of cultural sensitivity and diversity awareness to at least one of the above
processes or responsibilities.
• Section 2 – Students whose last names begin with the letters J–Q: State and Federal Appeals
Courts
? Describe processes for arraignment and for plea bargaining.
? Describe the main responsibilities of state appeals courts and federal appeals courts.
? Interpret how at least one constitutional principle relevant to social and criminal justice relates to
one of the above processes or responsibilities.
? Apply knowledge of cultural sensitivity and diversity awareness to at least one of the above
processes or responsibilities.
• Section 3 – Students whose last names begin with the letters R –Z: State Supreme Courts and
the United States Supreme Court.
? Describe processes for jury selection and for the jury.
? Describe the main responsibilities of state supreme courts and the United States Supreme Court.
? Interpret how at least one constitutional principle relevant to social and criminal justice relates to
one of the above processes or responsibilities.
? Apply knowledge of cultural sensitivity and diversity awareness to at least one of the above
processes or responsibilities.
• All Students
? Briefly define the term jurisdiction as it relates to courts.
Guided Response: Your initial post should be at least 350 words in length. Support your claims with
examples from the required material(s) and scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site. (https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a41044d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers
additional guidance on appropriate source types. Respond to at least two of your peers’ posts by Day 7.
Your peer response posts must be in reply to the initial posts of peers from a section other than your
own. Responses to your peers should be at least 150 words in length. Remember that this is a
discussion. If a peer or your instructor asks you …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment