Concordia University Wisconsin Midtown Family Clinic System Recommendation Report stage 3 Stage 3 Assignment Instructions The first step is to incorporat

Concordia University Wisconsin Midtown Family Clinic System Recommendation Report stage 3

Stage 3 Assignment Instructions

The first step is to incorporate the feedback you received on your Stage 2 assignment, making any needed corrections or adjustments.If you have not incorporated the feedback from your Stage 1 assignment, you should do so prior to submitting Stage 3. Although the incorporation of feedback will not be graded until the final Report is submitted in Stage 4, it will assist you going forward to incorporate feedback at each stage. For this assignment, you will add Section III to Sections I and II of the System Recommendation Report (SRR).

Using the case study, the overview above, Course Content readings, and external resources, develop your Section III on ethical, legal and regulatory policy issues. Approximate lengths for each section are provided as a guideline; be sure to provide all pertinent information.Apply specific information from the case study to address each area listed below.

III.Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Policy Issues

For each topic, you will provide:

a brief definition, a minimum of two sentences, in your own words
a brief explanation, a minimum of two sentences, of the impact of the topic or issue on the selection and use of the EHR system; and
a brief explanation, a minimum of two sentences, of how the topic or issue will be addressed in the development and use of the EHR system.
Addressing the Most Difficult Issue – Consider each of the 20 issues listed and choose the one that you believe will be the most difficult for the Midtown Family Clinic to implement.Explain why you selected the issue and what should be done to ensure it is properly addressed when the system is selected, implemented and used.Your response will be assessed on its applicability to the Case Study and how well you support your choice and explain what should be done.(A paragraph of five to six sentences.)
Summary – briefly summarize the content of this section and tie the information together for the reader.(3-4 sentences)

DO NOT copy the definitions from the class resources or other sources, but use your own words and provide enough information to demonstrate your understanding of each topic.

The “right” and “wrong” answers have to do with whether or not you correctly define each issue as it relates to an EHR technology solution and provide a well-supported explanation for how it will be accommodated.Your responses will be evaluated on whether they are applicable to an EHR solution, appropriately defined, adequately explained, and are appropriate to the Midtown Family Clinic.

Table of Ethical, Legal and Regulatory Policy Issues

Topic

Definition of the Topic

(minimum 2 sentences for each, a definition in your own words)

How the topic impacts and will be addressed in the selection and use of an EHR system (minimum 4 sentences for each topic – 2 on impact and 2 on how addressed)

1

Safe Design

2

Meaningful Use

3

Quality Improvement

4

Data Accuracy

5

Data Accessibility

6

Data Comprehensiveness

7

Data Consistency

8

Privacy

9

Confidentiality

10

Security

11

Individually Identifiable Health Information

12

Protected Health Information

13

HIPAA Privacy Rule

14

HIPAA Security Rule

15

Business Associate Contracts

16

Authentication

17

Authorization

18

Encryption

19

Technical Safeguards

20

Healthcare Ethical Principles

Formatting Your Assignment

For academic writing, the writer is expected to write in the third person. In third person, the writer avoids the pronouns I, we, my, you, your, and ours. The third person is used to make the writing more objective by taking the individual, the “self,” out of the writing. This method is very helpful for academic writing, a form in which facts, not opinion, drive the tone of the text. Writing in the third person allows the writer to come across as unbiased and thus more informed.The Report is to be written for the Midtown Family Clinic, and reference should not be made by name to individuals who own or work in the Clinic.

Include Sections I and II revised according to any feedback received, and add to it Section III.
Keep your paper concise:Use the recommendations provided in each area for length of response.Content areas should be double spaced; table entries should be single-spaced. It’s important to value quality over quantity.Section III should not exceed 4 pages.
Ensure that the table is preceded by an introductory sentence that explains what is contained in the table, so the reader understands why the table has been included.
Use at least two resources with APA formatted citation and reference.Use at least one external reference and one from the course content.
Submit your paper as a Word document, or a document that can be read in Word.
Your submission filename should be as follows:Lastname_firstname_Stage_3
Compare your work to the Assignment Instructions above and the Evaluation Criteria/Grading Rubric below to be sure you have met content and quality criteria.Do not overlook this step.Read your work out loud or have your computer read it to you.Fix the grammar and other areas identified.

EVALUATION CRITERIA/GRADING RUBRIC:

Criteria

90-100%

Far Above Standards

80-89%

Above Standards

70-79%

Meets Standards

60-69%

Below Standards