BBA475 Columbia Southern Nuclear Power & Sustainable Energy Source Discussion Is creating energy and electricity through nuclear power plants, a sustainabl

BBA475 Columbia Southern Nuclear Power & Sustainable Energy Source Discussion Is creating energy and electricity through nuclear power plants, a sustainable energy source, in order to augment reliance on fossil fuels an ethical idea when compared to other technologies, such as solar, wind, and natural gas? If so, on what basis? If not, why, and is there anything that could bolster its ethical production?

Please keep the response short this is not an essay.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Please respond to my classmate response below

Yes our country has a dependency for fossil fuels and nuclear power plants. These plants provide power for millions of people, coal is still used for energy and heat. Not saying these are the best things in the world to use, but they work and get the job done and create jobs at the same time. Yes wind mills, solar engergy and natural gas are all better choices in the long run and have less residual effects on our planet. But lets look at the big picture, our country is already set up to run on these plants that running and providing the majority of all the power in this country. Getting this country switced over to safer and healither energy choices is going to take time and lots of time, money, man power. We have to get all of these things built, put in place hooked up and operational then connected to deliever to the people. Until there is enough of these other energy options out there and in place to take care of every and even make the thought of not using nuclear power a reality it will take time. Another 15 years this might be a more ethical option to provide power for our country, but not today. For now we dance with the devil we know until renewable energy is more avalible for the people. UNIT V STUDY GUIDE
Ethical Actions in Times of Business
Issues Surrounding Certain Tragic Events
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
2. Relate ethical behavior in high-profile events.
3. Examine regulatory and sustainability market approaches to business’s environmental
responsibilities.
Reading Assignment
In order to access the following resource(s), click the link(s) below:
Matejek, S., & Gossling, T. (2014). Beyond legitimacy: A case study in BP’s “green lashing.” Journal of
Business Ethics, 120(4), 571-584. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.c
olumbiasouthern.edu/docview/1513729827?accountid=33337
Roberts, P. S. (2006). FEMA after Katrina. Policy Review, (137), 15-33. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=bth&AN=21254699&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Chapter five: Lessons learned. (2005, September 15). In The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons
learned. Retrieved from http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/reports/katrina-lessonslearned/chapter5.html
Peters, J. W. (2010, June 10). Efforts in Gulf of Mexico to limit flow of news about the spill. The New
York Times. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?auth=CAS&url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.
do?p=ITOF&sw=w&u=oran95108&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CA228471542&it=r&asid=c9f34b728871e
cc3f98708adb413b757
Unit Lesson
Click here to access an introduction
video.
Click here to access the introduction video transcript.
BBA 4751, Business Ethics
1
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
Click here to access a video that briefly
introduces topics in this unit.
Click here to access the video transcript.
Henry Potter is a slum lord banker in the famous seasonal movie It’s a Wonderful Life. Potter is the richest
man in town, yet he charges extortionate rents. The greedy banker is motivated only by increasing his share
of the banking and residential rental business in town at every opportunity. He is a majority shareholder in
hero George Bailey’s Bailey Building & Loan and tries to take advantage of the residents when there is a bank
run on Bailey’s Loan by offering the shareholders $0.50 on the dollar for their outstanding shares. Potter is
unscrupulous, and at one point, he mistakenly receives $8,000 from Bailey’s uncle who had wrapped it in a
newspaper, which he later threw at Potter in anger. Potter steals the money, and when Bailey realizes it is
missing, he (on behalf of his uncle) must get a loan to cover the missing money. He ironically goes to Potter,
who unethically grants him a loan on the money Potter actually stole. Potter later threatens to use the force of
law to imprison Bailey on a technicality of nonpayment of the loan. Potter seemingly adheres to all of the
technical legal banking requirements, while taking advantage (or trying to) of the residents in Bedford Falls
without regard to the ethical nature of his decisions; he is self-interested, greedy, uncaring, dishonest,
disloyal, and unscrupulous.
Like Potter, some companies operate (technically) legally, yet they are unethical. Companies perform their
obligations to the minimum standard required when much more is required in the situation. To paraphrase
former U.S. Chief Justice Stewart, it can be said that ethics are about knowing the difference between what
your rights are and what the right thing to do is (Collins, 2014). This will be the central inquiry of this unit. In
one company we will study, they are alleged to have taken actions that supposedly discharge their ethical and
legal obligations solely for the purpose of enhancing their reputation. If you act ethically but for the wrong
reasons, is it still ethical? On the other hand, some organizations say they are “doing the best they can” in a
given circumstance, yet their incompetence causes them to behave unethically, though no harm was
intended. In this unit, we will delve into three case studies through the lens of ethical philosophy and decisionmaking by leaders. We will study the BP Oil Spill, the recent Japanese nuclear reactor meltdown, and the
Hurricane Katrina disaster, respectively.
In the British Petroleum (BP) Oil Spill, on April 20, 2010, a wellhead on the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling
platform exploded in the Gulf of Mexico near the Louisiana coastline. It was the largest offshore oil spill in
U.S. history. The extent of the actual oil spill is currently unknown partly because BP prevented the requests
of independent scientists to measure the spill on the ocean floor given that BP stated the flow rate of the oil
was irrelevant to the response effort and might even hinder it. How would knowing the flow rate actually
hinder the response efforts to mitigate the damage? Would authorities not need to know how big the disaster
was in order to effectively clean it up? Media was largely excluded from the site by President Obama and BP;
therefore, relevant and accurate information was not disseminated.
BP was obligated to clean-up the spill, but U.S. legal protections for wildlife in the Gulf are nearly nonexistent.
Do we have ethical responsibilities to the wildlife that surrounds us? There was no penalty to BP for killing
thousands of animals and negatively affecting the food chain in far-reaching areas. Technically, BP
remediated the damage to the environment, but should it have done more given the extreme harm it caused
though no legal violation occurred? Were its actions ethical to those nearby residents and the wildlife at
large?
Furthermore, many argue there was a deep divide between BP’s actual operations and what it was
communicating to the public and market about its corporate responsibility in the Gulf. In the aftermath of the
spill, BP spent large amounts of money in rebranding itself as a “green” company, though its “green” efforts
were lackluster and may have only represented minimum efforts on behalf of wildlife. In this unit, we will look
closely at BP’s responsive actions substantively, as well as its “greenwashing” after the fact and address its
legal and ethical obligations, on what basis they rested, and whether they were discharged.
BBA 4751, Business Ethics
2
In the context of the nuclear power plant meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi, the emergency
was GUIDE
set into motion
UNIT x STUDY
when an earthquake and resulting tsunami hit the surrounding area. The meltdown
Title at Daiichi was as large as
the 1986 Chernobyl disaster that released 100,000 tons of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean and a
radioactive plume all over the world. In the context of producing nuclear energy as a sustainable alternative
source to fossil fuels, we will focus on the theory of utilitarianism and whether this paradigm is applied,
whether the nuclear energy program maximizes well-being to most people, and whether there are alternatives
to accomplish the same end. We will focus on the impact of local residents and their ethical treatment,
regulations, and violations, as well as whether key information was disseminated. In the analysis, we will
evaluate other sources of energy, both their benefits and costs, and compare them to nuclear energy
production. Some argue nuclear energy is “green” because it obviates the need to use fossil fuels, does not
emit pollutants, and is generally safe. Others counter that it produces radioactive byproducts that contaminate
the environment upon disposal for thousands of years. How does one decide which types of energy are
ethically produced and on what basis? Might it be the process or the end result, or is it what it prevents?
Last, we will look at the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) emergency response to
Hurricane Katrina’s landfall in the New Orleans area in 2006. In this context, we will look at whether
incompetency or inefficiency can be and was the cause of FEMA’s disastrous response to the situation and
decide whether incompetency rather than intent can form the basis of unethical action based on the concepts
we have already covered. We will study an organization mired in bureaucracy, significantly under-funded and
divided, under-staffed, primarily responsible for a situation in which it had little ability to access and
communicate information about the unfolding tragedy and allocate its emergency services. Is it enough that
FEMA did “the best with what they had,” or was this tragedy foreseeable, and thus they were obligated to be
better organized, trained, staffed, and funded in order to ethically discharge their duties? In this case, FEMA
did a few things well, but on the whole, its efforts fell short, and there were failures; too little came too late for
the residents.
Whether companies are doing what they have a right to do or are really doing the right thing, in the context of
these disasters, is central to how we view ethical decision-making and leadership on a grander scale. Intent
matters; however, we shall see that the lack of it can also form the basis of unethical action.
Reference
Collins, M. A. (2014). Supreme justice. Seattle, WA: Thomas and Mercer.
BBA 4751, Business Ethics
3

Purchase answer to see full
attachment