Write a synthesis, summary, and analysis of at least 2 of the articles

Description

Advanced essential business concepts – class Learning Objective #1: Learning to use Microsoft Word. Learning Objective #2: Learning to review and analyze scholarly writing. In a 5-7 page APA paper, write a synthesis, summary, and analysis of at least 2 of the articles that you read during Week 1 regarding ethics. Your analysis will use the ideas presented in the articles for this week’s readings. Also, from the Keiser University Online Library, find two scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles that are related to the ideas that you read about this week and last week. Research for these journal articles in the EBSCO or ProQuest databases in our library. See instructions for using the library in the Week 1 library assignment instructions. NOTE: With the exception of required readings, no credit will be awarded for sources from outside of the library. The library sources will be used to justify your stance and back-up your opinions. Cite all sources (textbook, articles, research) in-text citation and at work’s end according to the APA standards in your APA manual. If you have never written a review, use the resources located in your Getting Started > Course Resources folder to guide you in the process. Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Content Name: Rubric for Papers Description: Quality of Content Scoring is based on the main categories: (a)Clarity of Introduction (b) Application of Theory (c) References (d) Critical and Creative Thinking and (e) Quality of Writing Grid View List View Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Clarity of Introduction Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Introduction – Student introduces very little or no topic and tells the reader what to expect. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Introduction – Student introduces very little of the topic and tells the reader what to expect. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Introduction – Student introduces some of the topic and tells the reader what to expect. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Introduction – Student introduces the topic and tells the reader what to expect. Application of Theory Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%) Accuracy – Student applies very little or no theory and/or research to the topic. Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%) Accuracy – Student applies very little theory and/or research to the topic. Points Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%) Accuracy – Student applies some theory and/or some research to the topic. Points Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%) Accuracy – Student accurately applies theory and/or research to the topic. Relevance Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 10.35 (10.35%) Relevance – Student focuses very little or no discussion directly on topic content. Points Range:10.5 (10.50%) – 11.85 (11.85%) Relevance – Student focuses very little discussion directly on topic content. Points Range:12 (12.00%) – 13.35 (13.35%) Relevance – Student focuses some discussion directly on topic content. Points Range:13.5 (13.50%) – 15 (15.00%) Relevance – Student focuses discussion directly on topic content. References-Resources Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Resources – Student uses very little or no peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Resources – Student uses very little or no peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Resources – Student uses some peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Resources – Student uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Reference List Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Reference List – Reference list is poorly constructed or not constructed at all. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Reference List – Reference list is fairly constructed. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Reference List – Reference list is fairly well constructed. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Reference List – Reference list is properly constructed. In-Text Citations and Paraphrasing Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using very little or no format required for scholarly work. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using very little format required for scholarly work. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done fairly well using format required for scholarly work. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using format required for scholarly work. Critical Thinking Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13.8 (13.80%) Critical Thinking – Student applies very little or no higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. Points Range:14 (14.00%) – 15.8 (15.80%) Critical Thinking – Student applies very little higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. Points Range:16 (16.00%) – 17.8 (17.80%) Critical Thinking – Student applies some higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. Points Range:18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%) Critical Thinking – Student applies higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. Creative Thinking Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%) Recommendations demonstrate very little or no original thinking. Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%) Recommendations demonstrate very little original thinking. Points Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%) Recommendations demonstrate some level original thinking. Points Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%) Recommendations demonstrate original thinking. Quality of Writing-APA Formatting Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%) Format – Text does not meet APA/Graduate School standards or meets it to a minimum. Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%) Format – Text meets APA/Graduate School standards to an accepted minimum. Points Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%) Format – Text meets APA/Graduate School standards to acceptable standards. Points Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%) Format – Text meets APA/Graduate School standards. Organization Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Organization – Organization of paper demonstrates very little or no critical thinking. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Organization – Organization of paper demonstrates very little critical thinking. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Organization – Organization of paper demonstrates some critical thinking. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Organization – Organization of paper demonstrates critical thinking. Precision Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Student uses very little terminology and writes clearly and concisely to a minimum or below expectations. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Student uses vey little terminology and writes clearly and concisely to a minimum acceptable standard. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Student uses some terminology and writes somewhat clearly and concisely. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Student uses terminology and writes clearly and concisely. Mechanics Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.45 (3.45%) Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly few times or none. Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.95 (3.95%) Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly few times. Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4.45 (4.45%) Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly most of the time. Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) – 5 (5.00%) Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly. Name:Rubric for Papers Description:Quality of Content Scoring is based on the main categories: (a)Clarity of Introduction (b) Application of Theory (c) References (d) Critical and Creative Thinking and (e) Quality of Writing