Strategy Creation—For-Profit Organization Assignment | Get Paper Help

Option #2: Strategy Creation—For-Profit Organization For this project, you will synthesize and apply the concepts, principles, and theories studied in this course to a practical scenario. The primary purpose for this assignment is for you to convey to your instructor that you understand the strategy-creation process and that you can identify specific examples of strategic-planning activities appropriate for the organization you selected. Write a paper based on the outline you created in Module 4. Base your paper on the following scenario. Scenario You work in strategic planning department of a for-profit organization of your choice. This needs to be an existing non-profit organization currently functioning anywhere in the world. For the past five years, you have served in several roles within the organization. Recently, the organization’s senior leadership team determined that a more effective strategic-planning process is needed. You have gladly stepped into this role to help determine what the improved processes or activities might be. You have been asked by your manager to put together a project to help the executive leadership team better understand the concepts and principles of a well-designed strategy process. In addition, the document is to include a set of sample strategic-planning activities relevant to your organization and industry. For this project, the concepts, examples, and principles are used as a basis for discussion at an upcoming executive leadership team retreat. Portfolio Project Requirements In your paper, present the following topics: The strategy concepts, theories, and principles, which are important for helping the senior executive leadership team understand the strategy-creation process. At least one original table or figure that relates to your selected company. Note that if you insert a table from a published source, it is not considered original. Be creative in the design of your tables or figures. Format in accordance with CSU-Global guidelines. When writing your final paper, be sure to follow these guidelines: 10 to 12 pages in length, organized, and well-written in conformity with the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Support your work with at least ten peer-reviewed articles or scholarly journals in addition to the textbook. The CSU-Global library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references. Include a title page, section headers, introduction, conclusion, and reference page

MGT510 Mod 8 PP

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Strategy Creation—For-Profit Organization Assignment | Get Paper Help
For $10/Page 0nly
Order Essay
MGT510 Mod 8 PP
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
60.0 to >48.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities applied to an organization; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

48.0 to >36.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

36.0 to >24.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
60.0 to >48.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of Porter’s value chain, internal factor analysis, and an organization’s areas of weakness and strength.

48.0 to >36.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

36.0 to >24.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

24.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on organizational strategy and capabilities.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts
Total Points: 215.0

 

Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper