ST Thomas University Advanced Practice Nursing Case Study Presentation The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as

ST Thomas University Advanced Practice Nursing Case Study Presentation The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS:
Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
Address Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice Assignment
Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the selected area of advanced practice
Describe an issue or concern regarding the selected area of advanced practice and explain its impact on health care outcomes.
Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:
The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.
The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems

4.0 pts

Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3.0 pts

Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2.0 pts

Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1.0 pts

Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

4.0 pts

Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3.0 pts

Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2.0 pts

Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1.0 pts

Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4.0 pts

Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3.0 pts

Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2.0 pts

Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1.0 pts

Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4.0 pts

Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3.0 pts

Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2.0 pts

Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1.0 pts

Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes speaker’s notes and the assigned number of slides.

4.0 pts

Full Marks

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2.0 pts

Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1.0 pts

Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4.0 pts