SOCW 6361 WU Wk 8 The Social Policy Analysis Policy Strengths & Weaknesses Essay Project: Part 3: Analysis of a Policy As an astute social worker and profe

SOCW 6361 WU Wk 8 The Social Policy Analysis Policy Strengths & Weaknesses Essay Project: Part 3: Analysis of a Policy As an astute social worker and professional
policy advocate, once you have selected and identified a social problem,
you begin the process of creating and implementing a policy that
addresses that social problem. One of the first things you do in the
implementation process is an analysis of the social policy you
identified.In Part 3 of your ongoing Social Change Project assignment, you analyze the selected social policy.Complete Part 3 of your Social Change Project.Address the following items within a 2-3 page paper:Evaluate the policy’s strengths and weaknesses. What is working? What is not working?How will changing this policy affect clinical social workers or the clients of clinical social workers?Provide an update on the advocacy activities your proposed in the Week 6 Assignment (find attached).REQUIRED READINGSJansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series.
Chapter 10, “Developing and Using Power in the Policy-Enacting Task” (pp. 372-419)

Rocha, C., Poe, B., & Thomas, V. (2010). Political activities of social workers: Addressing perceived barriers to political participation. Social Work, 55(4), 317–325.

Optional Resources Social Policy and Change
Walden University
SOCW 6361
2
Policy strength and weaknesses
In order to implement the policy for mental healthcare, administrative partners across the country
are presented with valuable information through the perspectives for supporting social workers
groups participating in improving service reach to the minorities (Stone & Waldron, 2019).
Some of the weaknesses faced by the Affordable Care Act policy for mental healthcare are that
organizations with social workers have trouble eliminating disparities for cases of potentially
dangerous risks to the safety of mental health patients, and other risk factors (Stone & Waldron,
2019). In reality, it is a new ground to recognize and use patient abilities. Today, the importance
of understanding and emphasizing resilience is evident, as are the concerns of clinical workers and
mental health patients in the area of positive psychology (Jansson, 2018). Nevertheless, we care
little about the attributes and background of mental health patients. Another complicating factor
being that some of the minorities with mental health problems are often deemed stubborn or noncompliant and prohibit a working relationship between them and the clinical workers.
A notable strength for the policy is that it offers measures and indicators of success for the
advancement of mental health, emergency care, and secondary care. This reflects on the
partnerships between mental and physical health challenges and offers ways of addressing them.
At the heart of the program is a primary care and a fulltime access to clinical facilities as
emphasized under the Affordable Care Act. What works is the motive to further enhance effective
interventions on the implementation of the policy bearing in mind that mental healthcare affects a
larger population, which is clients and clinical social workers alike.
3
Effect of policy changes
The policy changes made to mental healthcare has particular implications from a clear plan to
address their specific needs for clinical workers and how they relate to their patients. While some
clinical workers have a strong support network, others may find it challenging to find the least
amount of support. The more complex the support environment of aid agencies with a specific
population, the more innovative these clinical workers can be in their efforts to find a solution that
reacts to the patient’s needs (Jansson, 2018).
Changes in the policy on cultural and linguistic approaches to reduce disparities need to be factored
to the common benefit of the recipients, which are the patients. In order to support such, there is a
need for further deliberations to factor in and understand the issues facing minorities. Such can be
the deficiency in income to get medical covers under the Affordable Care Act policy. Providing
an incentive or lowering coverage premiums as an approach will benefit mental health patients
effectively as they progress to recovery. Clinical workers understand that there is a need for
survival. Their primary motivation is to ensure most of the minorities who do not have a
comfortable environment are not ideal but deal with stress more often. It is important, as clinical
social workers, that such patients stay healthy and consider a sustainable solution for their longterm care (Stone & Waldron, 2019). Additionally, the changes will ensure that misdiagnosed cases
are minimized, leading to minority cases excelling in the world of today with the right
organizational support. One can observe the skills and techniques that can impact a patient’s life,
specifically through the role played by the social worker.
4
Update on advocacy activities proposed
The current population has been focusing on the Affordable Care Act provisions. In order to benefit
from the proposed advocacy activity changes for the policy, social workers must foster the ideal
future of the profession (Stone & Waldron, 2019). Recently, there have been actions towards
promoting meaningful progress to serve both the minorities and majorities under medical
coverage, which is crucial for all clinical facilities that are contributing to the improvement
procedures in their respective work environments.
The role of the clinical worker advocacy, as well as the role of the organization, has been to
eliminate discrimination among minorities proposed. The updates of these approaches have
provided a clear understanding of the clinical workers’ profession and the mental healthcare cases
effectively. When employed in a small, medium clinical environment or at the state level with
experienced professionals, there is the same mechanism and skills needed to advocate effectively.
5
Reference
Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social
justice (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series. 372-419
Stone, L., & Waldron, R. (2019). Great expectations and e-mental health:’The role of literacy in
mediating access to mental healthcare’. Australian Journal of general practice, 48(7), 474.
Social Policy and Change
Walden University
SOCW 6361
2
Policy strength and weaknesses
In order to implement the policy for mental healthcare, administrative partners across the country
are presented with valuable information through the perspectives for supporting social workers
groups participating in improving service reach to the minorities (Stone & Waldron, 2019).
Some of the weaknesses faced by the Affordable Care Act policy for mental healthcare are that
organizations with social workers have trouble eliminating disparities for cases of potentially
dangerous risks to the safety of mental health patients, and other risk factors (Stone & Waldron,
2019). In reality, it is a new ground to recognize and use patient abilities. Today, the importance
of understanding and emphasizing resilience is evident, as are the concerns of clinical workers and
mental health patients in the area of positive psychology (Jansson, 2018). Nevertheless, we care
little about the attributes and background of mental health patients. Another complicating factor
being that some of the minorities with mental health problems are often deemed stubborn or noncompliant and prohibit a working relationship between them and the clinical workers.
A notable strength for the policy is that it offers measures and indicators of success for the
advancement of mental health, emergency care, and secondary care. This reflects on the
partnerships between mental and physical health challenges and offers ways of addressing them.
At the heart of the program is a primary care and a fulltime access to clinical facilities as
emphasized under the Affordable Care Act. What works is the motive to further enhance effective
interventions on the implementation of the policy bearing in mind that mental healthcare affects a
larger population, which is clients and clinical social workers alike.
3
Effect of policy changes
The policy changes made to mental healthcare has particular implications from a clear plan to
address their specific needs for clinical workers and how they relate to their patients. While some
clinical workers have a strong support network, others may find it challenging to find the least
amount of support. The more complex the support environment of aid agencies with a specific
population, the more innovative these clinical workers can be in their efforts to find a solution that
reacts to the patient’s needs (Jansson, 2018).
Changes in the policy on cultural and linguistic approaches to reduce disparities need to be factored
to the common benefit of the recipients, which are the patients. In order to support such, there is a
need for further deliberations to factor in and understand the issues facing minorities. Such can be
the deficiency in income to get medical covers under the Affordable Care Act policy. Providing
an incentive or lowering coverage premiums as an approach will benefit mental health patients
effectively as they progress to recovery. Clinical workers understand that there is a need for
survival. Their primary motivation is to ensure most of the minorities who do not have a
comfortable environment are not ideal but deal with stress more often. It is important, as clinical
social workers, that such patients stay healthy and consider a sustainable solution for their longterm care (Stone & Waldron, 2019). Additionally, the changes will ensure that misdiagnosed cases
are minimized, leading to minority cases excelling in the world of today with the right
organizational support. One can observe the skills and techniques that can impact a patient’s life,
specifically through the role played by the social worker.
4
Update on advocacy activities proposed
The current population has been focusing on the Affordable Care Act provisions. In order to benefit
from the proposed advocacy activity changes for the policy, social workers must foster the ideal
future of the profession (Stone & Waldron, 2019). Recently, there have been actions towards
promoting meaningful progress to serve both the minorities and majorities under medical
coverage, which is crucial for all clinical facilities that are contributing to the improvement
procedures in their respective work environments.
The role of the clinical worker advocacy, as well as the role of the organization, has been to
eliminate discrimination among minorities proposed. The updates of these approaches have
provided a clear understanding of the clinical workers’ profession and the mental healthcare cases
effectively. When employed in a small, medium clinical environment or at the state level with
experienced professionals, there is the same mechanism and skills needed to advocate effectively.
5
Reference
Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social
justice (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series. 372-419
Stone, L., & Waldron, R. (2019). Great expectations and e-mental health:’The role of literacy in
mediating access to mental healthcare’. Australian Journal of general practice, 48(7), 474.
Part II project
Walden University
SOCW 6361
July 2020
Description of week three social problem and policy
2
The social problem explored in week three is mental health. The write-up noted that
mental health issues continue increasing despite the comprehensive frameworks put in place to
address them. Even though mental health issues affect all countries globally, individuals in rural
areas and those that live in developing countries are the most affected. The number of mental
health experts that are supposed to handle mental health disorders is fewer, making it challenging
for affected people to access appropriate care. In most cases, individuals that are in dire need of
mental health care end up unattended. The paper suggested that governmental and nongovernmental agencies should play an active role in lowering risks caused by mental health
disorders by funding the training professionals in the social health sector. The social policy
covered in week three is the Black Community Month program known as Mental Health
Awareness. It was a tool utilized by the State of Pennsylvania to pursue various approaches to
decrease mental health disparity among African-American communities. Several legislations that
were implemented focused on that State’s policies that were linked to low-income earning
households, which received minimal healthcare that resulted in the higher disparity rates.
Description of desired social change
The desirable social change that this paper seeks to explore is the social problem of
injustices and discrimination experienced by individuals with disabilities. Globally, more than
one million people live with disabilities. According to Flynn (2015), there is likelihood for
individuals to experience either temporary or permanent disability at least once in a lifetime.
Despite advancements associated with modern civilization, people with disabilities are exposed
to varying levels of social and economic inequalities, denied autonomy, and subjected to dignity
violations. Even though people with disabilities in different parts of the world go through
varying forms of injustices based on cultures and traditions, the biases occur in all nations,
3
including developed, developing, and under-developed countries. Ward and Meyer (1999) argue
that human beings are likely to experience physical, sensory, or mental impairment, which does
not necessarily lead to disability unless the impairment limits their engagement in productive
community life. People with disabilities have the same zeal and celebrate life as other
individuals. They are always willing to participate in different aspects of life; however, they get
mocked from time to time.
The specific action plan to effect change
The action plan is structured to create awareness of human rights that people with
disabilities are entitled to as provided in international law. According to Jansson (2018), all
people need to be aware of their rights and freedoms. The Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (CRPD) affirms all the international provisions, especially those that focus on
the rights and liberties of individuals with disabilities. It is critical for people with disabilities,
coupled with their allies, to explore the dynamics of the sociopolitical environment in which they
operate. They need to examine and navigate the weight of human rights as presented by their
immediate surroundings. Pursuing a sensitization model that will enhance consciousness will be
vital in mobilizing the populace to undertake courses designed to fight against discrimination and
stand for equal space for individuals with disabilities. Social campaigns will form an integral part
of the action plan because of their overall ability to effect change in the long run.
How the efforts will address injustices and discrimination against people with disabilities
The action plan provided herein uses the human rights-based model to address the issue
of disability rights. It captures the negative effects of the limitations experienced by individuals
with disabilities as posed to them by their surrounding physical and social environments due to
4
violations of their fundamental human rights. The approach advanced in this write-up is designed
to transform the needs of people with disabilities into viable rights that can be claimed and
advocated in various platforms. The initiatives will be bolstered by collective actions from
organizations, agencies, and individuals working together to ensure human rights for people with
disabilities are safeguarded (Midgley & Livermore, 2008). The underlying efforts will help
individuals realize that their inputs are pivotal in creating lasting changes, even though it will
take time to overcome existing habits and attitudes. Assisting persons with disabilities to gain
self-knowledge coupled with effective communication gives them the necessary tools to become
self-advocates.
Whether or not continued advocacy is needed to make a long-term impact
The benefits of advocacy are expected to be gradual instead of spontaneous. The action
plan explored herein requires the commitment and dedication of involved parties. Fighting
against discrimination and injustices meted against people with disabilities is a continuous
process. Long-term impact cannot be attained through one-time advocacy (Stuart, 1999). Thus,
pursuing the action plan provided herein over some time, a lasting solution to a societal menace
will be accomplished. Governments will be under constant pressure to have clear laws on how
issues of people with disabilities are addressed. Hence, the restoration of rights of individuals
with disabilities will be given priority, which in turn will ensure that they enjoy their gains
forever.
References
Flynn, E. (2015). Disabled justice?: Access to justice and the UN Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities. Farnham [u.a.: Ashgate.
5
Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social
justice (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series.
Midgley, J., & Livermore, M. M. (Eds.) (2008). The handbook of social policy (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stuart, P. H. (1999). Linking clients and policy: Social work’s distinctive contribution. Social
Work, 44(4), 335-347.
Ward, M. J., & Meyer, R. N. (1999). Self-determination for people with developmental
disabilities and autism: Two self-advocates’ perspectives. Focus on autism and other
developmental disabilities, 14(3), 133-139.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment