SNHU The Definition of Ethnorelativism Communication Essay I have finished a draft of my paper, and my professor gave me some feedback to revise, I just ne

SNHU The Definition of Ethnorelativism Communication Essay I have finished a draft of my paper, and my professor gave me some feedback to revise, I just need revise my original paper and add some new parts, do not write a new one, thank you.

Feedback from my Professor,

Your reflections are great and you are showing good insight and analysis. I love love your subheadings. They make the paper readable and easy.

The definition of ethnorelativism should have been from an academic source, even our own assigned book. After that you put your own definition. But stating the ‘is used to define’ – is inaccurate. Used to define by whom? you need a citation. Also, you in the Jandt reference, the book title needs to be italicized. Not sure why you italicized a part of it but not all of it.

Reflection: Ethnorelativism and Cultural Competency: While you have defined it according to your understanding of it, ethnorelativism should have been defined with a credible source.
Reflection: Sensitivity Issues: You are showing great cultural sensitivity. Good job.
Sources/Citations: Minor error in citations.
Articulation of Response: Well-written paper with good organization and flow. Good job. COM 320 Final Project II Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
For the final project, you will take the role of a communications consultant preparing for an interview. The final project will consist of two components: a media
analysis and recommendations (Final Project I), in which you will make recommendations to media makers about how to adjust your messaging to reflect
cultural competence, and a professional reflection (Final Project II), in which you will consider how your own views about intercultural communication have
developed throughout the course. This document contains the prompt, guidelines, and rubric for Final Project II.
Successful communication professionals exhibit cultural awareness and self-reflection, and they are interculturally sensitive when communicating with others. In
the second component of your final project, you will complete a reflection in which you consider how your own views about intercultural communication have
developed throughout this course.
Final Project II has one milestone, which will be submitted in Module Five to scaffold learning and ensure a quality final submission. The final product will be
submitted in Module Eight.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
•
•
•
Apply concepts of ethnorelativism and cultural competency for the interpretation of multimedia communication
Analyze bias in media systems and ethical challenges faced by media makers for responding ethically to one’s own potential biases while creating media
Reflect on issues faced by media makers in becoming culturally competent
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Prompt
Reflection: Reflect on your developing cultural competency and your understanding of media.
A. Explain the basic concepts behind ethnorelativism and cultural competency that you apply when interpreting and making recommendations
about multimedia communications, using examples to support your claims.
B. Reflect on your own writings in the context of your developing cultural competency and personal ethical guidelines as a communication
professional. How has your perspective changed or developed over time?
C. Describe how you might ethically approach newsgathering and media making regarding subjects for which you may have a potential bias.
D. Reflect on challenges to increasing your cultural competence that you might face as a creator of media.
E. Describe an approach to maintaining awareness of potential sensitivity issues across your career.
Milestones
Final Project II Milestone One: Beginning Reflections
In Module Five, you will begin to outline your personal reflection on the development of your cultural competency and your understanding of media throughout
this course. This milestone will be graded with the Final Project II Milestone One Rubric.
Final Project II Submission: Personal Reflection
In Module Eight, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should
reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project II Rubric.
Final Project II Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your professional reflection should be a 2- to 5-page Microsoft Word document, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman
font and one-inch margins. Cite your supporting sources in APA style.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Reflection:
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
Ethnorelativism and explanation demonstrates an
Cultural Competency advanced awareness of the
relationship between cultural
sensitivity in communications
and the success of media
messages
Explains the basic concepts
behind ethnorelativism and
cultural competency that one
will apply when interpreting and
making recommendations about
multimedia communications,
supporting claims with examples
and/or necessary explanations
Explains the basic concepts
behind ethnorelativism and
cultural competency that one will
apply when interpreting and
making recommendations about
multimedia communications, but
examples are not provided or do
not support the claims, or the
explanation is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Does not explain the basic concepts
behind ethnorelativism and cultural
competency that one will apply
when interpreting and making
recommendations about
multimedia communications
13.6
Reflection: Perspective Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
reflection demonstrates a
sophisticated awareness of
one’s emerging voice as a
communications professional
Reflects on one’s writings in the
context of one’s developing
cultural competency and
personal ethical guidelines as a
communication professional
Reflects on one’s writings in the
context of one’s developing
cultural competency and personal
ethical guidelines as a
communication professional, but
response is cursory or missing key
components
Does not reflect on one’s writings in
the context of one’s developing
cultural competency and personal
ethical guidelines as a
communication professional
22.7
Reflection: Bias
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
description demonstrates a
complex grasp of how to
respond to one’s own bias
ethically
Describes an ethical approach to
newsgathering and media
making regarding subjects for
which one may have a potential
bias
Describes an ethical approach to
newsgathering and media making
regarding subjects for which one
may have a potential bias, but
description is cursory or illogical
or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe an ethical
approach to newsgathering and
media making regarding subjects for
which one may have a potential bias
11.3
Reflection: Challenges Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
reflection demonstrates
considerable thought and
contemplation toward
addressing one’s professional
responsibility to cultural
competency
Reflects on challenges to
increasing one’s cultural
competence that one might face
as a creator of media
Reflects on challenges to
increasing one’s cultural
competence that one might face
as a creator of media, but
reflection is cursory, illogical, or
missing key components
Does not reflect on challenges to
increasing one’s cultural
competence that one might face as
a creator of media
22.7
Reflection: Sensitivity Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
Issues
the approach described
demonstrates considerable
thought and contemplation
toward addressing one’s
professional responsibility to
cultural competency across
one’s career
Describes an approach to
Describes an approach to
Does not describe an approach to
maintaining awareness of
maintaining awareness of
maintaining awareness of potential
potential sensitivity issues across potential sensitivity issues across sensitivity issues across one’s career
one’s career
one’s career, but the approach
described is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar, related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
spelling, syntax, or organization
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization that
prevent understanding of ideas
Total
22.7
7.0
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment