Racial Slurs are insults or disparaging remarks of a racist nature Assignment | Get Paper Help

i want a essay of four paragraph and use Hill’s bookBe sure to discuss Personalist Ideology, Folk Psychology, and the Heart and Head defense.

Gaffes vs. Slurs
What’s the difference?
Racial Slurs are insults or disparaging remarks of a racist nature.
They have three defining characteristics:
•
Racial slurs are direct attacks that are not generally misunderstood.
•
When a racial slur is used, it is generally believed or understood
that the user is racist.
•
The typical defense for having used a racial slur, is denial that the
word is, in fact, a slur. The defense focuses on the word itself.

Gaffes: Intention Matters

“Don’t monkey this Ron DeSantis

“There aren’t enough white David Stringer

“What’s wrong with Megyn Kelly

“They’re sending people with Trump
Gaffes figure slightly differently in contrast to slurs.
•
Gaffes are not regarded as attacks, but misunderstandings
•
When someone commits a racial gaffe, the racist nature of the actor is not
certain.
•
In fact, the common defense is that while the remark might be racist, the
speaker is not, or does not “intend” to be taken as racist.

Gaffes and White Privilege

Regarding Gaffes, “The actual linguistic content of slurs and
gaffes can be identical; one commentator’s slur is another’s
gaffe. And both types of metalinguistic discourses defending
words in the case of slurs, but speakers in the case of gaffes
reproduce racializing stigma, protect White virtue, and
advance White privilege by denying the existence of White
racism.” Jane Hill

Personalist Ideology

Personalist linguistic ideology

Many Whites in the United States share a linguistic ideology called
“personalism” Duranti 1993; Rosaldo 1981).

Personalism prescribes that each individual has an
inperceivable inner being which houses our beliefs,
intentions and emotional states such as love and hatred.

Personalist ideology prescribes a “personal meaning” that
transcends what a speaker actually says, and that this
meaning inhabits not only the content of words, but the
intention behind our words.

Personalist Ideology

This ideology is evident in our system of virtues when we
praise people for “meaning what they say, and saying what
they mean”.

The result of this ideology:

Words not only represent the world, but inner states of people.

Speakers are can say one thing and mean another.

Listeners are burdened with having infer meaning beyond
words

Instances of personalist ideology:

“Turn left”. The driver turns left. “Oops, I mean right. Turn
right.”

“I’m not racist, but..(insert

“I don’t mean to hurt your feelings, but (insert

Personalist Ideology

More results of personalist ideology:

The ability to distinguish between two types of lies.

Deception: where a speaker uses words that do not match their
beliefs in order to mislead.

Error: where a speaker uses words that match their beliefs, but
the beliefs are wrong.

The recognition of forms of talk such as irony and
parody.