PUAD 750 Ohio State University Holy Spirit Church Bookkeeper Case Discussion One of the main purposes of this course is to examine the ethics of leadership

PUAD 750 Ohio State University Holy Spirit Church Bookkeeper Case Discussion One of the main purposes of this course is to examine the ethics of leadership and to apply effective leadership decision-making strategies. In this assignment, you will assess the ethics and leadership issues in the Holy Spirit Church Bookkeeper case.

Action Items
Complete your assigned reading, including the Holy Spirit Church Bookkeeper case.
Read the rubric.
Respond to the Discuss topic Holy Spirit Church. Your response is address the following issues or questions and reference relevant readings:
Ethics of Suzie’s Actions: Where Suzie’s actions right or ethical given the mission of the church and the Haven? If not, what should Suzie have done? Explain and justify your answer.
Ethics and the Council’s Response: How should the leadership of the church (the church council) deal with Suzie? Explain and justify your answer from an ethical and leadership perspective. Be sure to identify the ethical and leadership perspectives you are applying.
The Ethical Responsibilities of Leadership: How did the Council and its policies contribute to the situation, if at all? For example, what effect did the church’s organizational structure and its oversight have on the situation? Also, what actions or policies should the organizational leadership put in place to mitigate this type of risk in the future?
Ethics and Context: The case involves a faith-based nonprofit. What if it was a government agency or a non-faith-based nonprofit? Would the type of organization involved make a difference in terms your assessment of the situation? Explain and support your answer. PUAD 750
Firstname Lastname
1
Holy Spirit Church Case
Week 3
Posting #1: Initial
Response to the
DISCUSS topic
Holy Spirit
Church
Posting #2:
Response to the
posting made by
one of your
classmates
Unacceptable
0-23 pts.
Reply posting was
minimal or
missing.
a). Ethics of Suzie’s Actions
b). Ethics and the Council’s
Response
c). The Ethical
Responsibilities Leadership
d). Ethics and Context Ethics
and Context
Unacceptable
0-6 pts.
The response
posting was
minimal or
missing
Unacceptable
0-6 pts.
Posting #3:
Response to your
classmate’s
comments on your
original posting
Meets Expectations
24-26 pts.
Reply posting contributed to
the discussion of the
following:
Third reply
posting was
minimal or
missing
Meets Expectations
7-8 pts.
The response posting
contributed to the discussion
of the following:
Exceeds Expectations
27-30 pts.
Reply posting demonstrated
student critical thinking skills
and contributed to the discussion
of the following:
a). Ethics of Suzie’s Actions
b). Ethics and the Council’s
Response
c). The Ethical Responsibilities
Leadership
d). Ethics and Context Ethics
and Context
Exceeds Expectations
9-10 pts.
The response posting
demonstrated student critical
thinking skills and contributed to
the discussion of the following:
a). Comparing and
contrasting student initial
posting with other student
posting(s)
b). Providing a different
insight or perspective
c).Respectfully refuting their
classmate
d) Discussing the impact of
the context of the situation
a). Comparing and contrasting
student initial posting with other
student posting(s)
b). Providing a different insight
or perspective
c).Respectfully refuting their
classmate
d) Discussing the impact of the
context of the situation
Meets Expectations
7-8 pts.
Exceeds Expectations
9-10 pts.
The response posting
contributed to the discussion
of the topic Holy Spirit
Church
The response posting
demonstrated student critical
thinking skills and contributed to
the discussion of the topic Holy
Spirit Church
Total
Possible = 50 pts.
Comments:
Score
Score
Score

Purchase answer to see full
attachment