PSY402 Grand Canyon University Memory Strategies Paper Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay that applies memory strategies to your daily life. Include the follow

PSY402 Grand Canyon University Memory Strategies Paper Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay that applies memory strategies to your daily life. Include the following:

Explain cognitive mapping and one other memory strategy of your choosing from the course materials.
Explain at least two positive effects of using each memory strategy in daily life.

Using the GCU Library databases, include a minimum of four sources, one of which may be the textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

The paper must include a thesis statement. The rubric is attached in this file. Course Code
PSY-402
Class Code
PSY-402-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Explain cognitive mapping and one other
memory strategy.
35.0%
Explain two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life.
35.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Memory Strategies
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Explanation of cognitive mapping and one other memory
strategy is missing.
Explanation of two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life is missing.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Explanation of cognitive mapping and one other memory
strategy is vague and inconsistent.
Explanation of two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life is vague and inconsistent.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Explanation of cognitive mapping and one other memory
strategy is present.
Explanation of two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life is present.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
Explanation of cognitive mapping and one other memory
strategy is present, clear, and makes some connection to
research.
Explanation of two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life is present, clear, and makes some
connection to research.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Explanation of cognitive mapping and one other memory
strategy is clear, concise, and makes connections to current
research.
Explanation of two positive effects of using memory
strategies in daily life is clear, concise, and makes connections
to current research.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Comments
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment