Prince Sultan University Frank Serpico and Daniel Ellsberg Whistleblower Case Essay i will be submitting the two files of the different cases. i want the w

Prince Sultan University Frank Serpico and Daniel Ellsberg Whistleblower Case Essay i will be submitting the two files of the different cases. i want the writer to follow the attached rubrics and do the comparison.

Submit your answers to the following questions. Support your ideas with examples from the whistle-blower cases you studied.

What are the moral and ethical justifications of whistle-blowing?
In your view, do the actions of whistle-blowers help or hurt the society? Explain.
What would you have done if you had been in the positions of the whistle-blowers in the two cases that you studied? Why?
Provide an example of how someone your age could expose and publicly raise concerns about misconduct or wrongdoing.

Word limit 1000 words

Double space and use Times New Roman font 12.

Marks will be deducted for spelling and grammar errors Running Head: WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
Whistleblower: Frank Serpico
Sara Alghamdi
ELAN460
1
WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
2
Overview
Frank Serpico is a New York police officer who reported police corruption within the New
York Police Department. The story portrays the real-life factors and events taking place in the
police force currently. Many ethical issues occurred from men being beaten, lied to, punished, and
even deceived (Bell, 2017). Serpico witnessed corruption but ended up being neglected in his hour
of need. Undoubtedly, the officers never worked collaboratively, positively, and ethically to get
everything going in the right direction.
The problem observed
One man in the New York City police department stood out early in the 1970s. Addressed
as a hero and despised by some, Frank Serpico hit the headlines as a whistleblower. The officer
was against the culture of corruption and bribery that seemed like a trend within the unit. This
story shows disappointment with the NYPD with fascinating accounts of a possible drug bust that
made him be shot.
Addressing the problem
Controlling corruption is expected to be successful by paying significant attention to
external governance and oversight. Bocchiaro and Zimbardo (2017) said that such mechanisms
include citizen complaints, human rights commissions, and police auditors are heralded as
essential instruments for keeping accountability. Of course, reformation efforts will not be
incomplete or limited if carried out with independent monitoring. The established watchdog should
be independent of political or police control. The process will win public trust, ensure confidence
in outcomes, and monitor all the corrupt systems. Achieving this prevents further hostile factors
that easily disrupt ethical practices and enable the police force to regain and retain public support
during serious scandals.
WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
3
If he did nothing, then the officers would continue with the acts. No special emphasis
would be put on publicizing the successful prosecution or arrest of prominent officers. The ethical
implications of doing nothing include loss of reputation of the entire system. The principles of
protecting the interest of the public interest would not exist. As a result, the lack of such measures
would lead to adverse damages to the organization’s reputation and even the others who never
participate in the acts.
Risks of making information public
When Frank reported the activities of the unethical colleagues, he got shot. The partners
abandoned him at the time, making this attack seem to have been planned (Watts & Buckley,
2017). Frank made the information public by reporting to the media, and the story hit the headlines
in the New York Times. The outcome was that John Lindsay, the mayor, got forced to select an
investigation team. The Knapp Commission was to probe the truth regarding the information.
What I would do
If I were in Frank’s position, I would also testify to the public against police officers who
break the code of work. One reason is that the activities the colleagues engaged in are unethical.
Receiving bribes and selling drugs are against the regulation. When the people in authority do
nothing about reported cases of corruption, then it is alarming that they could be a part of the
dealings. Basically, like Serpico, I would want to do my job, which entailed upholding the law
while also protecting the public interests. I love public service; thus; I would find it hard to
accept and witness power abuse and corruption.
WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
4
Whistleblowers
What problem was observed?
Frank Serpico
Some people in the community and even his
colleagues participated in corruption.
Police officers received cash bribes.
Some sold drugs to earn extra money.
What could this person do to address the
Frank would have reported to the New York
problem? What were the ethics of doing
mayor and the captain.
nothing?
What were the risks of making information Employer retribution through a hostile
about the problem public?
workplace.
Subjection to frustration by superiors.
Personal security risks.
Abandoned when he need help.
How did this person make the information
Frank addressed the problem by reporting to
public?
the media.
The story hit the headlines in the New York
Times.
WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
5
Refusing to accept bribes and also risking his
security to expose anyone doing it.
What was the outcome of making this
As a police officer, Serpico experienced
information public?
frustration.
He became subject to anxiousness in the
hands of his superiors.
Got into an atmosphere where a dishonest
officer is feared by the honest officer.
WHISTLEBLOWER: FRANK SERPICO
6
References
Bell, J. (2017, November 3). ‘Never run when you’re right’: The real story of NYPD
whistleblower Frank Serpico. American Civil Liberties
Union. https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/employee-speech-andwhistleblowers/never-run-when-youre-right-real-story-nypd
Bocchiaro, P., & Zimbardo, P. (2017). On the dynamics of disobedience: experimental
investigations of defying unjust authority. Psychology research and behavior
management, 10, 219.
Watts, L. L., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). A dual-processing model of moral whistleblowing in
organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(3), 669-683.
Whistleblowers
What problem was observed?
What could this person do to address the
problem? What were the ethics of doing
nothing?
What were the risks of making information
about the problem public?
Daniel Ellsberg
That Daniel Ellsberg was a whistleblower
where he revealed that the US government
had the knowledge that the war is most likely
not be won
Ellsberg had the option to not leak the
information which will make the citizens
safer since the war will not be extended.
Not doing anything about it will be
considered cruel and selfish since the leak
affected everyone negatively.
The risk was leaking the private information
which lead into the extension of the war and
obviously increased the number of victims
How did this person make the information
public?
By leaking the Pentagon Papers
What was the outcome of making this
information public?
Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage
Act of 1917 along with other charges of theft
and conspiracy

Purchase answer to see full
attachment