Pacific High School Shakespeares Relevance in the Current Society Essay Write or present a convincing argument with supporting textual evidence from the te

Pacific High School Shakespeares Relevance in the Current Society Essay Write or present a convincing argument with supporting textual evidence from the texts in the course, as well as others of your own choosing, as to why Shakespeare still matters or does not matter. Explain whether his writing reflects the human condition or not. Is Shakespearean literature still relatable today? Explain with reasons and textual evidence.

If writing: In an essay, convince your audience as to why Shakespeare still matters or does not matter. Does his writing reflect the human condition today? Explain your ideas clearly with two to three reasons why Shakespeare still is or is not important today.

Whichever format you choose, ensure that your work is accompanied by appropriately documented sources within text, and in a reference list.

Criteria

Excellent

20 points

Proficient

15 points

Emerging

10 points

Developing

5 points

Unsatisfactory

0 points

Criterion Score

Content and Organization

All content is relevant to presentation or essay topic, and is well organized in a clear and logical sequence.

Most of the content is relevant to the presentation or essay topic; sequence of main ideas is effective.

Some of the content is relevant to the presentation or essay topic; sequence of main ideas is good but could be improved.

Much of the content is not relevant to the essay or presentation topic; some main ideas seem to be out of logical sequence.

Content is confusing or not relevant to the presentation or essay topic; there is no clear plan for the organization of information.

/ 20

Effectiveness of Argument

Argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound; each point is supported by persuasive textual evidence using MLA formatting.

Argument is identifiable, but could be clearer; it’s mostly reasonable, and sound; most points are supported by persuasive textual evidence using MLA formatting.

Either argument is not identifiable OR not all points are sufficiently supported by evidence.

Argument is barely reasonable and is barely identifiable; few points are supported by evidence. Insufficient support from sources are used.

Argument is not identifiable and insufficiently supported or no sources used at all.

/ 20

Formatting / Overall Literacy and Techniques

Essay is double-spaced, uses correct font, and the message is clearly enhanced by writing techniques and literary skills.

If using multimedia, use of visuals, tables, charts, illustrations, or graphics have a clear relation to the topic and effectively enhance the presentation.

The format meets all the device and technique requirements, with only a little difficulty at one or two points. The use of these techniques is mostly clear and directly related to the author’s message.

If using multimedia, use of visuals, tables, charts, illustrations, or graphics have a mostly clear relation to the topic and effectively enhance the presentation.

The format meets all the device and technique requirements, but not always with ease. The use of these techniques is clearly and directly related to the author’s message.

If using multimedia, use of visuals, tables, charts, illustrations, or graphics are somewhat clearly related to the topic and may not sufficiently enhance the presentation.

The essay is missing one of the required devices or techniques. I am not always able to decipher how these devices or techniques are functioning in this format or how these devices or techniques relate to the author’s message.

The essay is missing more than one of the required devices and techniques. I cannot identify the purpose of the remaining techniques and devices and how they are related to the author’s message.

If using multimedia, use of visuals, tables, charts, illustrations, or graphics are unrelated to the topic and do not add to the overall presentation.

/ 20

Language

Academic language forms (including focus words) are used correctly and consistently, except for cases where conversational language is used for specific efects.

Academic language forms (including focus words) are used frequently and mostly correctly, but not consistently

Academic language forms (including focus words) are attempted, but they are somewhat sporadic, with a few that are incorrect.

Academic language forms (including focus words) are barely there; they are very sporadic; with most used incorrectly.

Academic language forms (including focus words) are used incorrectly, or not at all.

/ 20

Mechanics

The work is practically flawless in terms of grammar, mechanics, and language.

The work has only minor errors in grammar, mechanics, and language.

The work has 2-3 errors in grammar, mechanics, and language.

The errors in grammar, mechanics, and language interrupted the flow of reading.

Numerous misspellings or grammatical errors interfere with the meaning of the argument. Ineffective writing style or poor word choice throughout.

/ 20