NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary Paper Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniq
NURS 6512 Middle Tennessee State WK1 Building a Health History Summary Paper Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.
This is my patient: 76-year-old black male with disabilities living in an urban setting
This it the risk assessment instrument- POMR (Problem-Oriented Medical Record)
1. Comprehensive health history
2. Complete physical examination
3. Problem list
4. Assessment and plan
5. Baseline and problem-directed laboratory and radiologic imaging studies
6. Progress notes
APA format- 3 sources cited. Interview style, relevant questions pertaining to the patient. Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
Main Posting
List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
45 (45%) – 50
40 (40%) – 44
35 (35%) – 39
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
“Responds to
some of the
Discussion
question(s).
One or two
criteria are not
addressed or
are super”cially
addressed. Is
somewhat
lacking
re!ection and
critical analysis
and synthesis.
Somewhat
represents
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module.
Post is cited
with two
credible
sources.
Written
somewhat
concisely; may
contain more
than two
spelling or
grammatical
errors. Contains
“Does not
respond to the
Discussion
question(s)
adequately.
Lacks depth or
super”cially
addresses
criteria. Lacks
re!ection and
critical analysis
and synthesis.
Does not
represent
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module.
Contains only
one or no
credible
sources. Not
written clearly
or concisely.
Contains more
than two
spelling or
grammatical
errors. Does
not adhere to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.
(50%)
“Answers all
parts of the
Discussion
question(s) with
re!ective
critical analysis
and synthesis
of knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.
Supported by
at least three
current,
credible
sources.
Written clearly
and concisely
with no
grammatical or
spelling errors
and fully
adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.
(44%)
“Responds to
the Discussion
question(s) and
is re!ective
with critical
analysis and
synthesis of
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. At
least 75% of
post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth.
Supported by
at least three
credible
sources.
Written clearly
and concisely
with one or no
grammatical or
spelling errors
and fully
adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.
(39%)
some APA
formatting
errors.
Main Post:
Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10
(10%)
Posts main
post by Day 3.
First
Response
Second
Response
17 (17%) – 18
(18%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
N/A
Does not post
main post by
Day 3.
15 (15%) – 16
13 (13%) – 14
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
(16%)
(14%)
“Response may
not be on topic
and lacks
depth.
Responses
posted in the
Discussion lack
e#ective
professional
communication.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
missing. No
credible
sources are
cited.
“Response
exhibits
synthesis,
critical thinking,
and application
to practice
settings.
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by at
least two
scholarly
sources.
Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of Learning
Objectives.
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
fully answered,
if posed.
Response is
e#ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.
“Response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings.
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
answered, if
posed. Provides
clear, concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources.
Response is
e#ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.
“Response is on
topic and may
have some
depth.
Responses
posted in the
Discussion may
lack e#ective
professional
communication.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Response may
lack clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are
cited.
16 (16%) – 17
14 (14%) – 15
12 (12%) – 13
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
“Response is on
topic and may
have some
“Response may
not be on topic
and lacks
depth.
(17%)
“Response
exhibits
synthesis,
(15%)
“Response
exhibits critical
thinking and
(13%)
Participation
critical thinking,
and application
to practice
settings.
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by at
least two
scholarly
sources.
Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of Learning
Objectives.
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
fully answered,
if posed.
Response is
e#ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.
application to
practice
settings.
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
answered, if
posed. Provides
clear, concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources.
Response is
e#ectively
written in
standard,
edited English.
depth.
Responses
posted in the
Discussion may
lack e#ective
professional
communication.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Response may
lack clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are
cited.
Responses
posted in the
Discussion lack
e#ective
professional
communication.
Responses to
faculty
questions are
missing. No
credible
sources are
cited.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Meets
requirements
for
participation by
posting on
three di#erent
days.
N/A
N/A
Does not meet
requirements
for participation
by posting on
three di#erent
days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
We've got everything to become your favourite writing service
Money back guarantee
Your money is safe. Even if we fail to satisfy your expectations, you can always request a refund and get your money back.
Confidentiality
We don’t share your private information with anyone. What happens on our website stays on our website.
Our service is legit
We provide you with a sample paper on the topic you need, and this kind of academic assistance is perfectly legitimate.
Get a plagiarism-free paper
We check every paper with our plagiarism-detection software, so you get a unique paper written for your particular purposes.
We can help with urgent tasks
Need a paper tomorrow? We can write it even while you’re sleeping. Place an order now and get your paper in 8 hours.
Pay a fair price
Our prices depend on urgency. If you want a cheap essay, place your order in advance. Our prices start from $11 per page.