NUR 3165 Bowie State University Benchmark Part B Fall in Geriatric Patients Project In Part A, you described the geriatric population and quality initiativ

NUR 3165 Bowie State University Benchmark Part B Fall in Geriatric Patients Project In Part A, you described the geriatric population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

Use the Grand Canyon University Library to Perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

PICOT Statement: Among Geriatric patients in a skilled nursing facility (P) Do Implementation of hourly rounds, use of bed alarms, and nursing staff education (I) compared to use of bed alarm only (C) decrease the rate of falls (O) over 8weeks period (T)?

In a paper of 1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT include the following:

Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.
Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles
Synthesize the Literature:
Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT;
Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.
Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite 8 peer reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide Course Code
NUR-550
Class Code
NUR-550-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Introduction
5.0%
Methods
15.0%
Literature Synthesis, Part A
15.0%
Literature Synthesis, Part B
15.0%
Areas of Further Study
15.0%
Required Sources
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
An introduction is not included.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the
articles, is not included.
A discussion of the main components of each article,
including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for
how the article supports the PICOT statement, is not
included.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and
differences of the studies is not included.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is
known, unknown, and needed for further study is not
included.
Sources are not included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
250.0
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)
An introduction is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the
articles, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of the main components of each article,
including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for
how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present, but
it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and
differences of the studies is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is
known, unknown, and needed for further study is present,
but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (88.00%)
An introduction is present.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the
articles, is present.
A discussion of the main components of each article,
including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for
how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and
differences of the studies is present.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is
known, unknown, and needed for further study is present.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated
or inappropriate.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (92.00%)
An introduction is clearly provided and well developed.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the
articles, is clearly provided and well developed.
A discussion of the main components of each article,
including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for
how the article supports the PICOT statement, is clearly
provided and well developed.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and
differences of the studies is clearly provided and well
developed.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is
known, unknown, and needed for further study is clearly
provided and well developed.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but
not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria
and nursing content.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A comprehensive introduction is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of methods, including criteria
used to select the articles, is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of the main components of each
article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and
rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is
thoroughly developed with supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of the limitations, controversies,
similarities, and differences of the studies is thoroughly
developed with supporting details.
A comprehensive analysis of evidence in the articles to
identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further
study is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current,
and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing
content.
Comments
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment