Northwest Florida State College 11 Journal Articles Annotated Bibliography Do not worry about formatting, I will take care of all of that. A written summa

Northwest Florida State College 11 Journal Articles Annotated Bibliography Do not worry about formatting, I will take care of all of that.

A written summary (synthesizing) of the key concept(s) of 11 Specific journal articles (provided). Each articles summary should be 200 to 250 words and each one should focus on the following questions:

o Why was the study conducted and/or what themes emerge from the theory/article?

o What was the population studied?

o What did the researcher(s) conclude?

o What other information about this study do you believe is unique or important to recall? (I’m looking for limitations in this element.)

The eleven (11) articles are:

Monson, C. M., Shields, N., Suvak, M. K., Lane, J. E. M., Shnaider, P., Landy, M. S. H., Wagner, A. C., Sijercic, I., Masina, T., Wanklyn, S. G., & Stirman, S. W. (2018). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of training strategies in cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Impact on patient outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 110, 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.08.007

Peterson, A. L., Resick, P. A., Mintz, J., Young-McCaughan, S., McGeary, D. D., McGeary, C. A., Velligan, D. I., Macdonald, A., Mata-Galan, E., Holliday, S. L., Dillon, K. H., Roache, J. D., Williams Christians, I., Moring, J. C., Bira, L. M., Nabity, P. S., Hancock, A. K., & Hale, W. J. (2018). Design of a clinical effectiveness trial of in-home cognitive processing therapy for combat-related PTSD. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 73, 27–35. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.08.005

Peterson, A. L., Foa, E. B., Resick, P. A., Hoyt, T. V., Straud, M. C. L. B. A., Favret, J. V., Hale, W. J., Litz, B. T., Rogers, T. E., Stone, J. M., Villarreal, R., Woodson, C. S., & Young-McCaughan, M. S. J. (2020). A Nonrandomized Trial of Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Deployed Setting. Behavior Therapy. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2020.01.003

Rauch, S. A. M., Koola, C., Post, L., Yasinski, C., Norrholm, S. D., Black, K., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2018). In session extinction and outcome in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for PTSD. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 109, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.07.003

Silverstein, M. W., Petri, J. M., Kramer, L. B., & Weathers, F. W. (n.d.). An item response theory analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5: Implications for DSM-5 and ICD-11. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 70. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102190

Sripada, R. K., Blow, F. C., Rauch, S. A. M., Ganoczy, D., Hoff, R., Harpaz-Rotem, I., & Bohnert, K. M. (2019). Examining the nonresponse phenomenon: Factors associated with treatment response in a national sample of veterans undergoing residential PTSD treatment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 63, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.02.001

Sripada, R. K., Ready, D. J., Ganoczy, D., Astin, M. C., & Rauch, S. A. M. (2020). When to Change the Treatment Plan: An Analysis of Diminishing Returns in VA Patients Undergoing Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 51(1), 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.003

Straud, C. L., Siev, J., Messer, S., & Zalta, A. K. (2019). Examining military population and trauma type as moderators of treatment outcome for first-line psychotherapies for PTSD: A meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 67. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102133

Szafranski, D. D., Smith, B. N., Gros, D. F., Risick, P. A. (2017). High rates of PTSD treatment dropout: A possible red herring? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 47. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.01.002

Thorp, S. R., Glassman, L. H., Wells, S. Y., Walter, K. H., Gebhardt, H., Twamley, E., Golshan, S., Pittman, J., Penski, K., Allard, C., Morland, L. A., & Wetherell, J. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of prolonged exposure therapy versus relaxation training for older veterans with military-related PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 64, 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.02.003

Trachik, B., Bowers, C., Neer, S. M., Nguyen, V., Frueh, B. C., & Beidel, D. C. (2018). Combat-related guilt and the mechanisms of exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 102, 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.11.006 Google CEO Sundar Pichai, One of the World’s Most Powerful Business Leaders
A few years ago Sundar Pichai became CEO of Google, the major division of Alphabet. He is an
unassuming man of humble beginnings, growing up with his parents and a brother in a two-room
apartment in the Chennai, India. Always brilliant, as shown in his ability to memorize hundreds
of numbers dialed on a rotary phone, he was a reserved but fiercely competitive student. Pichai
has been described as the most powerful person in mobile. His rise to Google CEO took eleven
years, based on his technical knowledge, team player attitudes, and astuteness about
organizational politics. Today, Pichai’s main responsibility is to assure that Google’s core
business and major source of revenue stay strong. From his entry into Google as a product
manager in 2004, Pichai has played a major role in the development of a series of key company
products. His first assignment was to work on the Google toolbar which, in turn, lead to
managing the team that developed the Chrome browser. The success of Chrome was the engine
that powered Pichai through a rapid ascent to the CEO position. After the launch of Chrome,
Pichai was promoted to vice president, and shortly thereafter to senior vice president. Pichai took
over the all-important Android division of Google in 2013. One of his accomplishments was to
make sure that Android was carefully integrated into Google proper rather than be run as a
separate division. His team was later responsible for developing the Chrome OS, operating
systems used in Chrome laptops. Based on his success with these key products, Google
cofounder Larry Page put him in charge of almost all the company’s products and services
including Google+ and advertising. In announcing the promotion, Page said, “Sundar has a
tremendous ability to see what’s ahead and mobilize teams around the super important stuff.” A
former product manager at Google attributed part of Pichai’s rise to power for having recruited,
mentored, and retained a highly effective team. His team of product mangers has a reputation of
being the best of the best. Furthermore, Pichai has avoided making enemies. He navigated
organizational politics at Google to help his team be successful while not adversely affecting
other teams. In terms of his focus on teams, Pichai says, “Nothing makes me happier than a
product review in which I can sit with the team and they’re showing me something they’re
building.” People who work closely with Pichai comment favorably on his empathy, humor, and
eagerness to encourage teamwork across Google. Soft-spoken and polite, Pichai supported
whatever team he led, and ensured that the efforts of every team member were recognized by
outsiders to the team. When attending team meetings, Pichai would usually sit in the back, listen
quietly, and then after everyone else had spoken, present a collaborative idea. Since he is at
Google, Pichai has been well liked. He enjoys good rapport with Page, as well as with company
outsiders. For example, he has visited South Korea to help forge a good relationship with
Samsung executives. Because of his reputation of being enjoyable to work with many workers
wanted to transfer to his organizational unit. It was therefore easier for Pichai to have built strong
teams. (This observation was made prior to his CEO appointment, when he was directly in
charge of teams.) A vice president who worked with Pichai for eight years said, “I would
challenge you to find anyone at Google who doesn’t like Sundar or who thinks he’s a jerk.”
Pichai is a graduate of the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, with a major in
metallurgical and materials engineering. He also holds a master’s degree in science from
Stanford University, and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
QUESTIONS
1. What sources of power does Pichai appear to have acquired?
2. Google has loads of technically skilled, intelligent, and ambitious people. What do you think
really gave Sundar Pichai an edge?

Purchase answer to see full
attachment