MGT 655 GCU Process Improvement Supply Chain Processes of Coca Cola Review Process Improvement Project For this assignment select either your own organiza

MGT 655 GCU Process Improvement Supply Chain Processes of Coca Cola Review Process Improvement Project For this assignment select either your own organization or an organization about which you know enough to review the supply chain processes and identify a process that can be improved in your sphere of influence. Phase I: Improvement Opportunity Write 500-750 words on improvement opportunity in your sphere of influence. Address each of the following sections: Quality Tool Analysis Identify your problem statement and complete a root-cause analysis. Identify which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem. Explain the quantitative and qualitative tools you used and provide a summary of how you arrived at your problem. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Process Improvement Project
For this assignment select either your own organization or an organization about which you
know enough to review the supply chain processes and identify a process that can be improved in
your sphere of influence.
Phase I: Improvement Opportunity
Write 500-750 words on improvement opportunity in your sphere of influence. Address each of
the following sections:
Quality Tool Analysis
Identify your problem statement and complete a root-cause analysis. Identify which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem. Explain the quantitative and qualitative tools you used
and provide a summary of how you arrived at your problem.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, An abstract is
not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Course Code
MGT-655
Class Code
MGT-655-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Quality Tool Analysis
40.0%
Stakeholder Analysis
30.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation
10.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
10.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Process Improvement Project: Phase I
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement,
root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative
and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you
arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and
a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement,
root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak
connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation
of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary
of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and
a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes
weak connections with several gaps in presentation.
Supporting sources are present and that show limited
understanding of the content.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement,
root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections
at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation
of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary
of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and
a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes
connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps.
Supporting sources are present and show some
understanding of the content.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement,
root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and
integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps.
An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used
and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and
a summary that of all considerations for all stakeholders is
clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with
no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the
understanding of the content.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement,
root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools
you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well
integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps.
An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used
and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and
a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is
thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful
connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present
that illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment