MGMT 5325 Wayland Baptist University Velo V Project Case Study Once you have summarized the case, identified the problem(s), and devised your recommendatio

MGMT 5325 Wayland Baptist University Velo V Project Case Study Once you have summarized the case, identified the problem(s), and devised your recommendations, answer the following questions:Who are the key stakeholders?What are the sequences of change that have to happen?What do you see as the key activities and initiatives?After answering these questions, be sure to wrap up your Case Study by sharing your Personal Reflections on what you learned from the case and any closing thoughts. 1
Title of Case
Anthony A. Student
School of Business, Wayland Baptist University
MGMT 5325: Organization Development and Change
Dr. Ernie Rahn
Date
2
Title of Case
Start text of introduction.
Summary of Case
Start text of heading.
Level 2 Heading
Add level-2 and lower headings as required.
Level 3 Heading
Add level-3 and lower headings as required.
Level 4 heading. Add level-4 and lower headings as required.
Level 5 heading. Add level-5 heading as required. Copy and paste Level 2-5 headers
below Level-1 headers as needed in subsequent sections of the paper.
Problem Identification
Start text of heading.
Recommendations
Start text of heading.
Response to Case Questions
Start text of heading.
Personal Reflections
Start text of heading.
3
References
Author A. A. (2017). Full title of work, with only first or proper nouns capitalized. Title of
Periodical, 6(1). 125-133. http://doi.org/000000000/xxxxxxxxxx
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. Organizational development and change (11th ed.). Cengage
Learning.
Student Name:
MGMT 5325 Case Study Grading Rubric
Criteria
CONTENT
Summary of Case
Study
Identification of the
Problem
Recommendations
based on the Case
Study
1 – Unsatisfactory
55%
2 – Less than Satisfactory
65%
3 – Satisfactory
75%
Summarization of case is
poorly developed, without
explanation or supporting
details.
Summarization is inadequately
developed or incomplete with
little explanation or supporting
details.
Summarization of case is
included, but lacks explanation
and relevant supporting
details.
Case problem is inadequately
identified
Recommendations do not align
with problem.
Case problem is not clearly
identified or explained.
Recommendations are
inadequately developed or are
incomplete.
Case problem is adequately
identified and explained.
Recommendations are
included but lack explanation
and relevant supporting
details.
Case study questions are
poorly answered or lack
substantiation.
Case study questions are
minimally answered, lacking
good explanation of answers.
Individual reflections are not
adequately explained or are
unclear.
Individual reflections are
Individual reflections are
adequate, but need more
present and explained.
explanation for understanding.
Case Study Questions Case study questions are
inaccurately answered.
Individual Reflections
on the Case Study
Individual reflections are not
aligned with the information in
the case study.
4 – Good
85%
5 – Excellent
100%
Summarization of case is
complete and includes
explanation and relevant
supporting details.
Summarization of case is
complete and thorough and
includes relevant and
supporting details,
substantiated by credible
sources.
Case problem is identified and Case problem is clearly
explained.
identified and explained.
Recommendations are
Recommendations are
complete and include
extremely thorough and
explanation and relevant
include substantial explanation
supporting details.
and relevant supporting
details.
Case Study questions are
Case Study questions are fully
answered completely but could answered and substantiated
be further explained.
with credible sources.
Max
Perf
Points Column
15
10
20
15
Individual reflections are
complete and thorough,
explained and cited well.
SUMMARY
Writing
15
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language
are employed.
Writer is clearly in command of
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a standard, written, academic
few may be present. The writer English.
uses a variety of effective
sentence structures and
figures of speech.
Paper Format (use of
appropriate APA style
and paper layout for
the assignment)
Format and APA style are not
used appropriately, or
documentation format and APA
style rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate format and style
are used, but some elements
are missing or mistaken. A lack
of control with formatting is
apparent.
Appropriate format and APA
style are used. Formatting and
style are correct, although
some minor errors may be
present.
Appropriate format and style
All format and APA style
are fully used. There are
elements are correct.
virtually no errors in formatting
and/or style.
10
Documentation of
Sources (citations,
references, etc., as
appropriate to
assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and
style, with numerous formatting
errors.
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting
errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly
correct.
5
Paper Length
Late Submission
Originality Report >20%
Final Grade
Final Comments:
Deductions / Adjustments
Number of Body Pages
Purchase answer to see full
attachment