Measuring Safety, Health and Wellbeing Performance Assignment | Online Assignment

This assessment requires you to review health, safety and wellbeing leading and lagging data from a case study provided or organisation you are familiar with. and make a short 15-minute presentation evaluating
You are required to review the data, evaluate the current health, safety and wellbeing performance levels within the organisation and make recommendations for possible improvements in the future.
The 15-minute presentation should include a power point presentation (or equivalent) and will be followed by a short 5 to 10-minute question and answer session.

Marking Criteria:
Students will be graded on their ability to:
 Accurately interpret and analyse leading and lagging data (20%)
 Undertake external comparison and/or benchmarking (20%)
 Evaluate the organisations current safety, health and wellbeing performance (20%)
 Make appropriate recommendations for possible improvements in the future (20%)
 Question & Answer (10%)
 Organisation of material and presentation (5%)
 Appropriate structure, grammar and referencing of sources in Harvard referencing style (5%)

Attention:
I have a Case Study folder which is 15mb above will be sent via email. Kindly focus this presentation on the case study, please also
include chart graphs

Mirus safety, health & wellbeing performance indicators
Executive Summary
This report aims to identify strengths and weaknesses of performance indicator collection
methods, as well as the robustness of indicators produced for informing and improving
safety, health and wellbeing (SHW) performance.
Mirus provided data on the following topics:
• Employee assistance programme (EAP)
• HR data – Including sickness and absence data
• Health and Safety (HS) Auditing
• Investors in People (IIP) report
• Staff surveys
Key strengths identified were the use of external companies, providing unbiased, valid and
reliable EAP and IIP indicators, this was also seen through the use of an online staff survey
platform. It was evident that internally collected data methods were carried out in a way
that reduced bias as best as reasonably practicable to produce robust data, this report
contains recommendations on how to maximise the accuracy and consistency of data.
There was also a strength in the range of indicators produced by Mirus, showing a
willingness to become correctly informed in order to improve.
The analysis of data was identified as a weakness throughout, with several non-uniformed
approaches. Mirus lacked a detailed and systematic breakdown of data, which could affect
the interpretation of data along with comparisons and the identification of areas to target
improvements.
There was an overall lack of internal data comparisons to inform the organisation of
progress, this was also seen with external benchmarks, with only two out of the five data
sets providing external comparisons.
The outcome of this report shows an organisation heading in the right direction with
improving SHW performance. Indicators were effective for informing and improving SHW
performance and sustainability, however, the addition of health promotion programmes is
recommended to produce proactive leading indicators on health and performance,
increasing prevention methods as opposed to reactive methods.
Contents
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1

1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
2. Safety, health and wellbeing performance data ………………………………………………………………….. 4
   2.1 Employee Assistance Programme ………………………………………………………………………………. 4
   2.1.1 Lagging data …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
   2.1.2 Data collection and interpretation………………………………………………………………………. 4
   2.1.3 Safety, health and wellbeing performance …………………………………………………………… 4
   2.2 HR Data – Including Sickness and Absence Data ………………………………………………………….. 5
   2.2.1 Lagging data …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
   2.2.2 Data collection and interpretation………………………………………………………………………. 6
   2.2.3 Safety, health and wellbeing performance …………………………………………………………… 6
   2.3 HS Auditing ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
   2.3.1 Leading data …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
   2.3.2 Data collection and interpretation………………………………………………………………………. 7
   2.3.3 Safety, health and wellbeing performance …………………………………………………………… 8
   2.4 Investors in People Report ………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
   2.4.1 Leading data …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9
   2.4.2 Data collection and interpretation………………………………………………………………………. 9
   2.4.3 Safety, health and wellbeing performance …………………………………………………………… 9
   2.5 Staff Survey …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
   2.5.1 Leading data …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
   2.5.2 Data collection and interpretation…………………………………………………………………….. 10
   2.5.3 Safety, health and wellbeing performance …………………………………………………………. 12
3. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13
   References ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15