Learning Style Assignment | Online Assignment

Please follow the below in your case study:

1. Team matrix (10 marks)

Create a grid/matrix/chart showing all of your teams learning styles/preferences

2. Team matrix features (20 marks)

Identify and explain the key features of your teams learning preferences. What observations can you make. What are the strengths and weaknesses of your collective teams learning preferences? For example, if the majority are all reflectors what does this mean? What are the disadvantages/advantages?

3. Week 4 learning challenge – “in-action” (30 marks)

Provide examples from the week 4 team challenge illustrating the key features of your teams learning preferences/styles. For example, if the majority were Reflectors how did this show up in the team learning challenge? How were other learning preferences demonstrated? Provide examples from the week 4 learning challenge of learning a new skill and speaking another language.

4. Application of Learning Theories (40 marks)

Apply the relevant learning theory/ies/model(s)/concept(s) to explain how your team learned (do not include learning styles and preferences here). Include comparative analysis of these theories to demonstrate understanding. Provide clear examples.

Provide a detailed action plan based on your analysis of how you learned from the week 4 challenge. This action plan will need to clarify what your team is required to do to improve and enhance its performance, meeting your learning objectives and learning in future on-line team working activities on this paper.

Lastly, to engage your conference audience pose a number of critical questions from the above analysis. They should be open questions rather than closed and provoke discussion and conversation.

The topic will be the integration of learning styles and learning theories. See questions in assessment 1b folder. You have been invited to attend the New Zealand Association of Training & Development (www.nzatd.org.nz NZATD) biennial conference in Auckland on 3 & 4 March 2021. Either: Option One: Produce a 850 word case study (see Noe (2020, p.314-315) to be included in the conference proceedings based on the week 4 team challenge and subsequent reflective analysis. Include critical questions at the end of the case study (not included in word count) to engage your audience. Minimum of 5 peer reviewed references.