ISOL533 Cumberlands Scanning and Penetration Testing Tools Research Paper Topics for Network Security Research Paper and Presentation The majority of the

ISOL533 Cumberlands Scanning and Penetration Testing Tools Research Paper Topics for Network Security Research Paper and Presentation

The majority of the paper MUST address the highlighted topic below as it relates to Network Security. Specific hardware, software, service or systems may be used as short examples but should only represent a small portion of the total paper.

How can Descriptive Analytics, Predictive Analytics and Prescriptive Analytics be used in Network Security analysis and remediation Requirements: • Main Topic 1: Define Descriptive Analytics and describe how it can be used in Network Security analysis and remediation • Main Topic 2: Define Predictive Analytics and describe how it can be used in Network Security analysis and remediation • Main Topic 3: Define Prescriptive Analytics and describe how it can be used in Network Security analysis and remediation

• Content: o 7-10 double-spaced pages (at least 7 pages), using 12-font Calibri-Body. ? The Cover Page, Reference Page and any space needed for pictures/images are not included in the required pages. ? Make sure Paragraph Line Spacing is set to double-spaced with 0 before and 0 after. o 7-10 references (at least 7 references) of which 2 must be Peer Reviewed.

? Include a Reference page at the end of the document for each reference used (ordered alphabetically by last name). • Ensure each citation within the text is included on the reference page. • Ensure each reference on the reference page has at least one citation within the text. o Include all References as the last page of the Powerpoint Presentation as indicated in the Powerpoint Project template.( References should be Scholarly )

• Once the paper is completed, add an Overview to the start of the paper. The Overview must contain at least one Hypothesis (see Rubric) and a Synopsis of what is contained in the paper. o Include the Overview with Hypothesis as the 2nd page of the Powerpoint presentation.

NOTE: For this paper, a Hypothesis is a short statement you believe to be true based on the research you conducted. As an example, after doing research, you might say: “Descriptive Analytics is the most commonly used analytical tool”. The quality and thoroughness of the paper, as defined in the rubric, will determine the grade assigned. Papers containing the minimum number of references and/or minimum number of pages will most likely not earn a high grade

The Network tools we want you to work on is

a) Scanning network tools – 1) Nessus 2) Nmap

b) Penetration and Testing Network tools – 1) Net Sparker 2) Core Security

We want the the Research Paper & Power Point Presentation.Both

Please check the attached files below : ISOL532 RESEARCH PAPER FROM RESIDENCY WEEKEND
[ Enter Title here ]
[ Enter names {Last, First} of all Group members ]
Overview / Executive Summary
[Replace this Note and enter your Project Overview here. The overview should be added after
the content of the paper is completed. The overview should be one paragraph of between 150
and 250 words and summarize the content of the paper. You must add your Hypothesis at the
end of the overview.]
Hypothesis:
•
•
1
ISOL532 RESEARCH PAPER FROM RESIDENCY WEEKEND
2
[Remove this note and enter your paper here. Your paper must be at least 7 pages, 12
font double-spaced and uses a 1 inch left margin indent for all paragraphs. The Abstract page
and Reference page are NOT included in the 7 pages. Do not add an Introduction or Abstract
since these should have been covered in the Overview above.
References start on the next page, using the Citations & Bibliography feature in the
References tab. To customize a citation, right-click it and then click Edit Citation. There must
be at least 7 cited references of which 2 must be peer-reviewed. Highlight in YELLOW the peerreviewed works on the reference page.]
ISOL532 RESEARCH PAPER FROM RESIDENCY WEEKEND
References
Last Name, F. M. (Year). Article Title. Journal Title, Pages From – To.
Last Name, F. M. (Year). Book Title. City Name: Publisher Name.
3
ISOL532 RESEARCH PAPER FROM RESIDENCY WEEKEND
4
Figures title:
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Category 1
Category 2
Series 1
Category 3
Series 2
Category 4
Series 3
Figure 1. [Include all figures in their own section, following references (and footnotes and tables,
if applicable). Include a numbered caption for each figure. Use the Table/Figure style for easy
spacing between figure and caption.]
For more information about all elements of APA formatting, please consult the APA Style
Manual, 6th Edition.
Enter the Title of the Research Paper here
ISOL ??? – Group # ??
Group Members:
Name
Name
Name
Etc
?
Summarize the Overview here
?
Hypothesis: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
?
Summarize each of your main topics as
separate slides
?
Peer Reviewed references:
? xxxxxxxxxxx
? Xxxxxxxxxxx
?
Other references:
? Xxxxxxxxxxx
? xxxxxxxxxxx
Research Project Rubric
Component
Project Overview
Justification for
Hypotheses
Supporting Evidence
Review of Relevant
Research
Maintains Purpose /
Focus
?
?
?
?
Methodology
Sample
Procedures
Measures
Data analytic plan
Grammar, Clarity, and
Organization
References and Citations
Exemplary (3)
Effectively and insightfully develops a set of
testable, supportable and impactful study
hypotheses
The introduction section provides a cogent
overview of conceptual and theoretical issues
related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates
outstanding critical thinking.
Adequate (2)
Develops a set of testable and
supportable hypotheses
Inadequate (1)
Hypotheses are not testable or
justifiable
The introduction section
provides a logical overview of
conceptual and theoretical
issues related to the study
hypotheses. Demonstrates
competent critical thinking.
Very little support for the conceptual
and theoretical relevant to the study
hypotheses was provided. Provides
little evidence of sound critical
thinking.
Provides clearly appropriate evidence to
support position
Sophisticated integration, synthesis, and
critique of literature from related fields. Places
work within larger context.
Provides adequate evidence to
support position
Provides a meaningful summary
of the literature. Shows
understanding of relevant
literature.
The project has an
organizational structure and the
focus is clear throughout
Identifies appropriate
methodologies and research
techniques but some details are
missing or vague
Provides little or no evidence to
support position
Provides little or no relevant
scholarship
The project is well organized and has a tight and
cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the
document
Identifies appropriate methodologies and
research techniques (e.g., justifies the sample,
procedures, and measures). Data analytic plan
is suitable to test study hypotheses. Provides
appropriate justification for controls. Project is
feasible
The manuscript is well written and ideas are
well developed and explained. Sentences and
paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses
subheadings appropriately.
Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list
matches citations.
The manuscript effectively
communicates ideas. The
writing is grammatically correct,
but some sections lack clarity.
Properly cited. May have a few
instances in which proper
citations are missing.
The document lacks focus or contains
major drifts in focus
The methodologies described are
either not suited or poorly suited to
test hypotheses. The methodology is
under-developed and/or is not
feasible.
The manuscript is poorly written and
confusing. Ideas are not
communicated effectively.
The manuscript lacks proper citations
or includes no citations
1

Purchase answer to see full
attachment