In hospitalized adult patients, how does an educational program on central line management compare to no educational program in the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections?

Write a paper of 2-3 pages about the proposed interventions for your problem/issue supported by evidence collected by conducting a literature search and review. Integrate the information into your project.  The assignment should include:

1.The extent of evidence-based data for proposed interventions. 2.Comprehensive description of factors that might influence the use of proposed interventions.

3.Identify the barriers related to the proposed interventions. 4.Detailed list of resources that will be needed. 5.Detailed steps, or sequence of events, or specific implementation activities that will be required to implement the intervention. 6.Monitoring, tracking and ongoing review. 7.Performance of tasks required for implementation. Staff responsible in the implementation of the interventions and their qualifications. 8.Strategies that facilitate the implementation of the proposed intervention. 9.Timeline. 10.Expected outcomes to be achieved by your project.

Expectations

•Length: 2-3 pages •Format: APA 6th ed.

•Research: At least one peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years

My cap stone project is below

(My proposed Capstone project is

In hospitalized adult patients, how does an educational program on central line management compare to no educational program in the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections?

P: Patients with Central lines in MICU or hospitalized

I: educational interventions for staff and patients.

C Educational program compare to no educational program.

O: decrease rate of CLABSIs

T: within 90 days of process improvement implementation.

I am interested in Central line bloodstream infections (CLABIS).by using educational initiative could decrease the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. mandatory education program offered to ICU nurses and physicians. it was developed by a multidisciplinary task force to highlight correct practices for the prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. In this program, they included 10-page self-study module on risk factors and practice modifications involved in catheter-related bloodstream infections and in-services at scheduled staff meetings for their staff. Seventy-four episodes of catheter-associated bloodstream infection occurred in 7,879 catheter-days in the 24 months before the introduction of the education program. Following implementation educational of the intervention, the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infection decreased to 41 episodes in 7,455 catheter days. The estimated cost savings secondary to the decreased rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infection for the 24 months following the introduction of the education program was between $103,600 and $1,573,000. Educational intervention main focused on the education of health-care providers on the prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections. it may lead to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of primary bloodstream infections. Education programs may lead to a substantial decrease in medical-care costs and patient morbidity attributed to central venous catheterization when implemented as part of mandatory training.)