Explain Stace’s version of compatibilism
Compatibilists claim that once we are clear about what free action is, we will see that free action is compatible with determinism. Explain Stace’s version of compatibilism, the problems with it, and how Frankfurt’s version is supposed to fix those problems. Does it succeed? Why or why not? Might further modifications help? Or should we stick to the original Stace-ian version? I.e.—what is the best version of compatibilism that you can think of? How well does it fare?
PLEASE READ THE ASSIGNMENT AND MATERIALS CAREFULLY!!
The attachments are two articles, a sample template for this paper, and a writing guide from the professor. Please read before writing.