Explain Stace’s version of compatibilism

Question:

Compatibilists claim that once we are clear about what free action is, we will see that free action is compatible with determinism.  Explain Stace’s version of compatibilism, the problems with it, and how Frankfurt’s version is supposed to fix those problems.  Does it succeed?  Why or why not?  Might further modifications help?  Or should we stick to the original Stace-ian version?  I.e.—what is the best version of compatibilism that you can think of?  How well does it fare?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Explain Stace’s version of compatibilism
For $10/Page 0nly
Order Essay

PLEASE READ THE ASSIGNMENT AND MATERIALS CAREFULLY!!

The attachments are two articles, a sample template for this paper, and a writing guide from the professor. Please read before writing.

  • attachment

    stace.pdf
  • attachment

    ASampleTemplateforPhilosophyPapers_Ting-AnLin.docx
  • attachment

    Frankfurt.pdf
  • attachment

    howtowrite.doc
  • attachment

    PhilWritingL9-10.pdf
  • attachment

    PhilWritingL11.pdf
  • Posted: 2 hours ago
  • Due: 
  • Budget: $50
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper