Emotional And Mental Health After Abortion Feedback Essay This is the same question that you did for me but now I need to give feedback for other students

Emotional And Mental Health After Abortion Feedback Essay This is the same question that you did for me but now I need to give feedback for other students about the same assignment.https://www.studypool.com/discuss/11375327/complet… There are 3 files attached one is the feedback explanation, one for the assignment explanation and the other 2 are for students I need to give them a feed back about their assignments. You can write each student’s feed at the end of their file Assignment 2.1: Prewriting Assignment
Due: Sunday, February 24, by 11:59 pm
•
•
•
•
This Assignment 2.1 is the first step of the Diversity and Health Care Professional Blog assignment.
The rubric for this assignment is located at the end of the assignment description.
In addition to submitting your prewriting work to this assignment, you will also submit your prewriting
work to the Assignment 2.2: Peer Review assignment before 11:59 pm on Sunday, February 24.
All assignments close at 11:59 PM. The phrase “due by 11:59 pm” means assignments must be
submitted before 11:59 pm. Assignments not submitted before the assignments close at 11:59 pm
will not be accepted.
Overview:
For this prewriting assignment, students will engage with the research and outlining
steps necessary to produce a high-quality, professional blog. Students must determine
which health care system studied in Blog 1 they wish to further investigate. All students
will write about a single diverse group, and how that diverse group fits within the chosen
health care system.
The diverse group that all students will write about is: Women
Note: This assignment contains many of the same steps as your prewriting assignment
for your first blog, but adds the step of outlining. This is designed to build upon your
prewriting process.
Students will:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Conduct research
Develop a thesis statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Determine how their argument (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. is
situated within the body of existing knowledge and research
Use credible sources to support their argument (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.
Organize their thoughts and research into a clear structure
Write an outline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
A “sample” is provided at the end of the layout and assignment description for you. This
sample is provided only to demonstrate how your assignment should be structured for
submission.
Step 1: Health Care System Choice
Your first step for this prewriting assignment is to choose which health care system you
wish to further investigate. The health care system you choose must be one that you
wrote about for Blog1.
How this fits into your submission:
This section will be titled “Health Care System Focus,” and will appear toward the top of
your outline.
Your chosen health care system will appear as part of your preliminary blog title (Links
to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Step 2: Determine your focus
Next, you will determine your focus. You are likely to find that determining your focus for
this blog is more difficult than it was last time. Last time, we gave you limited options,
but this time there are hundreds of topics you may wish to explore in relation to health
care and women.
Below are some examples of ways that you can focus your research and writing.
Remember, these are just a handful of examples to help you start thinking about some
of the ways you can focus your research, and you should explore a wide range of topics
and areas to find something that interests you.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Treatments
Development of treatments
Health care provider attitudes toward women
Access to health care
A particular health issue, such as heart disease, back injury, migraine,
endometriosis, mental health, etc.
Etc. –> there are hundreds of ways you can focus your research
It may help to think about what aspects of your chosen health care system you found
interesting, perplexing, infuriating, etc. Or perhaps you have had, or know a woman who
has had, an unsettling, difficult, problematic, etc. health/health care experience, and you
may wish to examine whether it was an isolated instance or if it is a wide spread issue.
Perhaps you have recently seen a headline about a health issue that you would like to
know more about. It may also help to browse headlines in the health sections of some
of the reliable news sources listed in the Approved Sources list from the last assignment
to help you find a focus for your Diversity blog.
You may end up deciding to change your focus at some point, which is perfectly fine.
However, you need to begin researching and gathering information, and having a focus
will help you do that.
How this fits into your submission:
This section will be titled “Topic Focus.” You will include whatever topic you ultimately
choose. You will offer an appropriate name/title for the focus, and a brief description (no
more than 1 paragraph) of how you intend to focus on that topic. Your description
should be clear and descriptive, but also concise.
Your chosen focus will also become part of your preliminary blog title (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site..
Step 3: Research and Comparison Determination
Now that you have made some basic determinations for how you will proceed, you will
dive into researching your topic within the confines of your chosen health care system
and how women are affected.
Research:
You are required to use a minimum of 5 sources for this blog, which will ultimately be
listed at the bottom of your blog under the heading “References” (just like last time). For
this assignment, 3 of your 5 required sources must be from published, peer
reviewed academic journals. As part of this prewriting assignment, you will include
annotated citations of your 3 journal articles in your bibliography below.
The Approved Sources list is still approved, of course, but you are no longer limited to
that list. You may also use additional sources of your own finding beyond the 3 required
journal article sources; yes, this means that the other two required sources can be
sources that are not included in the Approved Sources list from the last
assignment. However, it is essential that the sources you use are similar in credibility
and authority to the sources indicated in the Approved Sources list from the last
assignment. Sources that are not similar in credibility and authority will not be counted
toward your required number of sources.
A list of unacceptable sources has been included below.
Comparative Element:
As you research, you are likely to wonder about how what you are finding relates to
other systems, people, studies, etc. If your curiosity does not automatically cause you to
start doing this, you will need to remind yourself to think about how what you are finding
is situated more broadly. In this way, you will begin to determine how you wish to fulfill
the comparison requirement for this assignment.
Some examples of comparison include, but are not limited to:
•
•
Comparisons between groups of women within a single country’s health system (for
example, race, religion, cultural heritage, language, body size, etc.)
Gender comparisons (for example, how heart disease is approached and treated in
women patients, and how that approach and treatment compares to and differs from
how heart disease is approached and treated in men; or mental health approaches
•
•
and treatments for women and/or girls vs mental health treatments for men and/or
boys)
Comparison of your focus (for example, women’s access to health care) between
the two health care systems you researched for your first blog
Etc. –> there are many comparative elements you can consider
How this fits into your submission:
1. Comparative Element
Once you have an idea of what kind of comparative element you wish to explore, you
will need to figure out how to navigate that comparison. For this part of the assignment,
you will include an appropriate title for your comparative element, along with a brief
description (no more than a paragraph) that explains why you wish to use this
comparative element, and how you plan to approach it.
2. Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
As you research, you will begin to collect sources that fit well within the framework of
your paper. These sources should both inform and support your thesis statement and
arguments.
You are required to list the 5 sources you plan to use (as outlined in the first three
bullets below), and provide annotations for the 3 academic journal sources (the last
bullet point). Each annotated entry must include the following, and should be structured
in the same order as listed below:
•
•
•
Name of author(s); date published; title of work; journal name
Full APA source citation (provide a complete APA style citation that is consistent
with the source type and APA guidelines for that particular source type; utilize the
resources suggested to you to properly complete this step)
Bibliographic annotation (100-150 words, required for your 3 journal sources).
1. Summarize the central idea (argument/thesis) of the source
2. Briefly explain the qualifications of the source (author(s), organization, etc.) to speak
as an authority on the topic
3. Describe what the resource is (e.g., if the resource is the CIA World Factbook,
describe what that is, how/why it exists, what it is used for, etc.; if the resource is a
report, explain what the report covers, why it was made, what audience it is intended
for, etc.) and how the resource is useful to your work
Step 4: Thesis Statement
As you research you will begin to develop perspective, understanding, and background
that will allow you to develop an informed and authoritative argument. From this
foundation of research, you will utilize the thesis resources you have been provided
with, and others available through the Communication for Engineers website, to develop
your thesis statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Starting with a
strong, well-informed thesis statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site. will help you with the overall organization and clarity of your professional blog.
Your direction and argument may end up changing as you write your blog (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site., which means that you may need to revise your
thesis statement after you have finished writing to fit what you have created. This is
normal, and even expected. Thus, while developing a strong, clear, concise thesis
statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. now is essential to helping
guide you through the process of organizing your work and getting your ideas onto
paper, you are not beholden to your original thesis statement (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site., and should feel confident enough in your autonomy as a
writer to allow yourself to make useful, necessary, and justifiable changes.
You will include your thesis statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site. toward the top of your pre-writing submission.
Step 5: Outline
Now that you have focused your ideas, conducted research, and developed a thesis
statement, it is time to begin structuring your work in the form of an outline. For this
assignment, your outline will be fairly simple (for your final blog, you will be required to
complete a full outline).
Step 6: Include 2-3 Questions
You have done a good deal of work toward your blog. What questions or concerns do
you have about your work so far? What issues are you encountering that you’d like
someone to talk through with you? What do you need help with?
Formulate 2-3 questions that you would like your peer reviewers to respond to, and
include them as the first item in your Prewriting assignment. You will title this section
“Questions for Peers.”
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Assignment 2.2 is the second step of the Diversity and Health Professional Blog assignment. As
noted above, there are two (2) due dates for this assignment.
Students must submit their work as a reply to the assignment. Work submitted outside of the
assignment (e.g., in a separate discussion board) is not eligible for grading, and will not be accepted.
The rubric for this assignment can be found by clicking on the menu button in the header of the
assignment (the menu is represented by 3 dots).
In addition to submitting your Prewriting work to this assignment for review by 2/24/19 by 11:59 PM,
you will also submit your Prewriting work to Assignment 2.1: Prewriting before 11:59 PM on 2/24/19.
All Peer Reviews are due by Thursday, 2/28/19 by 11:59 PM.
All assignments close at 11:59 PM. The phrase “due by 11:59 PM” means assignments must be
submitted before 11:59 PM. Assignments not submitted before the assignments close at 11:59 PM
will not be accepted.
You are expected to submit your work far enough ahead of the deadline that you will be able to cope
with and overcome unforeseen challenges.
Overview:
For this peer-review assignment, students will be asked to speak to a number of
elements in their peers’ prewriting work. The peer review process for this assignment
requires students to take responsibility for providing clear, actionable, helpful feedback
to their peers. The prompts for feedback in this assignment are less specific than they
were in the peer review assignment for Blog 1, in part because you are now more
familiar with the peer review and feedback process, and are therefore able to provide
more informed and thoughtful feedback.
For this peer-review assignment, you must:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Submit your own work to the peer review assignment before 11:59 PM on 2/24/19.
Remember: In order for peer review to work, everyone must have something to
review, which means everyone must submit something to be reviewed.
Submit your prewriting work and feedback as a reply to the assignment. Students
who fail to submit their work and/or feedback to the assignment as a reply are
ineligible for grading, and their work will not be accepted.
Submit your peer reviews as a threaded reply to the writer you are reviewing.
Provide clear, thoughtful feedback, and actionable suggestions and
recommendations.
Thoughtfully respond to your peers’ questions after completing the rest of the peer
review (as detailed below), and provide actionable feedback in regard to your peers’
questions or concerns.
Review every submission in your group. Reviews are due before 11:59 PM on
2/28/19.
Peer Review Steps and Requirements:
Step 1: Reading
Always begin each review by first reading the writer’s entire submission. Once you have
read the writer’s submission, respond to the prompts below.
Step 2: Response Organization and Formatting
Clearly organize your feedback by creating headings as listed below. Bold and
underline each heading title so that they are clear and easy to identify. Your feedback
for each section will go under the appropriate heading in regular font (in other words,
your feedback under each heading will not be bolded, underlined, or italicized). Create
these headings:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Thesis Statement
Focus
Comparative Element
Source Review and Formatting
Outline Completeness and Formatting
Visual Elements
Responses to Questions (under this heading, you will clearly label “Question 1,”
“Question 2,” etc. so that the writer can clearly identify which questions you are
responding to)
Step 3: Offering Feedback
You will review the work of all the members in your group. Respond to the feedback
prompts below. The prompts are intentionally broad to allow for students to respond
thoughtfully using the experience and prior knowledge they bring to this assignment. If
you need help figuring out how to respond to a particular section, look back to previous
assignment resources for inspiration. For example, if you are unsure of how to begin
offering feedback on a writer’s thesis statement, re-visit the UNC Thesis Statement
handout that you were required to read for the last assignment.
Your feedback must be clear and thoughtful, and your recommendations must be clear
and actionable.
The prompts for each section are listed below:
Thesis Statement
•
•
•
•
Speak to the writer’s thesis statement.
Consider elements such as clarity, conciseness, position, etc.
Consider whether it answers the “So what?” and “Who cares?” questions.
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Focus
•
Speak to the writer’s focus.
•
•
Consider elements such as topic manageability and narrowness.
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Comparative Element
•
•
•
•
Speak to the writer’s comparative element.
Consider the clarity of this element: is the comparison sensible? clear? easy to
imagine/understand?
Consider the scope of this element: is the scope manageable? overly broad? difficult
to comprehend?
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Source Review and Formatting
•
•
•
•
Review the writer’s sources by examining/visiting each listed source. Verify each
source using the CRAAP Test (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Speak to the credibility, relevance, accuracy, usefulness, etc. of the sources.
Review and speak to citation formatting.
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Outline Completeness, Organization, and Formatting
•
•
•
Speak to the writer’s fulfillment of the outline requirements.
Speak to the organization of the writer’s work. Consider clarity of organization from
your point of view as a reader.
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Visual Elements
•
•
Given your understanding of the writer’s organization, direction, discussion, etc.,
speak to how, where, and to what purpose the writer should include visual elements.
Consider visual element types, reader needs, enhancement, etc.
Offer at least one actionable recommendation.
Responses to Questions
•
•
Respond to the writer’s individual questions. (Organize as indicated above.)
Offer clear, thoughtful responses, and actionable recommendations.
Step 4: Submit Peer Reviews
•
•
Complete and submit your reviews by Thursday, February 28, before 11:59 PM.
Submit each review as a threaded reply to each writer’s submission.
Question for Peers:
Thanks for taking the time to review my work, I have two questions for my research:
Is the opinion of my paper clear?
Do you think my body paragraph evidence is sufficient?
Working Title: Emotional and Mental Health After Abortion
Health Care System Choice:
Focus: Most abortions performed today are for social or psychological reasons. The
cause of therapeutic abortion does not justify the psychological trauma experienced by
women with mental instability after abortion, although many studies today attempt to
prove that abortion is not harmful to a woman’s mental state. However, the flaws in
these studies have always had some drawbacks.
Comparative Elements: The abortion opponents claim: Having an abortion leads to
emotional distress, negative feelings or mental health problems. But the research shows
Women’s feelings after having an abortion vary, but several studies published
in Perspectives have found no evidence that having an abortion is itself responsible for
later mental health problems.
Outline:
General Purpose: The abortion and mental health controversy
Specific Purpose: Whether abortion affects women’s emotional distress, negative
emotions or mental health problems.
Thesis Statement: Stress impacts mental health, and this is true whether it is the
stress of having an abortion, whether the person is male or female, and whether there
were pre-existing mental health struggles.
Introduction: Whether a woman has had an abortion in the first trimester, she chooses
to have a baby and have a baby. The underlying causes of mental health problems may
be related to the reasons for pursuing abortion, but they are related, not causal.
Although abortion and mental health are relevant in women, medical procedures rarely
cause mental health problems when they are obtained legally and safely. These
problems are more likely to occur before surgery, or the same stress that causes
abortion leads to poor mental health.
Main Point 1: Four months after the abortion, four out of …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment