EDCO 715 Liberty University Borderline Personality Disorder Research Paper This is a 15 page paper, make sure everything is in APA format. The professor is

EDCO 715 Liberty University Borderline Personality Disorder Research Paper This is a 15 page paper, make sure everything is in APA format. The professor is very picky. lol Instructions attached. This is the worst professor I ever had. lol she is so picky sorry to say this EDCO 715 PERSONAL THEORY GRADING RUBRIC (BASED ON 240 POINT TOTAL)
Criteria
Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :
Satisfies Criteria
Developing (C- to C+):
Satisfies most criteria
Below Expectations (F to
D+):
Does not satisfy criteria
Not
Present
Content: 70% = 168 pts
Background:
Factors
Influencing
Distress
Content:
Theory
Based
Treatment
Strategies
Integration
of Christian
worldview
16 to 17 pts.
15 pts.
14 pts.
1–13 pts.
0 points
Project clearly delineates how
the client’s background,
emotions/sensations, thoughts,
actions, and family/cultural
systems interrelate to create
distress.
Project delineates how the client’s
background, emotions/sensations,
thoughts, actions, and
family/cultural systems interrelate
to create distress.
Project somewhat delineates
how the client’s background,
emotions/sensations, thoughts,
actions, and family/cultural
systems interrelate to create
distress.
63 to 67 pts.
58 to 62 pts.
54 to 57 pts.
Project rarely delineates
how the client’s
background,
emotions/sensations,
thoughts, actions, and
family/cultural systems
interrelate to create distress.
1–53 pts.
0 points
All components as described in
the assignment have been
thoroughly addressed.
Assertions are relevant and
properly supported by evidence.
The conclusion offers a good
summary of issues treated in the
paper and offers practical
application (key mechanisisms,
treatment strategies, biblical
principles/biblical worldview
application, scientific research
identified)
63 to 67 pts.
All components as described in
the assignment have been
addressed. Assertions are mostly
relevant and mostly supported by
evidence. The conclusion offers a
summary of issues treated in the
paper and offers application
Most components as
described in the assignment
have been addressed, or all
components are present but
need improvement. Some
assertions are relevant and
supported by evidence. The
conclusion may need
improvement.
Few components as
described in the assignment
have been addressed, or all
components are missing.
The conclusion is weak or is
not present in the paper.
60 to 62 pts.
57 to 59 pts.
1–56 pts.
• Theological Implications for
Counseling have been
thoroughly addressed.
• Assertions are relevant and
properly supported by
evidence.
• Content is noticeably
supported by pertinent
sources.
• Theological Implications for
Counseling have been
addressed.
• Assertions are mostly relevant
and mostly supported by
evidence.
• Content is supported by
pertinent sources.
• Theological Implications
for Counseling have been
addressed but needs
improvement.
• Some assertions are
relevant and supported by
evidence.
• Content is marginally
supported by pertinent
sources.
• Theological
Implications for
Counseling was poorly
addressed or not at all.
• Content lacks pertinent
sources.
0 points
Points
Earned
16–17 pts
Conclusion
• The conclusion offers a good
summary of issues treated in
the paper and offers practical
application.
15 pts.
• The conclusion offers a
summary of issues treated in
the paper and offers
application.
14 pts.
• The conclusion needs
improvement.
1–13 pts.
0 points
• The conclusion is weak
or is not present in the
paper.
Structure: 30% = 72 pts
23 to 24 pts.
Organization
Style
Sources
• All required elements are
included and presented with
strong headings and
organizational clarity.
• There are clear transitions
between paragraphs and
sections.
• The treatment of the topic is
logically oriented.
• The paper meets the page
length requirement.
23 to 24 pts.
21 to 22 pts.
• All required elements are
included and organized.
• There are transitions between
paragraphs and sections.
• The treatment of the topic is
logically oriented.
• The paper meets the page
length requirement or comes
very close.
19 to 20 pts.
1 to 18 pts.
0 points
• Most required elements are
included and are mostly
organized.
• Most paragraphs and
sections have transitions.
• The logical treatment of the
topic needs improvement.
• The paper may not meet the
page length requirement.
• Few or no required
elements are included.
• Few or no transitions
exist between paragraphs
and sections.
• There may not be a
logical treatment of the
topic.
• The paper does not meet
the page length
requirement.
1 to 18 pts.
0 points
0 points
21 to 22 pts.
19 to 20 pts.
• The paper properly uses
current APA style.
• Proper headings, in-text
citations, and references are
formatted correctly.
• The paper reflects a graduate
level voice and vocabulary.
• There are very few spelling
and grammar errors.
• The paper consistently uses
current APA style with few or
no exceptions.
• Proper headings, in-text
citations, and references are
formatted with few or no
errors.
• The paper reflects a graduate
level voice and vocabulary.
• There are few spelling and
grammar errors.
• The paper inconsistently
uses APA style.
• Headings, in-text citations,
and references are
inconsistently formatted.
• The paper does not
consistently reflect a
graduate level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are spelling and
grammar errors.
23 to 24 pts.
21 to 22 pts.
19 to 20 pts.
• The paper erroneously
uses or does not use APA
style.
• Headings, in-text
citations, and references
are erroneously formatted
or not present.
• The paper does not
reflect a graduate level
voice and vocabulary.
• There are numerous
spelling and grammar
errors.
1– to 18 pts.
The Reference page meets or
exceeds the required number of
sources.
The Reference page meets the
required number of sources.
The Reference page does not
meet the required number of
sources.
The Reference page is not
present or contains few
sources.
Total
Instructor’s comments:
EDCO 715
Personal Counseling Theory Creative Project/Paper Instructions and Rubric
Seligman and Reichenberg’s text has discussed secular counseling theories that emphasize client
background, emotions, thoughts, actions, and systems (family, etc.). The Tan integration text,
class presentations, and various articles have addressed theological and Christian worldview
aspects of applying various secular theories. You will combine these sources and additional
outside research (ten additional sources) to describe your emerging “working theory” of
counseling. Your working theory can focus mainly on one secular theory that you like or be a
combination of several secular theories that you like.
You will develop a 15-page paper (not including title page, abstract, and references) or,
alternatively, you may develop a project utilizing an Adobe creative suite software or other
software. For example, a video, narrated PowerPoint, web page, etc. are possibilities to complete
this assignment. Please contact the instructor and present the idea when choosing this option for
clarification of expectations. The creative project will address similar content as the paper, but
has much flexibility in material presentation.
If doing the paper, it will be in APA format. LIMIT first person while describing your emerging
theory. The paper/creative project will include the following section headings.
•
•
•
•
Background: Factors Influencing Distress: Discuss the following:
o how clients’ backgrounds, emotions/sensations, thoughts, actions, and
family/cultural systems create his/her current distress.
Content: Theory Based Treatment Strategies:
o Explain key underlying mechanisms that lead to meaningful change in clients.
o Describe key treatment strategies and relate them to the intended outcome(s).
Integration of Christian worldview:
o In light of the above intended outcome, explain how your Christian worldview
develops a responsible faith-based eclectic working theory.
o Include what biblical principles inform your theory. Many times scriptural
themes can relate to your chosen theories. The Tan text and narrated PowerPoints
related to Biblical worldview considerations should give you a clear idea of a
variety of theological principles supporting the secular models and alert you to
issues related to these models.
o Example of a biblical worldview issue that should be addressed. Secular theories
often see human nature as basically good (humanistic theories), dark or bad
(Freud’s theory of human nature being a cauldron of instincts and defense
mechanisms), or neutral (behaviorism). The Bible, on the other hand, recognizes
us as having the capacity for tremendous good because we are created in the
image of God and also the capacity for evil because of the fallen nature, so we
have both from a biblical worldview framework.
Conclusion: Summarize your findings in your “Conclusion.” Please be reminded not to
introduce new material that was not included in the body of your paper.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment