CSC208 DePaul Code Of Ethics And Ethical Framework Assignment For this part, explore the process you use to make ethical decisions. Are you religious? Log

CSC208 DePaul Code Of Ethics And Ethical Framework Assignment For this part, explore the process you use to make ethical decisions. Are you religious?

Logical? Intuitive? Other?

(10 points) Write at least one paragraph where you explore/reflect on your decision making process (your framework).
(15 points) Write a methodology that others can use to apply your framework. Your framework should resemble the foundational ones, including numbered steps.
Part II

The preamble is worth 5 points
Each principle is worth 5 points
Each argument is worth 15 points

What is a Preamble?

A preamble is an introductory statement to a speech, code of ethics, legal document, etc. You need to write a preamble that will provide personal information that will allow the reader to understand your principles. For example, if your principles address your use of computing technology at your place of employment, you should include statements regarding where you work and explaining your responsibilities at your place of work. For examples, see the IEEE and ACM code of ethics.

Your Code of Ethics

Write your own personal code of ethics annotated with justifications that provide a fullfledged rationale for your choice of principles. You need 7 distinct principals thataddress your relationship with/use of computing technology. In the entire final, you must use each of the frameworks we covered in class once and your own framework:

Kant’s 1st and 2nd formulations of the categorical imperative (considered one framework)
act utilitarian and Rawls’s Theory of Justice (considered one framework)
rule utilitarian
social contract theory
moral rights
virtue Ethics
your own framework

You need not address the problems applying the frameworks. At this point in time, you should be able to select the most appropriate framework for the issue at hand.

Rubric Part 1.1
A detailed, well written, complete description of your philosophy ? A Range
A well written description of your philosophy ? B Range
A short description of your philosophy ? C Range
A short, poorly written, description of your philosophy ? D Range
A paragraph that does not address your philosophy ? F Range
Rubric Part 1.2
A detailed well written, step-by-step methodology of your decision making process that I can apply to other ethical issues A Range
A step-by-step methodology of your decision making process that I can apply to other ethical issues B Range
An incomplete methodology C Range
A methodology that I cannot apply to other ethical issues D Range
Missing the methodology F Range
Part 2
Rubric for the Preamble

1) (2.5 points) Must provide information about you so your principles make sense.

2) (2.5 points) Must be true; do NOT make up anything.

Rubric for the Principles
(2.5 points) regarding your personal use of computing technology. You will lose 2.5 points if your principles do not address your personal use of technology.
(2.5 points) distinct and different from the other principles. If your principles are not distinct, you will only receive credit for the first one.
Rubric for the Procedures (Frameworks)
Correct methodology C range
Good argument B range
Excellent argument A range CSC 208 Instructions for the Final Project
Total 170 points
You must submit this project to D2L.
You may submit a PDF version of this project to D2L.
If you have an Apple computer, I strongly suggest submitting a PDF version.
Project Objectives
1. Demonstrate competency regarding the application of the frameworks
(See PID Learning Outcomes 1–3; 5–6)
2. Examine and reflect on your own decision making process
3. Examine and reflect on your use of computing technology
You must
• work alone
• meet ALL specifications, including:
a) use the provided template
b) use Microsoft Word, or submit a PDF version of your file
c) be personal and truthful; do not make anything up
d) have 7 distinct—regarding different issues—principles addressing your use of
computing technology
e) correctly apply each of the foundational frameworks (see Labs) ONCE
f) apply your own framework ONCE
g) Cite all sources including Birsch, Quinn, etc., for frameworks and any other texts
you use.
h) be well organized
i) be edited for grammar/spelling errors
j) be formally written
Note: The final project is NOT substantial in terms of length; note that IEEE’s code of
ethics is only one page. You will be graded on substance, not quantity.
Part I
Worth 25 points
For this part, explore the process you use to make ethical decisions. Are you religious?
Logical? Intuitive? Other?
1. (10 points) Write at least one paragraph where you explore/reflect on your decision
making process (your framework).
2. (15 points) Write a methodology that others can use to apply your framework. Your
framework should resemble the foundational ones, including numbered steps.
Part II Worth 145 points
•
•
•
The preamble is worth 5 points
Each principle is worth 5 points
Each argument is worth 15 points
What is a Preamble?
A preamble is an introductory statement to a speech, code of ethics, legal document, etc.
You need to write a preamble that will provide personal information that will allow the
reader to understand your principles. For example, if your principles address your use of
computing technology at your place of employment, you should include statements
regarding where you work and explaining your responsibilities at your place of work. For
examples, see the IEEE and ACM code of ethics.
Your Code of Ethics
Write your own personal code of ethics annotated with justifications that provide a
fullfledged rationale for your choice of principles. You need 7 distinct principals that
address your relationship with/use of computing technology. In the entire final, you
must use each of the frameworks we covered in class once and your own framework:
1. Kant’s 1st and 2nd formulations of the categorical imperative (considered one
framework)
2. act utilitarian and Rawls’s Theory of Justice (considered one framework)
3. rule utilitarian
4. social contract theory
5. moral rights
6. virtue Ethics
7. your own framework
You need not address the problems applying the frameworks. At this point in time,
you should be able to select the most appropriate framework for the issue at hand.
Rubric Part 1.1
1) A detailed, well written, complete description of your philosophy ? A Range
2) A well written description of your philosophy ? B Range
3) A short description of your philosophy ? C Range
4) A short, poorly written, description of your philosophy ? D Range
5) A paragraph that does not address your philosophy ? F Range
Rubric Part 1.2
1) A detailed well written, step-by-step methodology of your decision making process
that I can apply to other ethical issues ? A Range
2) A step-by-step methodology of your decision making process that I can apply to other
ethical issues ? B Range
3) An incomplete methodology ? C Range
4) A methodology that I cannot apply to other ethical issues ? D Range
5) Missing the methodology ? F Range
Part 2
Rubric for the Preamble
1) (2.5 points) Must provide information about you so your principles make sense.
2) (2.5 points) Must be true; do NOT make up anything.
Rubric for the Principles
1) (2.5 points) regarding your personal use of computing technology. You will lose 2.5
points if your principles do not address your personal use of technology.
2) (2.5 points) distinct and different from the other principles. If your principles are not
distinct, you will only receive credit for the first one.
Rubric for the Procedures (Frameworks)
1) Correct methodology ? C range
2) Good argument ? B range
3) Excellent argument ? A range
References
You will lose up to 5 points for not citing your work.
Cite any other sources you use, including the philosophers, religious texts, etc.
Possible References (Taken from the readings). You may copy and paste these into your
Final Project.
Aristotle. “Nicomachean Ethics.” The Internet Classics Archive by
Daniel C. Stevenson, Web Atomics. Trans. W. D. Ross.
classics.mit.edu//Aristotle/nicomachaen.html Accessed January 2017.
Bentham, Jeremy. “Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.” Some Texts
from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated by
Jonathan Bennett. www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/bentham Accessed January
2017.
Birsch, Douglas. Introduction to Ethical Theories, A Procedural Approach. Long Grove:
Waveland Press, Inc., 2014. Print.
Hobbs, Thomas. “Leviathan.” Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican
and Amyas Merivale. Annotated by Jonathan Bennett. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/hobbes . Accessed January 2017.
Kant, Immanual. “Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals.” Peter Millican and
Amyas Merivale. Annotated by Jonathan Bennett. Web. 17 January 2017.
from www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdf Accessed January 2017.
Locke, John. “Second Treatise of Government.” Some Texts from Early Modern
Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1689a_1.pdf Accessed January 2017.
Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism.” Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy.
Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mill1863.pdf Accessed January 2017.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “The Social Contract.” Some Texts from Early Modern
Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/rousseau Accessed January 2017.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment