Crime Cases in Las Vegas Casinos Research Proposal Paper this is a proposal paper on a local las vegas issue this can be an issue such as homelessness, lac

Crime Cases in Las Vegas Casinos Research Proposal Paper this is a proposal paper on a local las vegas issue this can be an issue such as homelessness, lack of teachers in clark county, lack of volunteers in las vegas, the lowering water levels of lake mead etc. please allow me to approve the topic you choose. the paper has to clearly identify why this is a problem for las vegas locals, how it effects them and mainly a proposal on how to change the problem the paper must be between 9-10 pages double spaced. below is the paper description and grading rubric. please read through this carefully. please also be sure to present credible sources, and unpack each statement you make in the paper fully. PLEASE feel free to contact me with ANY questions

Rationale:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Crime Cases in Las Vegas Casinos Research Proposal Paper this is a proposal paper on a local las vegas issue this can be an issue such as homelessness, lac
For $10/Page 0nly
Order Essay

Persuasion and research are major research elements in academic writing. College students must be able to articulate specific claims, find reliable evidence to support their ideas, and tailor their research to the values and beliefs of different audiences to make their opinions convincing. The final paper for this course, a 8- to 10-page persuasive proposal paper, will give you practice researching and writing an effective argument and proposing change.

Description:

Basics: You will persuade us that a local problem is significant and propose an action that should help to drastically reduce this problem (most likely) or eliminate this problem. You will identify a specific audience to which this proposal would be directed and persuade that audience that your unique proposal is logical and well-supported.

Topic:

Subject Matter: The subject of the paper is completely up to you. I would prefer you find something local or in your specific field of study. These types of proposals are often more feasible, and you’re more likely to be engaged in something with which you’re closely associated. At the same time, if there’s a topic that interests you which remains outside your field of study or in another community, please follow it. This should facilitate your continued interest in the issue, but it won’t if you select a topic just to “complete the assignment,” so choose wisely! Remember that you’ll be working on this final project (and this issue) for most of the semester.

Some Warnings About Your Topic:

When deciding on a topic, here are a few warnings:

Pay attention to Scope: Try to avoid presenting proposals that are too grand in scope, such as a large-scale national proposal. Basically, keep this question in mind: can you cover the logistics of implementing this proposal in 8-10 pages? I need to know exactly how this would look when enacted. If, for example, you are trying to support a national proposal, you need to prove that it will affect all states in the same fashion (this is EXCEPTIONALLY DIFFICULT).
Avoid Confirmation Bias: As challenging as it may be, try to find an argument on which you don’t hold any strong biases. It’s difficult to be objective when you go into the research process with preconceived notions. At the same time, this could be your opportunity to challenge these preconceived notions with actual research. Just make sure to follow the evidence, NOT JUST YOUR FEELINGS/BELIEFS.
Fix an ACTUAL problem: Remember that this paper should focus on an existing problem. A paper defending gay marriage may produce some fascinating arguments, but it is already legal. As such, your argument is…well, pointless right now.
Watch out for vague, generalized proposal terms: When presenting proposals, watch out for terms that can be misconstrued by audiences. For example: Calling for the implementation of after-school programs can be problematic, as the term “after-school programs” is somewhat vague. In addition, watch out for any topic associated with obesity. In my experiences, students try to cover the greater issue of general health whenever they touch upon anything related to obesity, and their proposal loses focus. If you’re interested in obesity, ask yourself this: what am I saying that hasn’t already been said by a thousand sources? (Also, keep in mind that I’ve read arguments of this sort SOOOOOOOOO many times, so I’ll probably be more critical of the paper)
A proposal is not a call for the elimination of an existing proposal: Many people are critical of existing proposals. You may be tempted to call for the elimination of a certain policy. That’s fine, but that’s not a proposal. You need to provide a solution for the problem that the existing policy is trying to resolve. (“YOU GOT ANY BETTER SUGGESTIONS?”- Jaws)
Make sure to acknowledge and respond to opposition: I know it sounds strange, but your argument is actually strengthened by the inclusion of opposition. By identifying and responding to opposition (often refuting it), you convey to the reader that you are a critical thinker who has really explored all avenues of thought. A good rule of thumb is to assume that your audience disagrees with you. How can you convey that you have really heard their points of opposition? Once again, return to the criteria for effective communication: listening, understanding, and responding.
Avoid topics based on morality: I know that moral codes often guide people to do great things, but try to avoid topics that rely on religious dogma for support. You can believe what you want, but you have to prove your points with empirical evidence in this class.

Requirements:

Your paper should following the following guidelines:

Number of sources: You should incorporate research from an appropriate amount of sources. I know that this is an ambiguous term. I don’t want you to find sources merely to fill the requirements of the assignment. You should find a sufficient amount of sources to fully support all your arguments/claims; by the end of the semester, I want to feel as though you have become an expert in this topic. Basically, every avenue of thought surrounding this topic should be considered and every argument (for and against the proposal) should be supported by evidence.
Peer-Reviewed Sources: At least three of your sources need to be peer-reviewed. If you have less than three sources, or only three, I can assure you that your ideas aren’t supported or you aren’t really exploring the complexity of the issue. ***The citations for these sources need to be in bold***
Field Research: At least one source needs to represent field research/a primary source (interview, observation, survey, etc.). If you utilize two primary sources, I’m willing to consider the second a peer-reviewed source.
Visual Component: You are required to include at least one visual in your paper. The paper should represent at least 8 FULL pages before the incorporation of the visual.
Formatting: This piece can be formatted according to MLA or APA format. It really depends on what your intended audience (which would be listed at the top of your paper or on the Title Page) would demand. If the subject is related to business or humanities, the audience who can implement this action is most likely going to prefer MLA. If the subject is more science or technology-based, they would probably prefer APA.

Audience

This is a personalized essay with a formal tone. While this paper should display a level of professionalism, your personal voice should come through. Although the use of “I” is not necessary, I would like to see that you’re actively engaged in the topic. Research and education have no place in a person’s life if one can’t find practical application for this information. Although self-reflection may be an element of this assignment, don’t become too casual with your language (don’t use text-speak or common slang, unless there’s a clear purpose for doing so).

Your argument should be tailored to a specific audience; this audience should be able to implement this issue (the head of the Athletics committee at CSN, CSN’s Board of Trustees, Nevada’s water commission, etc.). You will need to identify this intended audience underneath the title. In addition, don’t discount the impact of reflective writing. As you conduct extensive research on your topic, allow an amount of objective, mental flexibility. You are not only researching this issue to persuade the audience, but to possibly find alternative perspectives on the issue. Your views may change in the composition of this paper. Due to this, you are being persuaded, and are part of the audience, as well.

Proposal Paper

Proposal Paper

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Introductory Paragraphs

15.0 pts

Title and introductory paragraphs identify topic and engage the audience.

7.0 pts

Title and introductory paragraphs identify topic and engage, but are somewhat cliche

0.0 pts

Title and introductory paragraphs are vague or misleading

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience Awareness

40.0 pts

A specific audience is clearly identified. The identified audience would be able to implement this action. Tone, style, content and structure are consistently tailored to audience. The evidence/arguments appeal to this audience’s beliefs and values.

20.0 pts

The identified audience is rather general/vague. Tone, style, content and structure waffle. Some evidence/arguments wouldn’t appeal to this audience’s values/beliefs.

0.0 pts

Tone, style, content and structure are not consistently tailored to audience

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10.0 pts

Conclusion provides effective closure. The audience understands the takeaway message.

5.0 pts

Conclusion provides very little closure; asks questions, but doesn’t attempt to answer them

0.0 pts

Conclusion doesn’t provide closure

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis Clarity

20.0 pts

Thesis is clearly stated or implied- the action you’d like to see from your audience is apparent

10.0 pts

Thesis is slightly unclear.

0.0 pts

Thesis is unclearly stated or implied

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthos

40.0 pts

Personal experiences and/or observations are relevant and proportionate; strong authorial credibility

20.0 pts

Personal experiences and/or observations are somewhat relevant; hazy authorial credibility

0.0 pts

Personal experiences and/or observations are not consistently relevant or proportionate; weak authorial credibility

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking/Persuasiveness

50.0 pts

Discerning; that is, evidence, claims, and conclusions are effectively analyzed and evaluated; inferences are drawn. Evidence isn’t merely presented an left to speak for itself.

25.0 pts

Somewhat discerning; could take their inferences further. Sources are often left to speak for themselves.

0.0 pts

Not discerning; that is, evidence, claims, and conclusions are ineffectively analyzed and evaluated. Sources are always inserted without context.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure

20.0 pts

Overall organization is purposeful, focused and fluid; redundancy is not a problem. Transitions are used to connect one section to another.

10.0 pts

Overall organization is somewhat purposeful, focused and fluid, but some redundancies exist. Transitions are occasionally used to connect sections.

0.0 pts

Overall organization is unclear, unfocused AND disjointed; redundancy is a problem. There is no attempt to connect the sections of your paper through effective transitions.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Credibility

20.0 pts

Sources are credible. At least three of the sources are peer-reviewed and one source of evidence represents field research that the author has collected.

10.0 pts

Some sources don’t appear credible. At least one of the sources is peer-reviewed and field research is included.

0.0 pts

Sources are not credible. None of the sources are peer-reviewed and field research appears to be missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information

60.0 pts

Information derived from sources is typical, sufficient and relevant. The evidence helps to support that a problem truly exists, that it was caused by certain factors, and that the proposal will effectively solve the problem.

30.0 pts

Some information isn’t relevant, typical or sufficient.

0.0 pts

Information derived from sources is atypical, insufficient, AND irrelevant

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration

25.0 pts

Sources are integrated effectively

12.0 pts

Some sources are not integrated effectively, or some are missing

0.0 pts

Sources are missing, dropped in, AND ineffectively integrated

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations

30.0 pts

Works Cited Page and in-text citations are present and formatted according to MLA or APA standards is accurate.

15.0 pts

Citations are present, but they don’t submit to most APA- and MLA-style formatting standards.

0.0 pts

Works Cited Page and in-text citations are missing or serious problems are evident.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

25.0 pts

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling follow standard usage. Sentences are varied and dynamic in their structure.

12.0 pts

At least three recurring errors persist in the grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Sentences often follow a pattern or aren’t developed.

0.0 pts

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling don’t consistently follow standard usage. Sentences always fall into a pattern.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph Unity, Coherence, and Development

15.0 pts

Paragraphs are consistently unified, coherent, and well-developed

7.0 pts

Some paragraphs are not consistently unified, coherent, or well-developed.

0.0 pts

Paragraphs are not consistently unified, coherent, or well-developed

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Element

30.0 pts

A visual has been integrated into the essay. The visual helps to support an argumentative point made in the paper.

15.0 pts

A visual has been integrated into the essay, but it has a tenuous connection to any argumentative point made in the paper.

0.0 pts

There is no visual integrated into the paper.

30.0 pts

Total Points: 400.0

Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper