BUSI 511 LU What Have Been Some of The Main Challenges Posed by The Growing Use of Medical Technology Please draft a response to another students discussio

BUSI 511 LU What Have Been Some of The Main Challenges Posed by The Growing Use of Medical Technology Please draft a response to another students discussion Board Post. The original instructions for the students post are as follows:

Although medical technology brings numerous benefits, what have been some of the main challenges posed by the growing use of medical technology in the United States? Next, how do American cultural beliefs and values influence the use of medical technology?

Here is the students post to the above question you are replying to:

2 days ago

Amelia Quinto

Amelia Quinto: DB4 Main Thread

COLLAPSE

How Technology Challenges Healthcare in the United States

Innovation has furthered healthcare in numerous ways (Campbell, et al., 2018). Medical technology that identifies patterns and forecasts results may help stop many diseases. Remote diagnostic devices and evolving systems of communication can increase the quality of patient care, which correspondingly make care less expensive (Campbell, et al., 2018). Electronic health records, which allow providers to access a patient’s complete medical history rapidly, also lead to better care (Adane, et al., 2019).

Nevertheless, technology brings about challenges. Accordingly, healthcare administrators and leaders must work to overcome these challenges so all patients can profit from the newest developments in medical technology. The following are some healthcare challenges presented by technology:

Training Issues

Continuing medical technology education is vital for medical professionals and healthcare administrators. Yet, these individuals often have demanding timetables and may not have the time to learn the latest technology. Not having a complete understanding of novel medical apparatus may result to blunders, which is why it is crucial that medical facilities plan training for innovative processes or expertise (Ko, et al., 2018). Consequently, implementing technology in medicine has a steep learning curve. Those who need it most may not have the time to learn how to use it. Though, without a comprehensive understanding, trying to apply the most recent medical technology can lead to practitioner error and malpractice.

Greater Expenses

For healthcare facilities with inadequate resources, innovative expenses can pose difficulties. Experts concur that healthcare has a troubled economic stance mainly because of its related costs (Harris, et al., 2017). These cost increases can be due to new technologies or the intensified utilization of old ones. Thus, the regulation of technology is one of the most significant aspects in bringing outlays at a minimum. Still, experts warn that any effort to limit the introduction of new technologies beyond what is essential for safety and efficacy would be unethical (Harris, et al., 2017).

Meaningful Use Non-Compliance

Meaningful use denotes the provisions in the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. This sanctioned incentive payments via Medicare and Medicaid to clinicians and hospitals that use electronic health records (EHRs) in a meaningful way to essentially improve clinical care (Lin, et al., 2019). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Incentive Programs encourage healthcare facilities to make meaningful use of electronic health records, but this is challenging for several. Professionals who do not act in accordance with meaningful use measures will experience a reduction in Medicare reimbursements. This could fundamentally increase financial apprehensions for institutions with monetary difficulties.

Recommendations from Experts

The technological challenges demonstrate that synchronizing with technological advances is difficult. Accordingly, experts offer suggestions on how to keep up with technology. Among other things, it was suggested that health care facilities become proactive and anticipate future needs (Greenhalgh, et al., 2017). More notably, experts highlighted that patient care takes precedence over reservations about technology (Mackey, et al., 2019).

How American Cultural Beliefs and Values Influence the Use of Medical Technology

Americans have high expectations of discovering health remedies through science and technology. They associate the application of cutting-edge medical technology with high-quality care (Shi & Singh, 2019, p. 109).

Technology is Highly-Valued

Americans are more concerned about the quality of health care than its cost. Additionally, many consider a low-cost provider to be second-rate. There is some evidence that individuals view higher prices as a substitute for quality (Greene & Sacks, 2018). They assume that higher-priced care is better care and that less expensive care is inferior.

Higher cost is characteristically paralleled with greater quality in most products and services. Moreover, it is sensible to assume that they bring the same interpretation to health care. Thus, there is a likelihood that consumers’ misunderstandings and misconstructions of cost data may result in lesser value selections (Greene & Sacks, 2018). Therefore, providers should support consumers and help them realize that a physician who delivers higher-quality care than other providers does not automatically cost more.

Technological Imperative

The inclination to have an advanced technology available, coupled with the fascination to use it regardless of its cost, is referred to as the technological imperative (Shi & Singh, 2019, p. 110). Because of technology’s success and preeminence in medicine, the reliance on it has engendered a technological imperative. This objectifies and frames patients according to automatous rules.

Technology’s accomplishments produced a demand to intensify the application of technology if the objective is to continue improving healthcare. Thus, Americans are rationally and professionally enforced to think that if there is no increase in the practice of technology, they are not as steadfast to improving the health and healing of patients.

Scriptural Integration

Technology is fundamentally shaped by human beings to assist them in reaching beyond what they can do. This encompasses completing an old task more efficiently or performing a function that was totally impossible previously. Technology is widespread, and it is so intensely intertwined into daily chores that individuals scarcely notice its presence. That is precisely why it is so vital that people consider it from a Christian standpoint. Romans 1:22 asserted: “Professing to be wise, they became fools” (New International Version, 2011). Hence, how one utilizes technology is what counts. Correspondingly, technology is neither overpoweringly good nor integrally evil (Legault, et al., 2018).

References

Adane, K., Gizachew, M., & Kendie, S. (2019). The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: A review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 12, 67-73. doi:10.2147/rmhp.s179259

Campbell, B., Campbell, M., Dobson, L., Higgins, J., Dillon, B., Marlow, M., & Pomfrett, C. J. D. (2018). assessing the value of innovative medical devices and diagnostics: The importance of clear and relevant claims of benefit. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 34(4), 419-424. doi:10.1017/S0266462318000466

Greene, J., & Sacks, R. M. (2018). Presenting cost and efficiency measures that support consumers to make high-value health care choices. Health Services Research, 53(4), 2662-2681. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12839

Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., . . . Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. doi:10.2196/jmir.8775

Harris, C., Allen, K., King, R., Ramsey, W., Kelly, C., & Thiagarajan, M. (2017). Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 2: Identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 328-12. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2211-6

Ko, M., Wagner, L., & Spetz, J. (2018). Nursing home implementation of health information technology: Review of the literature finds inadequate investment in preparation, infrastructure, and training. Inquiry (Chicago), 55, 004695801877890. doi:10.1177/0046958018778902

Legault, G. A., Verchère, C., & Patenaude, J. (2018). Support for the development of technological innovations: Promoting responsible social uses. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 529-549. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9911-5

Lin, Y., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? evidence from the HITECH act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306-318. doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0813

Mackey, T. K., Kuo, T., Gummadi, B., Clauson, K. A., Church, G., Grishin, D., . . . Palombini, M. (2019). ‘Fit-for-purpose?’ – challenges and opportunities for applications of blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 68-17. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1296-7

Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2019). Essentials of the U.S. health care system (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning