DNP 838 Grand Canyon University Mentoring Project in Nursing Presentation In the second part of your mentoring project, you will develop a mentoring progra

DNP 838 Grand Canyon University Mentoring Project in Nursing Presentation In the second part of your mentoring project, you will develop a mentoring program for a novice faculty or nurse in your setting. Your program should consider all elements of teaching and instruction. For example, you should consider not only the content of your program, but also the way you will deliver feedback to your mentee. In a PowerPoint of 10-15 slides, include the following in your mentoring program design:

A description of your purpose for mentoring, including why the mentoring relationship is relevant to your setting and the roles of the mentor and mentee.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for your program.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee.
Instructional, assessment, and feedback techniques you will utilize to guide and direct your mentee during the mentorship.
Remember the PowerPoint is not a paper on slides, the slides should not be so wordy. You can save that for the speaker’s notes.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Course Code
DNP-838
Class Code
DNP-838-O500
Criteria
Percentage
Mentor Project Part Two: Program Design PowerPoint
100.0%
Purpose for Mentoring, Including Why Mentoring
Relationship Is Relevant to Setting and the Roles
of the Mentor and Mentee
15.0%
Stages of the Mentor Relationships and a
Timeline for the Program
15.0%
Short- and Long-Term Goals With the Mentee
15.0%
Instructional, Assessment, and Feedback
Techniques to Guide and Direct Mentee During
the Mentorship
15.0%
Presentation of Content
10.0%
Layout
10.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Mentor Project Part Two: Program Design PowerPoint
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A description of the purpose for mentoring, including why the
mentoring relationship is relevant to setting and the roles of
the mentor and mentee, is not included.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for the
program are not included.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee are not included.
A discussion of the instructional, assessment, and feedback
techniques that will be used to guide and direct the mentee
during the mentorship is not included.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
A description of the purpose for mentoring, including why the
mentoring relationship is relevant to setting and the roles of
the mentor and mentee, is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for the
program are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee are present, but
they lack detail or are incomplete.
A discussion of the instructional, assessment, and feedback
techniques that will be used to guide and direct the mentee
during the mentorship is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive
information is included.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A description of the purpose for mentoring, including why the
mentoring relationship is relevant to setting and the roles of
the mentor and mentee, is present.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for the
program are present.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee are present.
A discussion of the instructional, assessment, and feedback
techniques that will be used to guide and direct the mentee
during the mentorship is present.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical and typographical errors are present, but
they are not overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
A description of the purpose for mentoring, including why the
mentoring relationship is relevant to setting and the roles of
the mentor and mentee, is clearly provided and well
developed.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for the
program are clearly provided and well developed.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee are clearly
provided and well developed.
A discussion of the instructional, assessment, and feedback
techniques that will be used to guide and direct the mentee
during the mentorship is clearly provided and well developed.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is
included.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A comprehensive description of the purpose for mentoring,
including why the mentoring relationship is relevant to
setting and the roles of the mentor and mentee, is thoroughly
developed with supporting details.
Stages of the mentor relationships and a timeline for the
program are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Short- and long-term goals with the mentee are thoroughly
developed with supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of the instructional, assessment,
and feedback techniques that will be used to guide and direct
the mentee during the mentorship is thoroughly developed
with supporting details.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The presentation includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The
presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main
idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
Comments
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment